This is where we disagree. If the "children" aren't harming anyone (else), and their parents approve, or at least don't object, then why do they need any restrictions? Their school performance is the business of the child and the parent.Robert0288 said:If children under 15 are being allowed to go and do what ever they please, to the effect that its damaging their performance of school and is wide spread enough that the government is taking notice, then the government should step in as parents are obviously failing in their paternal duties.
This is the same, knee jerk, nanny state bollox that is brought up by EVERY generation. As soon as one group of old people step out of office another group of old people step in. The refrain goes like this "We didn't have this when we were kids and we turned out fine. We don't understand this /thing/ so we fear it. We have power so we will impose that power on those who don't have power, just like the previous generation did to us."
witches
records
radio
swing dancing
communism
television
rock and roll
comic books
dungeons and dragons
heavy metal
and now video games
All moral panics, the country is different but the actions are the same.
Governments need to stick to figuring out the most efficient way of providing non-rivalrous non-exclusive public goods and leave the parenting to the parents.