What, who made these wild accusations of Jim being "smug", or "to full of himself"? Obviously, he can't be, he's Jim and we all should thank god for him! I say brand the heretics talking against him, punish them for their blasphemy!
On Topic: I have to say, sometimes i kinda have mixed feelings about it. Since i am out of school (noone wants to talk about this in school obviously
i had many discussions about "sexism" (which i consider objectification of sexes a part of) as a broad topic/ the broad topic it is. And honestly, while i like to "ignite" talking about sexism and why and how not only sexes should be treated more equal, but that the awareness about diversity in genders should be increased, sometimes i get tired of the topic myself. That's because there's so much talk, so much discussion, but the effects seem to come so slow, creeping almost and then sometimes i have to "defend" myself against people who accuse me of being sexist, for example through the language i use (english is less effected by these problems compared to my native language, but imagine someone tells you "human" would be a sexist term, because it has "man" in it - while i understand the critisim and realize where it comes from, i find it utterly unnecessary to start discussions about something like this within a supporting community, while there's still so much to do in the "big picture").
That's why i can kinda understand when people get tired of the topic "in general". But honestly, "sexism" was a problem over 100 years ago, was a problem 2 years ago, when Jimquisition started to run on the escapist and still is a problem today. Why is it a problem? Well, despite the whole "gender-equality" issues and yadidadida (easiest example to look at is in close to every commercial, where women are targeted for cleaning products, fancy clothes and whatnot, while men appearently have to have expensive cars and own everything that underlines their masculanity and status), it constricts so much of the possibilities within the game-industry, to make a broader range of "better" games! It isn't even about "undoing" God of War, or Dead or Alive Beach-something (weeell... nah, not gonna stress this further
, but about all those games that break with the standarts and create something "original" and "deep" (and honestly, things like God of War are neither original nor deep in story or emotional content). Obviously, there are already some games with awesome female leads who aren't reduced to their sexual appearance and not objectified, but make for intelligently created protagonists (one of the most known examples is "Beyond Good and Evil", i also like "Primal" for that matter, but others may come up with something better). But why do some developers still have to fight to create something like "Remember me"? Why are there so few games, where the protagonist isn't idealized, as described by Jim? Recently i've searched explicitly for games that won't "empower" the player much, to focus on more relatable characters and compelling stories and some of those are pure gaming-gold to me! Why aren't there more games like that?
Again, sure it is nice to go all "Duke Nukem" or "Kratos" in a game, that's what it is about, the possibility to feel like someone different for some time and to experience and explore the extraordinary. But playing something like "Papo & Yo", "The Walking Dead", "Lone Survivor" or others, to experience many different things that way, like emphasis for unusual disempowerment, emotional struggle, the general weirdness of the human mind and so on and so forth can be just as much about "gaming".
I think that's part of the reason why every gamer should care and support any discussions and actions considering the matter, to encourage "improvment"/ diversity within the industry and obviously part of the reason why the Jimquisition still finds points to clearify about sexism in gaming. And as that, this episode is just as well done and has a solid argument as ever.
Probably the point is already clear to many who watched all the other episodes which are part of the sexism discussion, but why not stir it up again, while it is as important as ever?!
... and i think this still applies.