I'm not gonna watch a 9 hour video, dude, just to find out you've embellished or made something up.Pretty sure I saw it on the Rekieta Law livestream of the final day of the trial so best I could do easily is give you the video link
Who cares? Rights weren't infringed. No grounds for mistrial whatsoever.Except it was being inferred as a sign of guilt enough that even the judge chose to step in and admonish the prosecution for it.
I don't care if you think it's a good "plan" or not. Completely irrelevant. Nothing improper happened at all. The prosecution just asked a question, which is their job.By trying to claim he was only after attention / money.......... when his evidence are photographs.........hardly the greatest plan to discredit the photos there.
OK, so a few minutes later the witness clarifies that all that happened was the prosecution asked him if he wanted to add anything. That's literally all. Not even anything regarding Rittenhouse.
Big pile of nothing, which hacks like Cheong have tried to blow up into a scandal because they don't have the faintest clue about law.