If you simplify it down without context sure. But then again, you can simplify the plot of Bioshock down to a dumbass having daddy issues if you want to.Kibeth41 said:Most of what you listed is literally linked to delays, and then stating it as the reason that it's a bad game. Thus, mouth breathers who think "delays = bad game".Redryhno said:Come now, you can use better words to describe those that think differently than you than "mouth breathers". Also cut the crap, nobody says "delays = bad game", but they do say "multiple delays, multiple missed promised dates on everything from beta builds to demos, and a lack of communication until the previously set ship dates three times now, and routinely leaving the same date up on their steam page for pre-purchase without that news anywhere on the page = a high chance of it being a shit game".
People whined with CDPR last year with the Witcher3 delay, but that was more because they didn't get ot play it than anything inheretly in the "delays = bad game" camp as you're trying to paint here
There's no evidence that it's a bad game, yet. The gameplay actually looks quite fun. The graphics were downgraded, but that happens to most games. It's also to be expected considering they set the scope too high.
And the point of my comment was to identify reasons as to why a sequel would be better.
I mean, you did see the "lack of communication multiple times on multiple things" bit right?