Why compare Skyrim to a shitty Final Fantasy game, then? Compare it to 4, 5, 6, 7, or 9, all of which have been called the best in the series by countless people. Hell, why compare Skyrim to it? Stack up the games against Morrowind or Daggerfall, both of which are far better. I think the better FF's stack up quite well against the best Bethesda has to offer.jawakiller said:I dunno, seems like a no-brainer. Sykrim or shitty final fantasy 13? The decision overwhelms me. Or, Fallout 3 versus Kingdom Hearts? And yet another comparison, Borderla-ah, fuck it. This isn't even a contest.
I prefer JRPGs. Skies of Arcadia is my second-favorite game of all time, second only to Ocarina of Time, a game which itself has blatantly Japanese stylings and some of the elements you'll find in JRPGs. Most of the criticisms leveled against JRPGs seem absolutely baseless to me. The most absurd, by far, is that people don't like turn-based combat.
First of all, has no one heard of the Tales series? It's had real-time combat since its inception nearly two decades ago, and it's a major player. Secondly, why don't people like turn-based combat? How can anyone just dismiss an entire mechanic like that? Turn-based combat is absolutely basic to RPGs.
Criticisms of JRPGs strike me as either 1.) archaic or 2.) indicative of a level of closed-mindedness that doesn't warrant the definitive proclamations JRPG-haters like to spew.
I dare anyone to objectively evaluate Phantasy Star I, II, and IV, and not come to the conclusion that JRPGs, anime hair and all, can be deep, engaging, and exceedingly well-executed.
I should add that while I'm partial to JRPGs, my second-favorite RPG is Morrowind. Now THAT is a good game, one any game developer would rightly be proud of.