Based on what I've read, it appears that the searches were attributed to her mother. Though why her mother would be looking up chloroform confuses me.rhizhim said:
Jury rules Casey Anthony Not Guilty
- Thread starter HumpinHop
- Start date
Recommended Videos
- Mar 31, 2010
- 7,172
- 150
- 68
- Country
-
- Gender
-
Because evidently you know far more about the case than the jury who had to sit through 33 days of testimony.Cormitt said:
OT: Being British, I have heard very little about this case so I haven't seen enough to make up my mind, but either way its tragic that such an adorable little girl had her life cut short. I hope that the jury have made the right decision today as if the mother is guilty then she derserves far more punishment than we could ever give her.
Being found guilty would probably have been better for her. She would have gone to prison, may or may not have gotten the death penalty, may or may not have even lived long. No, now she has to go back outside to a world that has seen her face plastered all over the place as the "woman who allegedly killed her child and tried to cover it up". You try getting a job like that. Sure, she could write a memoir, and people will buy it, but even OJ's estate went to shit because everyone knew he did it.
This woman's life is screwed regardless. Did she get away with it, perhaps. Is she going to feel the repercussions to her dying day. Most likely. I would not wish this woman's future misery on my own worst enemy.
This woman's life is screwed regardless. Did she get away with it, perhaps. Is she going to feel the repercussions to her dying day. Most likely. I would not wish this woman's future misery on my own worst enemy.
Chloroform is not exactly that much of an exotic thing if I compare it to my list of Google searches in the last few daysJoel Dawson said:
Pretty sure it says the in the news report that the cause of death couldn't be determined,so how you know it was a snapped neck I don't know, but maybe you should bring that evidence to light.HumpinHop said:
OT: Everyone here is going off on one about how this is a miscarriage of justice and crying out about the state of the legal system. Thing is: No one here know the true facts, no one here was in that courtroom, no one here saw the evidence.
A jury said she wasn't guilty, and that's it. They must have had good reasons to declare her not guilty. Now, I'm not saying that she definitely didn't do it, but I am saying that she was found innocent, so stop treating her as if she is definitely guilty. Plus it's better to let someone guilty off than to lock someone innocent up.
So does mine, but because I accidently left chicken in my car on a hot summer afternoon.cyrogeist said:
I guess they couldn't prove she did it. Not to say they didn't have evidence, but the US criminal justice system is supposed to work on that absolutism. If there's a sliver if reasonable doubt, it doesn't matter what the balance of probabilities is, a jury has to acquit. They might have made a convincing case, but if it's a case with holes in in sufficient to make one doubt the defendant's guilt, then acquittal is supposed to occur.
I been hearing about this shit for three years. I live in Central Florida, and not a day has gone by when I haven't heard something on the news about this story. Honestly, I'm glad the end's in sight, because it means an end to the endless vomit the media keeps spewing out about this whole ordeal.
And frankly, the verdict doesn't surprise me at all. The prosecution proved nothing other than "Casey lied to the cops." I'm still waiting for the jurors to talk about what exactly happened in deliberations, but I'm glad that prosecution didn't get a conviction on such flimsy evidence.
And frankly, the verdict doesn't surprise me at all. The prosecution proved nothing other than "Casey lied to the cops." I'm still waiting for the jurors to talk about what exactly happened in deliberations, but I'm glad that prosecution didn't get a conviction on such flimsy evidence.
It's a court of law, not a public stoning. She's had her day in court and found to be not guilty so people should now just shut the hell up and accept it. I know that's hard for mothers with high maternal instincts but too bad, they're just going to have to suck it up, and it's not like the private affairs of other people are really any of their business anyway. It's between her, the people who it directly affects and the courts, and nobody else - despite how the media may make it seem. People who believe in the idea of vigilante justice should move to some dodgy country where they can stone people to death on suspicion alone. In the meantime civilised people in proper countries will use the court system and accept both the process and the results that it produces, even if they don't happen to always like it.HumpinHop said:
Anyone that bitter about it should rest assured that she'll probably do time for the other charges anyway, and baby-killers (even if they're innocent) tend to do time pretty rough.
Anyone making judgements on her in this thread is a fool (at best). You weren't there, you didn't see the evidence, you have no right to judge anyone. The court deliberated for days on the verdict, which means that they were given a hell of a lot of information to think about and consider. A hell of a lot of information that you mostly don't even have access to. Think about that before you post something that makes you look like a vigilante.
Think about it in the context of the trial, it makes 100% complete and perfect sense.The Lesbian Flower said:
She's been having people tell her about the gruesome details of the child's death for years now, probably ever since the incident, probably on a daily basis too. She's heard it before, likely hundreds of times. She probably had a reaction the first 50 times but it's like listening to a song the radio plays to death or a broken record - hear it enough goddamn times and after a while it just doesn't move you at all anymore. On the other hand, the verdict is crunch time. She's shitting herself and you would be too, no matter how innocent/guilty you were, especially after all those months of buildup.
She done killed her 2 year old!aba1 said:
This reminds me of that American Dad episode where Stan is on jury duty.
She had her day in court and the prosecution failed to prove that she killed her daughter because they basically had no solid evidence proving she did. The prosecutions job is to provide te evidence and frankly the evidence they brought was rather weak.
I'm going to quote my post from the other thread, since this seems to be the more active one.
This was a death penalty case. They shouldn't be executing people in the first case, but if the government is going to do it, they'd better be damned sure that the person is actually guilty. There was too much reason to doubt that she committed murder.Owyn_Merrilin said:
You know the case has been ongoing for 3 years? As guilty as she may seem, if you weren't in the courtroom, and all the knowledge you have of this case was spoon fed to you by the media, you aren't in the position to pass judgement along about what should have happened to this woman.Hatchet90 said:
Do I think she's not guilty? No. But do I go around spouting that "this ***** deserves to die in prison" even though I don't know the entire story? Also no.
What I'm trying to say is that I hate it when the media ends cases like this before they even begin. Please, try to imagine if Casey Anthony was somehow innocent. She probably isn't but imagine she is. She now has to live with one eye over her shoulder, in fear of getting stabbed in the back at any given time.
The evidence against her was circumstantial at most. Nothing concrete existed, but the way the mass media twisted it, this was an open and shut case that she managed to worm out of through sheer bitchery. The legal system may be fucked yes, and we may go by the insanely stupid guidelines of "Letting 1000 guilty men run free rather than one innocent man go to jail", but that's just how it is.
If you want to see a prime example of this, go over to MSNBC, and catch the latest episode of Nancy Grace. Almost every caller on the show was vehemently oppposed to Casey and they were deadset on her being guilty from the start. From a ratings standpoint though you can't draw in a lot of viewers playing defensive. Aggression means passion and angry callers, all of which attract viewers. Eh, what do you do though, that's why I could barely follow the story at all.Turtleboy1017 said:
Screw Karma! I hope Noob Saibot finds that cold hearted, unfeeling *****!Caramel Frappe said:
The defense was so weak and pathetic. How did she get off!?! HOW!?
Seriously I have nothing more to say for the state of Florida...
Take it away Noob
