Joss Whedon to Direct Batgirl Movie

Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
Isn't it only the feminists that didn't like The Killing Joke?

DC don't do things by halves....either Zak Snyder who is an awful director, or Joss Whedon, one of the absolute best. If it happens, the film won't suck for lack of vision or talent at the helm, that's for certain.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,480
7,055
118
Country
United States
Jonbodhi said:
"deprotagonize?" Whoa! Word for the day! Seriously, though, I don't understand the cynicism here. It's not like the story ended when she was crippled. Barbra Gordon post-shooting was about a hundred times more interesting and influential in the D.C. universe. I think a sequel tracking her transition into Oracle, the founding of the Birds of Prey and maybe even the recruitment of Cassandra Cain as a new Batgirl would make a comic-book movie more compelling then anything D.C.-related that WB has done since The Dark Knight.

And I'm sure there will be a serious, no-interference clause in his contract: why would he agree to anything less? I doubt he needs the money.
That's the funny thing about Barbra Gordon: if it weren't for fans of the character getting a chance to write her years after the Killing Joke, her story would've ended with her getting crippled. She was expendable, which is why she got shot to begin with.

Now she's a fan favorite. And I know what Joss Whedon does to fan favorites when he gets the chance...
 

KissingSunlight

Molotov Cocktails, Anyone?
Jul 3, 2013
1,237
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
KissingSunlight said:
I thought Angel TV series was dark and gritty for most of it's run.
It's also worth noting Buffy got pretty bleak in the last two seasons (existential crisis, destructive sadomasochism, attempted rape, that sort of thing), and Dollhouse was seriously twisted and disturbing at times. Though if audio commentaries are to be believed, a lot of Buffy's latter season freakiness was perhaps down to Marti Noxon, not Joss.
The less said, about the last two years of Buffy, the better. They had the perfect series finale with The Wish (the season five finale). Joss Whedon was spread out too thin trying to write and executive produced three TV series at the same time. As a result, the quality on Buffy dropped considerably.

As for Batgirl, I am going to wait and see. Who am I kidding? I am going to watch this movie, because Joss Whedon is going to be writing and directing it.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
KissingSunlight said:
The less said, about the last two years of Buffy, the better. They had the perfect series finale with The Wish (the season five finale). Joss Whedon was spread out too thin trying to write and executive produced three TV series at the same time. As a result, the quality on Buffy dropped considerably.
Nah, I heartily disagree.

I see S4 and 5 as maybe the best - and possibly personal favourites - in terms of consistency and cohesion (with S3 being the one where the series really started to spread its wings, despite some seriously wayward structuring/pacing and inconsistency). Had it stopped at S5 we'd have missed out on the musical ep, Darth Rosenberg Dark Willow, some great character arcs and moments (particularly Spike and Anya), and episodes like Conversations With Dead People, Selfless, Lies My Parents Told Me, and Chosen (not to mention a few others as well).

S6 and 7 may've been uneven at times, and I've never felt the Potentials worked on a TV's budget (the brilliant Storyteller and some moments in Chosen aside. the Potentials do work much better on the page, in Season 8), but when it was good, I feel it was as good as the show ever got; darker, smarter, and more mature (in a genuine way, not a DCEU-thus-far adolescent boy kinda way... ). By comparison S1 and 2 are just as uneven (arguably more so), but considerably dumber and cheesier.

It's true Joss was stretched, but he almost always is (or used to be) and I feel it absolutely worked out for the best. He clearly trusted the people around him, and in general anyone who stayed on across the seasons got pretty damn good by the last two.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
KingsGambit said:
Isn't it only the feminists that didn't like The Killing Joke?
No, I'm pretty sure non-feminists thought that Batgirl having sex with someone who was a father figure was a fucking stupid idea. Doubly so when Batgirl remarks that the only reason she became Batgirl was that she wanted Batman's penis. I mean, fuck off, is that all you can come up with for her DC? Oh, and the bad guy they made up for it did all the stereotypical bad guy things, like asking Batgirl if she was on her period. Because "how rite womez?"

No, plenty of people hated it.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/batman_the_killing_joke/
 

KissingSunlight

Molotov Cocktails, Anyone?
Jul 3, 2013
1,237
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
KissingSunlight said:
The less said, about the last two years of Buffy, the better. They had the perfect series finale with The Wish (the season five finale). Joss Whedon was spread out too thin trying to write and executive produced three TV series at the same time. As a result, the quality on Buffy dropped considerably.
Nah, I heartily disagree.

I see S4 and 5 as maybe the best - and possibly personal favourites - in terms of consistency and cohesion (with S3 being the one where the series really started to spread its wings, despite some seriously wayward structuring/pacing and inconsistency). Had it stopped at S5 we'd have missed out on the musical ep, Darth Rosenberg Dark Willow, some great character arcs and moments (particularly Spike and Anya), and episodes like Conversations With Dead People, Selfless, Lies My Parents Told Me, and Chosen (not to mention a few others as well).

S6 and 7 may've been uneven at times, and I've never felt the Potentials worked on a TV's budget (the brilliant Storyteller and some moments in Chosen aside. the Potentials do work much better on the page, in Season 8), but when it was good, I feel it was as good as the show ever got; darker, smarter, and more mature (in a genuine way, not a DCEU-thus-far adolescent boy kinda way... ). By comparison S1 and 2 are just as uneven (arguably more so), but considerably dumber and cheesier.

It's true Joss was stretched, but he almost always is (or used to be) and I feel it absolutely worked out for the best. He clearly trusted the people around him, and in general anyone who stayed on across the seasons got pretty damn good by the last two.
It's good to see someone else liking Season 4 as well. While there are a couple of episodes of each in the last two seasons I liked as well. (Season 6: Once More, With Feelings & Hell Bells Season 7: Lies My Parents Told Me & Selfless) The storyline was trying too hard to be adult. The Big Bads in the last two seasons were pathetic. (The three nerds and incorporeal spirit of The First Evil) Honestly, I prefer Vamp Willow over Dark Willow. I simply hated the addiction storyline in Season 6. It completely hamstrung her character. I thought how they ended the series at Season 5 was better. (Remember, they were cancelled by The WB after Season 5. The were picked up by The CW for the last two seasons.) I didn't like the resolution in The Chosen. The burden of responsibility that Buffy struggled with, being the chosen one. She now puts that on millions of unsuspecting women. So, she can ride off in the sunset and do whatever she wants. That was less heroic and more controversial than what happened in The Wish. I will circle back and say I did like The Potentials better in the Season Eight comic books. However, near the end of that season, I was completely confused about what was happening and stopped reading them.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,480
7,055
118
Country
United States
erttheking said:
KingsGambit said:
Isn't it only the feminists that didn't like The Killing Joke?
No, I'm pretty sure non-feminists thought that Batgirl having sex with someone who was a father figure was a fucking stupid idea. Doubly so when Batgirl remarks that the only reason she became Batgirl was that she wanted Batman's penis. I mean, fuck off, is that all you can come up with for her DC? Oh, and the bad guy they made up for it did all the stereotypical bad guy things, like asking Batgirl if she was on her period. Because "how rite womez?"

No, plenty of people hated it.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/batman_the_killing_joke/
Yeah. I mean, when Alan Moore didn't like the Killing Joke, in the written form he wrote, much less the poorly adapted cartoon, I'm pretty sure it isn't just the feminists who didn't like it.

Heck, Hbomb does a pretty good summation as the why the movie is "objectively" worse than the comic with barely any feminist criticism:
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Ezekiel said:
I've only seen her as Oracle in the Batman games and felt crippling her was a mistake. I like the idea of Batgirl starting as an envious outsider without Batman's approval, like in the cartoon. Making a costume out of what she can find and sow together herself.
erttheking said:
KingsGambit said:
Isn't it only the feminists that didn't like The Killing Joke?
No, I'm pretty sure non-feminists thought that Batgirl having sex with someone who was a father figure was a fucking stupid idea. Doubly so when Batgirl remarks that the only reason she became Batgirl was that she wanted Batman's penis. I mean, fuck off, is that all you can come up with for her DC? Oh, and the bad guy they made up for it did all the stereotypical bad guy things, like asking Batgirl if she was on her period. Because "how rite womez?"

No, plenty of people hated it.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/batman_the_killing_joke/
I'm surprised Batman Beyond doesn't get any crap for implying Bruce and Barbara had a relationship when they were young. Then again, the whole show felt like something other than Batman. It wasn't very good.
From what I've seen, it does. It just gets less crap because the implication is that they were both older, and in universe it was seen as a mistake. It still got crap, but still.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
KissingSunlight said:
It's good to see someone else liking Season 4 as well.
Yeah, I see it as a great blend of the show's inherent b-movie cheese, superbly realised post-Sunnydale High character development, and humour. Beer Bad was absolute dross (and Seth Green aside, I wasn't keen on some of the wolfie focused eps)... but like all Buffy eps (at least for me) it had a few really good lines or moments that just about make it worth viewing if you're going through a season. I think the most skippable S4 gets for me is Where The Wild Things Are. Though Giles' rebuke to the abusive puritan was satisfyingly cutting.

The storyline was trying too hard to be adult.
We'll agree to disagree on that one - though I'll return to one element where I feel that probably was the case. Well, not trying too hard to be adult, per se, just a tad misguided or tonally off.

The Big Bads in the last two seasons were pathetic. (The three nerds and incorporeal spirit of The First Evil)
Ah, but that's the thing; S6's was pretty much Life as the Big Bad... The trio were quite clearly distractions (that's how they're presented when they take turns testing/trolling Buffy), and I loved how they developed Andrew across the last two seasons (without the Troika and their 'banal evil', Storyteller couldn't have happened).

S6 was the most on the nose with its existentialism. Was it too much? To some, perhaps (I remember Sarah Michelle Gellar wasn't overly keen on how dark the show and her character got), but Buffy's always been a tonal tightrope that took risks. It may've sometimes stumbled (right from S1 up to S7), but I feel it always headed in the right direction and had the right intentions, and so managed to create some phenomenal TV at the same time.

After the Troika, S6 also pretty much had Willow as the Big Bad, as she struggled to cope with what her life and happenstance had thrown her way. Again, without S6 you couldn't have those rather beautiful, painful scenes between she and Giles at the start of S7 in England.

Honestly, I prefer Vamp Willow over Dark Willow.
Eh, maybe if it's Vamp Willow licking Willow-Willow[footnote]Disclaimer: that's a reference to an actual moment in the show, not me wackily shipping Willow with herself...[/footnote]. ;-) Clearly I loved the Darth Rosenberg line (pretty sure it was from Andrew, as well), and I enjoyed seeing her fall to the [Wicca] Dark Side. It was always teased that she was the most powerful amongst the group, and her fall certainly juxtaposed with the stereotypical wallflower she was introduced as. Edgy characters going off the deep end are fairly mundane, but with Willow I feel it had real (ahem... ) bite and pathos.

I simply hated the addiction storyline in Season 6. It completely hamstrung her character.
To throw back to the 'trying to hard' accusation: yeah, when that parallel started to dial up to 11, I really wasn't keen on it. However, I disagree it hamstrung the character; her 'fall' was pretty much stretched across several seasons (so it wasn't rushed), and the worst moments weren't flaying sociopaths alive, they were her betrayal of Tara and her friends. The addiction angle could get overbearing, but the arc still worked as character narrative, especially given those moments of very personal and private betrayal.

I didn't like the resolution in The Chosen. The burden of responsibility that Buffy struggled with, being the chosen one. She now puts that on millions of unsuspecting women. So, she can ride off in the sunset and do whatever she wants.
That's really not how the episode ended thematically, though. If an arc can be drawn for Buffy herself across the whole show, then that final shot and moment was she finally finding a resolution and a contentment - with her burden, and with her own choices. There was nothing in the dialogue or the shot that indicated she was simply about to kick back (it sets up another Hellmouth, and the storyline of maybe tracking down the other Slayers).

Seven years of death, slaughter, and heartache, and it ends on a half-smile. I loved that.

As for "unsuspecting women"? S8 does muddy the waters with reading that, but the show itself is absolutely unequivocal: BtVS had Joss's feminism hardbacked into its DNA (excuse the mixed metaphor... ), and so the final transition was from one woman having power, to a woman sharing power with other women. The moments they show of the other 'Chosen's' becoming active were all empowering. As a basic feminist statement, it was well earnt and, I felt, satisfying.

I will circle back and say I did like The Potentials better in the Season Eight comic books. However, near the end of that season, I was completely confused about what was happening and stopped reading them.
Yeah, as much as I looked forward to it, S8 was-- I dunno, maybe one of the worst things Joss has put his name to. It was incredibly misguided, and his note either at the end of S8 or the start of S9 admits that they tried some things and they didn't work, ergo a course correction was what was needed.

Still, it wasn't all bad; I bought them in TPB's, and Wolves At The Gate was superb. Only bought vol.1 of S9 years ago, but I do intend to go back and buy the rest.
 

09philj

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 31, 2015
2,154
948
118
If it's Cassandra Cain he might actually have to think about what he's doing and it could be pretty alright.

If not.. hoo boy.
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
Bedinsis said:
Marter said:
We saw her first (movie-wise) in the super-duper and amazingly fantastic live-action film Batman & Robin [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_%26_Robin_(film)][...]
Well, I for one am glad you enjoyed that movie; it is my understanding it was not appreciated by a large subset of the fans at the time of release.
That's because the fans didn't know what they were seeing. Batman and Robin is an amazing movie. Just like The Room, Samurai Cop, and Battlefield Earth.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
Synigma said:
Silentpony said:
Poor guy. If he keeps her like the comics, feminists will hate him all over again for not making her OP. If he changes her to be Buffy 2.0, comic fans will scream SJW.
Its a lose/lose. This'll be the nail in the coffin of his career.
I've heard it said, "when you declare yourself ideologically you kill yourself artistically" (actually it might even have been Joss saying it).
Pfui, it didn't stop Benjamin Disraeli.

Whedon has always had an explicit ideology, it comes up whenever someone asks "why do you write strong female characters?" which is all the time (sadly, no one asks him why he writes the exact same strong female character each time).
 

Synigma

New member
Dec 24, 2014
142
0
0
maninahat said:
Synigma said:
Silentpony said:
Poor guy. If he keeps her like the comics, feminists will hate him all over again for not making her OP. If he changes her to be Buffy 2.0, comic fans will scream SJW.
Its a lose/lose. This'll be the nail in the coffin of his career.
I've heard it said, "when you declare yourself ideologically you kill yourself artistically" (actually it might even have been Joss saying it).
Pfui, it didn't stop Benjamin Disraeli.

Whedon has always had an explicit ideology, it comes up whenever someone asks "why do you write strong female characters?" which is all the time (sadly, no one asks him why he writes the exact same strong female character each time).
Yeah... at this point I feel like we're getting a little too deep a look into his fetish...
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
Kyrian007 said:
I'm frankly surprised he's interested at all.
I suspect that Whedon was looking for a studio to fund his next project, and WB said that if he directed one of their Superhero movies, that they would fund his project. It's a common practice. However, I doubt his deal covers any more than one movie. Odds are he would have moved on if they wanted more than just this one.
 

PhoenixMaster

Regular Member
Apr 3, 2017
50
3
13
So long its not Zack Snyder directing it, my expectations for it just went from low to cautiously optimistic.
 

KissingSunlight

Molotov Cocktails, Anyone?
Jul 3, 2013
1,237
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
I agree with most of what you are saying. I will just address a few things that you have mentioned.

"Life" is the Big Bad of Season 6. I have heard people mention that before. I really don't like that explanation. It goes back my complaint that the writers tried too hard to make Buffy adult and they failed. I felt "Darth Rosenberg" was thrown in at the end of the season when the writers realize that the nerds wouldn't be able to provide an exciting final confrontation.

About Andrew, let's agree to disagree. In Season 7, I was rooting for him to get killed in every episode. I really just don't like that character. He was extremely annoying.

I understand the feminism message Joss was going for in Chosen. It works on that level. However, it was left vague on what Buffy was going to do afterwards. She could have gotten married, have kids, and retire from slaying.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
09philj said:
If it's Cassandra Cain he might actually have to think about what he's doing and it could be pretty alright.

If not.. hoo boy.
I've never read a story with Cassandra Cain in it, but I'd happily watch this movie if it was her. I've heard the concept of her character and it really interests me.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
maninahat said:
Whedon has always had an explicit ideology, it comes up whenever someone asks "why do you write strong female characters?" which is all the time (sadly, no one asks him why he writes the exact same strong female character each time).
Is there anything wrong with an ideology, explicit or no? And if we're playing 'which central thing ties all of his work together', it certainly wouldn't be feminism, it'd surely be humanism (the rather brilliant final scene between Vision and Ultron in AoU reads pretty much like Joss splitting himself right down the middle; hope and faith in humanity - tempered by wit and a very philosophical perspective - on one side, bitter cynicism and fatalism on the other).

And isn't his typical follow-up to that question 'Because you're still asking me that question'? It seems as good a retort as any to such an inane line.

Joss is an auteur, sure, and has written many characters over the decades. I think the accusation he simply repeats a single character is fairly ignorant, or just deeply - at times suspiciously - selective. Are we to judge only leads, for instance[footnote]If so, it's worth noting out of Buffy, Angel, Firefly, Dollhouse, Fray, it's only three female leads to two males - not exactly a crushing statistical victory for the sorority. Dr Horrible, The Avengers, Astonishing X-Men are all full on ensembles, though The Avengers and Dr Horrible feature more male characters, and Astonishing's probably about even.[/footnote]? If a creator whose, arguably, longest and deepest running motif is variations on the found family (Buffy, Firefly, Dollhouse, Astonishing X-Men, Fray, even The Avengers, which was why he was so perfect to helm that[footnote]In retrospect his 2004 forward for The Ultimates reads like a come-and-get-me plea to the future Marvel Studios; "These people are together because the world needs saving. And this flawed, bizarre group of mismatched myths is the only team in the world that can save it. And watching them do it is a glorious thing".[/footnote]), isn't it more productive to assess his ensembles instead, or female characters within those (if female characters must be focused on at all)?

It would take, for example, an alarmingly wayward piece of critique to suggest Dollhouse's Whiskey or Echo have much in common with, say, Fray's sister Erin, Buffy's Cordelia, Firefly's Kaylee, Astonishing X-Men's Emma Frost, Dr Horrible's Penny, The Avenger's Black Widow, and so on.

Synigma said:
Yeah... at this point I feel like we're getting a little too deep a look into his fetish...
I take it you habitually question all male writers if they stick to male characters - particularly male archetypes - then? Agendas and fetishes all around?

KissingSunlight said:
"Life" is the Big Bad of Season 6. I have heard people mention that before. I really don't like that explanation. It goes back my complaint that the writers tried too hard to make Buffy adult and they failed.
As I said, though, would you rather they didn't try at all?

I felt "Darth Rosenberg" was thrown in at the end of the season when the writers realize that the nerds wouldn't be able to provide an exciting final confrontation.
You know that wasn't the case, though, right? That show was known for planning multiple seasons ahead, sometimes in the most ingeniously subtle ways. The trio were never the real Big Bad (I never even thought so watching it as it unfolded).

About Andrew, let's agree to disagree. In Season 7, I was rooting for him to get killed in every episode. I really just don't like that character. He was extremely annoying.
You didn't even feel for him at the end of Storyteller? You're cold... ;-)

I understand the feminism message Joss was going for in Chosen. It works on that level. However, it was left vague on what Buffy was going to do afterwards. She could have gotten married, have kids, and retire from slaying.
For 'vague' I see open, and necessarily so. Dawn's last line and Buffy's half-smile denote possibilities, surely, which is something the character's not really had the luxury of since S1.
 

Kyrian007

Nemo saltat sobrius
Legacy
Mar 9, 2010
2,624
704
118
Kansas
Country
U.S.A.
Gender
Male
008Zulu said:
Kyrian007 said:
I'm frankly surprised he's interested at all.
I suspect that Whedon was looking for a studio to fund his next project, and WB said that if he directed one of their Superhero movies, that they would fund his project. It's a common practice. However, I doubt his deal covers any more than one movie. Odds are he would have moved on if they wanted more than just this one.
That's a great point, and I like the idea of Joss getting a new project funded, most likely whatever it is there's a good chance I'll be interested. Actually, I did think of this... but my initial reaction was "this is Whedon, I really doubt the guy that directed The Avengers has a problem getting a project funded." But you're right, that depends on the pitch and several of Whedon's projects must have sounded pretty crazy at the pitch phase.