. . . My computer can't display it :'(SmashLovesTitanQuest said:NO!!! NEVER!!!
![]()
LOOK AT THESE GRAPHICS! LOOK AT THEM!!!
. . . My computer can't display it :'(SmashLovesTitanQuest said:NO!!! NEVER!!!
![]()
LOOK AT THESE GRAPHICS! LOOK AT THEM!!!
Do you enjoy a good flamestorm?CrunkParty said:Wow. What could you guys possibly be talking about for 13 pages? This isn't that big or complex an issue and coming from the guy who made a Hipsters vs Kvltists thread that's saying something. I'm so tempted to read the entire thread. Someone please please please talk me into it.
I agree 100%.VeneratedWulfen93 said:I play 40k and that is ridiculously expensive.
My daddy is buying me a PC for christmas (and before people make smarmy remarks, I'm 27 and living on my own. Daddy however doesn't mind me calling him that <3) and he's doing it so we can play some games together.Vigormortis said:Actually, if you really had read through most of the posts, you'd have noticed that a vast majority of the self-proclaimed PC gamers on here have been the most well-mannered and open of the posters.chinangel said:snip
In fact, most of the confrontational posts, like the one quoted from you, have been from the console players. Kind of telling about this whole discussion. (though, sad to say, there have been one or two rather obnoxious PC commentors)
I have to ask: Do you not see the issue of lambasting PC gamers for be "prejudiced" towards consoles and console gamers, simply on principle, when you yourself are "prejudiced" towards PCs and PC gamers for the very same reason? How does that not make you just as guilty as the "PC elitists" you revile so much?
You can make all the claims you want about PC gamers being "mean" to you for your choice of gaming platform, but don't expect any sympathies when you do the same to them.
. . . . . . . . .
On a side note, however, I have to add a few things.
Firstly, you can build a decent PC today for between $300 and $400 that is vastly more powerful and vastly more capable than any of the current-gen consoles. So your "$700" is quite an exaggeration.
Secondly, I'm not sure what kind of computers your familiar with, but I don't need dozens of different programs to "help it run". All I need is an operating system and a few drivers, same as a console requires. Likewise, any superfluous programs I might use (not require) don't require monthly fees. The only case I can think of a software package, used for gaming, requiring a monthly fee is, ironically, Xbox Live.
Now, no one will argue that buying a PC is, initially, a little more expensive than buying a console. However, over the course of owning either system, you will end up saving a hell of a lot more money with a PC than you ever will with a console.
The increased costs of games, services, peripherals, etc you find on consoles add up quite quickly. Given both the lower costs of ownership and increased number of services available on PC, PCs end up being cheaper for gaming than consoles.
As for being "hacked" or acquiring viruses, well...that's on the user. If you practice safe internet surfing then you'll be fine.
Your comment on the "general unpleasantness of the PC community" is not only an inflammatory generalization, it's just rude. There's no call for that. Not if we all want a have a conversation and not an argument.
. . . . . . . . .
All that said, I don't care what platform someone games on. What ever platform suits your needs or proves to be more fun should be the one you use. Regardless of it's "pros" and "cons".
You prefer one of the consoles? Great! Good for you. It's no skin off my bones. Hell, if it's an Xbox360 or a Wii perhaps we can play something together. God knows I wouldn't mind an excuse to start using my Xbox again.
Still, though you seem dead-fast in your hatred of PC gaming, I wouldn't mind introducing you to the wonders held within. There are a lot of great games to be enjoyed on the PC.
If you ever change your mind, I know of a few really great TF2 servers.
Perhaps, but that's still no excuse to act that way. Especially if we, the PC gamers, are going to rid ourselves of the "elitist" image.Mycroft Holmes said:Being a dick isn't the same as trolling.
Come on man. We can do better!
Fair enough. The TF2 offer wasn't the only thing from PC gaming I was referring to. It was simply a small example tossed into the friendly gesture.chinangel said:My daddy is buying me a PC for christmas (and before people make smarmy remarks, I'm 27 and living on my own. Daddy however doesn't mind me calling him that <3) and he's doing it so we can play some games together.
While I do thank you for the offer, I will politely decline the TF2 thing...mostly because i"m not really interested in it. I've played the game before and It's not really my thing, sorry.
True, but then again you'll have to "fork out...large sums of money" for the new consoles when they release. Far more than you'd pay for the current gen consoles. So really, it's a fair comparison.Archangel357 said:Yeah, but spending $400 NOW to own a rig which is more powerful than a seven year old console doesn't strike me as a particularly wise investment. If you want something that will make the upcoming consoles look bad, you're gonna have to fork out rather larger sums of money.
Compatibility issues are par for the course when you have so many different hardware manufacturers making so many different parts for each individual PC. I was never dismissing that point.An operating system which is full of bugs, and drivers which often suffer from compatibility issues. I tried EVERYTHING, and I never could get certain sound issues with Command & Conquer 3 fixed. My PS3? Yeah, the firmware updates are annoying - but so are the OS/antivirus/Java/Flash/nVidia/media player/general programme updates that my PC gets hit with, every other day - and I've never had issues which broke a game for me, like it happened on my last PC with Half-Life 2.
Your list isn't exactly fair, is it? I mean, you add buying software packages like MS Office towards the price of a gaming PC. Does your console run MS Office?Right. My laptop cost me ?1,000, four years ago. My PS3 cost me ?600, also about four years ago. Add to that my gaming mouse, my PC gamepad, my headset, my speakers, my external HDDs, that's another ?450 or so for the PC. Add programmes like MS Office or some such into the mix, and the price goes up again by triple digits. What exactly are the peripherals driving up my PS3's price again? My ?30 bluetooth headset? With the average price difference between new AAA PC and console titles being ?10 or so, that price difference pays for a helluva lot of more expensive games.
Since learning how to safely surf the web, I've only been hit once by malware over the course of my last three PCs. Even then, it was because of my carelessness.Not really. You can be careful, but sometimes, you will get hit, and there will be very little you could have done to prevent it. Maybe your firewall was set to update that night, but that new trojan or rootkit was lurking in some corner of the internet already while you mistakenly clicked on that stupid banner ad while on a filesharing site or something. Shit happens. Name one person who uses a PC regularly who's never had some malware infection.
I never said PCs were perfect. Nor did I say consoles are inherently bad. I was simply pointing out the false claims people often make to belittle PC gamers and PC gaming. Same as I would if someone was making false claims against consoles.Let's not be wilfully blind here. I own a PS3 and a PC, and I am aware of both systems' shortcomings - yet I still love them. A world without Civ V or To the Moon is as empty to me as is a world without Uncharted and God of War. But I do know that both systems have their very own problems, and a huge number of them, too.
Surely then, no one should even own a PS3, what with Sony's problems? [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2011/jan/07/playstation-3-hack-ps3] The user didn't even need to have done anything.Archangel357 said:No, it isn't, but it can only happen on a PC. See the difference? If you are discussing the pros and cons of, say, taking a bus to your destination or riding a dirtbike cross-country to it, you cannot dismiss the notion that one might fall off the latter by saying that the rider should have been more careful. The entire point is that with a bus, you CANNOT fall off it, but with a dirtbike, you CAN. It's not about who is at fault, it is about the presence of a risk.Since learning how to safely surf the web, I've only been hit once by malware over the course of my last three PCs. Even then, it was because of my carelessness.
Clicking on a banner ad, by the way, is on the user. That's not the PCs fault.
wow do you feel better now? one of the major problems that gets is that the community are inconsiderate dicks who cannot socialize properly with other people. boy am i glad there is no such thing in the pc community /sarcasmSanat said:Jeez, I wonder WHY they bash you so very hard about having a seriously inferior, overpriced, inconvenient, technologically obsolete and locked down system.
And just so that you're aware, if you're not already:
Consoles are the cause for all the bad things in the industry. Not for the industry mind you, but in the industry. What we game-playing folk want.
TL;DR: Fuck consoles.
To be entirely honest, Consoles, especially this generation, have had their own sets of problems along those lines that an experienced PC user won't have.Archangel357 said:Not the SAME things. Let's be honest here. Saying that compatibility issues just come with the territory is basically just proving my point - due to the fact that console hardware is set in stone, certain problems simply do not occur. That, no matter how you cut it, is a point in the consoles' favour - yes, a mandatory software update is annoying, but at least, you know that afterwards, the game will run properly. With PC games, that can be a crapshoot.
I believe he's talking about the cost of making a PC as a dedicated gaming platform, like you'd use your console for. $300-$400 on hardware, and no need for MSOffice. If you buy 10 or more games, you'll make up the difference in cost between a console and PC thanks to PC games generally being $10 cheaper in retail than console games.It is fair because of how the machines are used. VERY few people have the kind of money where they can use a PC just for gaming. My PC is used as a media platform, a work instrument, and a storage device - like most people's are, I would assume. It's as though one was comparing the benefits of a light truck to those of a sports saloon, and one would call it unfair to add the price of a trailer to that of the truck. Well, maybe, but you do need one to get the full use out of it.
I'd equate it more to having to buy Windows for the PC. Both are required to use said item, and both have other functions. Buying Microsoft Office is more akin to paying for cable TV. Its an extra use for the thing your gaming platform is dependent on, that costs more but is in no way necessary.The idea of adding the price of one's TV to that of the console is silly. The TV is not a console peripheral: it serves its own purpose, after all. At that point, I could add the cost of a desk to that of the PC.
And on consoles there is the very real risk that their network will be hacked and your personal data stolen. Yes this can happen on the PC too, but unless you're careless its rare.No, it isn't, but it can only happen on a PC. See the difference? If you are discussing the pros and cons of, say, taking a bus to your destination or riding a dirtbike cross-country to it, you cannot dismiss the notion that one might fall off the latter by saying that the rider should have been more careful. The entire point is that with a bus, you CANNOT fall off it, but with a dirtbike, you CAN. It's not about who is at fault, it is about the presence of a risk.
I'd just like to shower you with love for your choice of avatar (I have an image of Gwynplaine as my current phone backgroundO maestre said:*snip*
I'm actually pretty sure that PCs are also subject to their parts breaking or working improperly. Granted, they won't display an actual red ring of death, but that's just semantics.Joccaren said:As an example, the Red Ring of Death on early Xboxs. Not something PC has to worry about.
PC parts can break down, but that's generally due whoever built it not paying attention to heat and airflow - which anything you buy in store will generally be fine for, and if you build it yourself its your fault that it failed. Even with heat problems most of the time, in my experience, the PC just crashes, and you can continue to use the card later, usually after letting it cool down a bit. Faulty parts are occasionally sold, but in general you'll notice within the 6 months to a year+ that the warranty lasts for, and be able to get a new one, and even this can be avoided the vast majority of the time by buying from reliable brands.Jordy Hartog said:I'm actually pretty sure that PCs are also subject to their parts breaking or working improperly. Granted, they won't display an actual red ring of death, but that's just semantics.Joccaren said:As an example, the Red Ring of Death on early Xboxs. Not something PC has to worry about.