That's what I saw first too... and saw Disney in there too. I was more than a little confused at first.Moeez said:I first thought it read "John Carpenter's Mars" and thought ALREADY a remake?!
Never read the books, and looks pretty generic from the trailer. But hey, it can't be worse than Tron Legacy, right?
Wikipedia has lead you astray, I just finished the first book and Sarkoja played a small but important and recurring role.Andy Chalk said:One of the things that has me nervous is that IMDB lists Sarkoja and Matai Shang, who didn't turn up until the third book
Shocks the hell out of me that they are keeping Carter as a 19th century cowboy. That alone gives me a bit of hope. Otherwise I'm willing to give a bit of leeway.Andy Chalk said:One of the things that has me nervous is that IMDB lists Sarkoja and Matai Shang, who didn't turn up until the third book (according to Wiki, yes, I had to look it up) which suggests that they're planning on cramming in more than just the first book - which is an awful lot of ground to cover for one movie. Meanwhile, there's no mention at all of Mors Kajack, and the Thark looks like a cross between a Salarian and Jar-Jark Binks.
I am concerned.
Indeed. Having other planets look as dull and boring as our own justifies all the NASA budget cuts.Veterinari said:I'm happy with earthy-toned mars, it looks a lot better.
I agree. Make the action like the old Robin Hood, pirate and musketeer movies, you know true swashbuckling movies and I would be very happy.Andy Chalk said:I do take issue with your remark about the source material, however. The fact that it's "comically cliched" isn't relevant, or shouldn't be. If you're going to make a John Carter movie, make a John Carter movie. Make it true to the story, a swashbuckling tale of manly men and damsels in distress. Don't fuck around with it. I can put up with a lot, but my real fear is of a strong, empowered, sharp-tongued Dejah Thoris, fighting side-by-side with her man John Carter, proving that even on Mars, sisters are doing it for themselves!
I will weep. Seriously.
Some leeway is fine. I think the LOTR series did a fantastic job and I'm not ashamed to say that the changes made to the Watchmen made it far better, not just as a movie but as a story. It's a fine line and it's hugely subjective, but that doesn't prevent me having certain expectations from this movie, and concerns that it's not going to meet them. My remark about a modern-woman Dejah Thoris probably sums it up best, not because I hold sexist views toward women but because 19th attitudes toward women feature fairly prominently in the book, and I want that in my movie experience.Veterinari said:When it comes to fucking around with the source material I think some leeway should be granted to make sure it's a good film that people "get".
I always envisioned them the same way, sort of a planet-wide "noble savage" thing. So the non-redness doesn't really bother me - but I do wonder how they're going to handle the First Born.On a side note - I always interpeted "red" Martians as being "red" from the point of view of a 19th century southern gentleman, i e native Americans. Are you guys telling me I was supposed to think they were actually red?
You are quite correct, sir. I mixed up Sarkoja with Phaidor, Matai Shang's daughter.crotchdot said:Wikipedia has lead you astray, I just finished the first book and Sarkoja played a small but important and recurring role.
Its disney.... dont hold your breath.Woodsey said:"Lynn Collins"
Seeing it.
Let's hope its rated EB, for exposed boobies.
All my worries in a nutshell.Logarithmic Limbo said:Dude, its Disney, whaddaya expect. I read the books a million years ago when I was a wee lad and I loved them. I hope they dont fuggit up too badly.Xaryn Mar said:Hmmm, As someone said above the red matians are not red in the movie and I must say that they wear way too much clothes (They had no more than a loincloth and jewelry in the books).