Agent_Z said:
You think most of the MCU villains were household names?
Most of the MCU
heroes weren't even household names.
Why should this be an issue at all.
Should, or will? It shouldn't be an issue. DC is assembling some of the best known heroes in comic history in a single movie. What could go wrong? They already did wonderfully with their big three, putting them in a movie that was so well-received it set a record in its second week by sinking the hardest a movie has ever sunk.
You may have noticed, but DC is not Marvel. Marvel took a bunch of B-D listers and made them successful in their own right, and then brought them together for a crossover the likes of which we really haven't seen before. DC led with its three strongest properties and....
Well, I'm sure you know the results.
We're talking about different circumstances, different companies, different models, different buildups, and different writers. Why should we assume the same outcome when provided not only with a poor track record, but also when so many factors are different?