You think?grimner said:Yet your tone suggests it's not.JohnFei said:Oh I think it's quite courageous of him. Very golfclap worthy.
All of which, in the past. Nice of you to nail it so eloquently for me tho.He wasn't, he hasn't and he doesn't. He has criticised collusion in the past, he has criticised lack of disclosure, he has called out industry BS a lot of time, he recognised the games media's tenddency to belittle its audience and issued his own mea culpas on the issue (back in 2012)
Jim Sterling is a hypocrite because he only stands up for consumers against certain parties. I like your comparison with Kain, who despite staying neutral, has actively engaged with Gamergate and called out the bullshit from the journalists. Meanwhile, Jim is busy deflecting for his pals and refusing to join the discussion, content with taking potshots at some shitty PR company and youtubers. Sure, the draconian conditions should be condemned, but his silence on the elephant in the room is deafening.
And that elephant's just gonna get bigger and bigger.
I like your debate style, it's kind of adorable. And still tragically missing the point.Doritosgate had absolutely zero consequences (well, at least one site changed its terms of service, but funnily enough, #gamergate has it blacklisted), and your bringing about ME3 is moot given the fact that I didn't bring it up. so, yeah, there's that.