- May 25, 2010
Hmm, you know what, she's actually kinda hot.
Could be "wrong", could be somebody who simply shuts down outward displays of emotional response under stress, and breaks up when she realises that the whole thing is over. Or any other explanation really.The Lesbian Flower said:She had absolutely no reaction when the defense was telling how gruesome her child's death was and describing it in great detail but was in tears during her verdict. That doesn't seem right.
I really just have one thing to say in response:Katana314 said:I'm fine with it. I'll consider the facts...
- This woman is scarred by the media for life, and may not be able to show her face to anyone around her again
- She certainly lied, but it's certainly possible she's innocent. SOMETHING convinced the jury. Keep in mind, readers of this article haven't seen all the facts. The media may not have seen all the facts. The jury has.
- If she IS guilty, this woman is not at all likely to kill someone again, especially after this whole trial. The purpose of criminal justice is not for the dead to assume revenge; it is to act as a deterrent against further crimes. Problem solved.
- If she IS guilty, no mother could live without horrible nightmares of her moment of anger.
There, all said and done. No reason for anyone to worry about it anymore.