I don't care about comics or the Joker's backstory, as far as I'm concerned this is a movie about a clown losing his mind, and it looks great, way better than the rest of the superhero movies if you ask me.
The one where Joker's specific origin is explained.Silentpony said:Killine or Killing Joke? I know what the killing joke is and its okay(I did hear the movie was terrible), Killine joke(I'm assume its a meme of some sort?) I don't know.Johnny Novgorod said:So you don't like The Killine Joke?Silentpony said:So a complete misunderstanding of the Joker movie. Great.
The whole point of the Joker is A. He can be anyone and B. He's an opposite to Batman.
Giving him an actual name, backstory and removing Batman is possibly the dumbest thing you can do with the Joker, and I'm including street-thug Damaged tattooed Suicide Squad Joker.
Also making the Joker a sympathetic anti-hero is a huge mistake. If there's one character in ALL of pop-culture you're not supposed to root for, its the Joker.
Wasn't it implied at the end he was lying the entire time?Johnny Novgorod said:The one where Joker's specific origin is explained.Silentpony said:Killine or Killing Joke? I know what the killing joke is and its okay(I did hear the movie was terrible), Killine joke(I'm assume its a meme of some sort?) I don't know.Johnny Novgorod said:So you don't like The Killine Joke?Silentpony said:So a complete misunderstanding of the Joker movie. Great.
The whole point of the Joker is A. He can be anyone and B. He's an opposite to Batman.
Giving him an actual name, backstory and removing Batman is possibly the dumbest thing you can do with the Joker, and I'm including street-thug Damaged tattooed Suicide Squad Joker.
Also making the Joker a sympathetic anti-hero is a huge mistake. If there's one character in ALL of pop-culture you're not supposed to root for, its the Joker.
It really isn't. In the 1989 movie, he has an exceedingly not mysterious backstory. In the Dark Knight it's not really explored. For most moviegoers, that very concept would be news.Silentpony said:What i mean is that the Joker's mysterious backstory is part of the character.
I'd bet he kills her.Casual Shinji said:Let's hope the mom is not obviously gonna die tragically and obviously send Arthur Fleck over the edge though.
I hope it's a double feature.PsychedelicDiamond said:Honestly, this looks like a feature length apology for Leto.
Remember how The Joker had a different story every time for how he got those scars?erttheking said:On another forum I saw someone remark that the best way to do something like this would be to have it be the standard set up but then a third of the way through the movie it stops and the narrator goes "wait, no. That's not how it went..." before starting over with a totally different premise.
Not exactly. By Joker's own admission he's an unreliable narrator who remembers his past differently at different times. Which is a completely different kettle of fish. In fact, the backstory we see in the Killing Joke isn't actually told to anyone. It's revealed directly to the audience via flashback, not conveyed to other characters through monologue. And because the Joker's an unreliable narrator, the veracity of these flashbacks is uncertain.Silentpony said:Wasn't it implied at the end he was lying the entire time?Johnny Novgorod said:The one where Joker's specific origin is explained.Silentpony said:Killine or Killing Joke? I know what the killing joke is and its okay(I did hear the movie was terrible), Killine joke(I'm assume its a meme of some sort?) I don't know.Johnny Novgorod said:So you don't like The Killine Joke?Silentpony said:So a complete misunderstanding of the Joker movie. Great.
The whole point of the Joker is A. He can be anyone and B. He's an opposite to Batman.
Giving him an actual name, backstory and removing Batman is possibly the dumbest thing you can do with the Joker, and I'm including street-thug Damaged tattooed Suicide Squad Joker.
Also making the Joker a sympathetic anti-hero is a huge mistake. If there's one character in ALL of pop-culture you're not supposed to root for, its the Joker.
I just came here to say this. Nicholson's Joker is a mafia thug that gets a chemical bath and goes crazy. The beauty of the character is that it isn't tied down to a particular background like some others (Dr. Freeze, Ras Al'Ghul and Riddler for example) and can have a backstory that fits well with the particular story being told. That Ledger's Joker lacked a backstory and was just a rogue agent fit well with the theme of the Dark Knight, just as Nicholson's mafia thug on chems worked well for a Joker building a crime empire.Pyrian said:It really isn't. In the 1989 movie, he has an exceedingly not mysterious backstory. In the Dark Knight it's not really explored. For most moviegoers, that very concept would be news.Silentpony said:What i mean is that the Joker's mysterious backstory is part of the character.
It should be noted that Ledger's version has a quite a bit of evidence that he was ex-military (ala Patton Oswalt [https://www.indiewire.com/2018/05/patton-oswalt-joker-origin-story-heath-ledger-dark-knight-1201964845/]), specifically intelligence or EOD, depending on your take. It's a fairly compelling argument, at least from my perspective, but one of the things about the character was that we, at best, could only guess where this manifestation of the madness that was gripping Gotham came from.Gethsemani said:I just came here to say this. Nicholson's Joker is a mafia thug that gets a chemical bath and goes crazy. The beauty of the character is that it isn't tied down to a particular background like some others (Dr. Freeze, Ras Al'Ghul and Riddler for example) and can have a backstory that fits well with the particular story being told. That Ledger's Joker lacked a backstory and was just a rogue agent fit well with the theme of the Dark Knight, just as Nicholson's mafia thug on chems worked well for a Joker building a crime empire.Pyrian said:It really isn't. In the 1989 movie, he has an exceedingly not mysterious backstory. In the Dark Knight it's not really explored. For most moviegoers, that very concept would be news.Silentpony said:What i mean is that the Joker's mysterious backstory is part of the character.
I actually liked Leto's Joker more than Ledger's ( I know that's tantamount to heresy online). I found that the Mob Boss/ Gang Leader/ War Lord vibe from Leto-Joker was more menacing than Ledger-Joker's crazed, chaotic anarchist and his small army of nutjobs and psychopaths.Tireseas said:Am I the only one who wasn't completely disappointed with the Leto version? Like, I get why people hate it, but part of portraying the Joker on film (or any medium) is adding some kind of uniqueness to the character that burns the image in your mind.
Given the completely different tones of the films, I think each portrayal was fitting for their role. That said, I?ll always be partial to Ledger?s Joker. Unlike many, I guess I like the grim-dark stuff, and Ledger?s Joker was outright scary in his mania, a genuinely dangerous person, and not merely the stock cackling, egomaniacal villain with a plan and clown gimmick.twistedmic said:I actually liked Leto's Joker more than Ledger's ( I know that's tantamount to heresy online). I found that the Mob Boss/ Gang Leader/ War Lord vibe from Leto-Joker was more menacing than Ledger-Joker's crazed, chaotic anarchist and his small army of nutjobs and psychopaths.Tireseas said:Am I the only one who wasn't completely disappointed with the Leto version? Like, I get why people hate it, but part of portraying the Joker on film (or any medium) is adding some kind of uniqueness to the character that burns the image in your mind.
I can kind of understand some of the frustration. Not the 'white male incel' part, but more the 'society punished him, therefor he'll punish society' vibe I'm getting from this trailer. Apart from it being kind of an indulgent fantasy for the socially awkward that have a chip on their shoulder, it's just a very overused villain trope.Here Comes Tomorrow said:The weird backlash about it being a white male incel fantasy is also hilarious.
.Casual Shinji said:I can kind of understand some of the frustration. Not the 'white male incel' part, but more the 'society punished him, therefor he'll punish society' vibe I'm getting from this trailer. Apart from it being kind of an indulgent fantasy for the socially awkward that have a chip on their shoulder, it's just a very overused villain trope.Here Comes Tomorrow said:The weird backlash about it being a white male incel fantasy is also hilarious.
I would've found it more interesting if this character was a succesful business man with a loving family who just goes crazy/gives into an insanity that may have always been there. Sort of in a similar vein as American Psycho.