So like actual war right, no inhibitions, no holds bar, no sympathy, no wishing to fuck the other, no care for future society just pure warring hatred and indifference?
Men of course.
Are you kidding? We would fucking murder and slaughter you all I mean c'mon are you joking.
Youd probably get a good 2/5 of us but c'mon seriously its not even a debate really.
Men are monsters in human clothing is all I can say.
In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.
But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
But usually when it comes to fighting guerrilla style your on the defensive. Now if woman where to get the advantage they could keep it if they don't have to worry about men advancing. Then their bolster of numbers would only get bigger as the men have to sit on their thumbs.
So likely unless men where to turn the tide of the war to their side quickly in the beginning woman would again likely win.
In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.
But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
But usually when it comes to fighting guerrilla style your on the defensive. Now if woman where to get the advantage they could keep it if they don't have to worry about men advancing. Then their bolster of numbers would only get bigger as the men have to sit on their thumbs.
So likely unless men where to turn the tide of the war to their side quickly in the beginning woman would again likely win.
Hm. We would also have to take into account the various women that might not want to part with their male children ('cause the marrow-sperm will bring about either or gender, and taking into account the maternal instincts), so there might be a chance for spies. The more feminine men would survive and thrive and be potential allies for the men.
When speaking about replenishing numbers, none of you seem to remember that it takes 18 years to reach adulthood in most parts of the world. Even if you dropped it to, say, 15, it would still be 16 years to raise said child into a fully mature combatant. World War II didn't last a third of that (if you're Amurikan) and that was with the standard rifle being a bolt action.
Besides, what mother would let her children do that so young?
Women have the advantage in replenishing numbers? Hardly. They're going to kill off 1/2 of their children because they're men and the remaining females will be raised with no strong male influence. Their combat prowess will be weaksauce and their loins will burn when they encounter our rugged manliness.
Even if they didn't kill of their male offspring, they will be raised as pansies. Clearly more interested in tea time than taking the life of a fellow man. Bunch of mommas boys!
Plus we can just take prisoners of war and keep our numbers up that way.
In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.
But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
But usually when it comes to fighting guerrilla style your on the defensive. Now if woman where to get the advantage they could keep it if they don't have to worry about men advancing. Then their bolster of numbers would only get bigger as the men have to sit on their thumbs.
So likely unless men where to turn the tide of the war to their side quickly in the beginning woman would again likely win.
Hm. We would also have to take into account the various women that might not want to part with their male children ('cause the marrow-sperm will bring about either or gender, and taking into account the maternal instincts), so there might be a chance for spies. The more feminine men would survive and thrive and be potential allies for the men.
But they would keep the children. The point of the war is not to wipe the other out but to rule them.
Again the marrow thing is not needed is one man can impregnate hundreds of woman in mere months. hell don't even need sex just milk them and you can farm sperm.
I don't know about physically beating you, but I'm pretty sure women will leave you with some emotional scars. You may win the war gentlemen, but years of therapy will never fix you... MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
I replaced my need for men with a step ladder, gameboy, and tap jars to break the seal before opening. On top of this, I have a big heavy book called, "how to kill insects"
***** WHO CARES IF I LEFT THE LID UP! JUST LOOK BEFORE YOU SIT!
Also, I never understood what it is with girls/women and temperature. "It's cooold" " "It's sooo cooooold" "It's too cooold" "Turn the heeeattt uppp". Read those in a whiny teenage girl voice, and that's half of what every girl I know ever says. And also that she's wearing a tiny little outfit when it's 50 degrees out. No shitting wonder you're cold.
And we don't get periods either!
And the sex too. We don't need to spend at least half an hour getting everything right. And women need to do it just right to feel good about it, and if you don't do it exactly right the whole night is ruined. Men, as SMBC Theater said, all you need to do is "Touch him on the penis".
And CK Lewis had a nice thing to say about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTrCBcrFMCI
And finally, a man will never friendzone a woman.
captcha: nut case. describes every girl I know in some way.
I replaced my need for men with a step ladder, gameboy, and tap jars to break the seal before opening. On top of this, I have a big heavy book called, "how to kill insects"
No way. Barbeque is the one realm of cooking that is squarely in man territory. It has two things that men love and are awesome at; red meat and fire. I barbeque and I've never poisoned anyone... accidentally.
DigitalSushi said:
We can't hold our pee in, as a direct result of us being hardcore standing up pissing machines.
Girls can't throw though, watching girls playing baseball is shameful.
Seriously? Have you ever been on a long road trip with a woman? It goes something like this:
Woman: I have to stop and use the restroom.
Man: Okay.
-20 minutes later-
Woman: Can you stop? I have to pee.
Man: Really? Again? Ugh, fine.
-20 minutes later-
Woman: I can't hold it in any longer.
Man: Are you for real?! You didn't even drink anything. Un-fucking-believable!
-Repeat for the next 500 miles-
The baseball thing is true, though. It's just hilarious.
DigitalSushi said:
We need women to make more men though, also the male genetic code is starting to break, you know the Y chromosome is smaller and has less genetic detail I think.
What? Since when? The Y chromosome has been around for an awfully long time. So, after millions of years it's just now breaking? Balderdash! Pure poppycock, I say! I've had my Y chromosome examined, and it's doing a fantastic job.
unrealistically and for the sake of keeping the thread interesting: we lose because they will bat their eyelashes and 3/4 of our beta-male army will be forever hypnotized.
I for one support our new female overlords, once I help them wipe out all other men the species will need continuation of course
No but seriously they'd stand no chance.
I think males would probably win if it came to outright war, as on average we are stronger & more likely to be into sports than women, also we'd have most members of the military. If it came to a cold war though, I've no doubt women would win by espionage.
So really, it's a dare battle. Who can hold out long enough without caving to save our race...so it will probably end with a mutually beneficial agreement slightly favoring the women in a way that us men don't notice until it's too late.
What? Since when? The Y chromosome has been around for an awfully long time. So, after millions of years it's just now breaking? Balderdash! Pure poppycock, I say! I've had my Y chromosome examined, and it's doing a fantastic job.
It's from a study published in 2008 that was only recently disproved, also that's one damn impressive chromosome you have there! Have you had much success in passing it on?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
