Scizophrenic Llama said:
For the most part: People want to justify why they spent $1,200 on a PC versus $200-300 on a console.
PC does have the technical concept that nearly every game has potential to have limitless content if the community is determined enough to add to it. That doesn't make it the master race though.
Sorry, buddy, I don't do my PC gaming on overpriced Apple garbage (OOOO, THIS THREAD JUST WENT META). $1,200 for a gaming PC? Please. If I wanted to put together a gaming machine that plays games comparably to a $300 console, I'd have to pay...
About $300. Fact is, desktop PC's are not that expensive if you know how to use a screwdriver (I'm stealing that forever, by the way). You can get a bare-bones rig for about $150, and a mid-range graphics card for roughly the same. Considering that a mid-range card in the year 2011 is orders of magnitude more powerful than the semi-high-end graphic chips that the consoles have had since 2006-ish, you're talking about a vastly superior machine for the same cost.
PC's do come with their own failings. Most of them, though, really boil down to how much effort you're willing to put forth, and how much common sense you have; I use my computer for more than just games - for instance, I'm using it right now to surf the internet. Of course, since I have some common sense, I have antivirus software on it, and tend not to click on every cute-looking piece of malware. Sweeping generalization? Not really, but that kind of scrutiny is part of the upkeep of a computer. Little things like that can become annoyances, and if all you want is to pop a game in and play it, then a console is more for you. This is to say nothing of console exclusives.
I'm not an elitist, but I do recognize that the PC is, if you're willing to show it the love and give it the protection it needs, an objectively more powerful platform.