Guess we're just going to have to disagree. I never felt that the old formula was getting stale, especially when REmake innovated and shaped up much of it. It's evident that we like the series for completely different reasons.stroopwafel said:al4674 said:I don't feel the series has evolved naturally, because the new games are nothing like the old ones. A natural evolution would have been the REmake and RE0, though that game also had its problems. The change was quick and fast and was based on the assumption that opening up the game to a wider playerbase wouldn't alienate the core fans. The assumption was wrong and the over-the-shoulder approach has saturated itself faster than the original formula.
Resident Evil changed b/c the old formula(atleast at the time) was getting stale. You had Resident Evil, then RE2, 3, Code Veronica, Resident Evil Remake, RE0. All these games played more or less the same, so they shook things up with Resident Evil 4. It was a completely different game that not only revolutionized third person shooters but also had a signature style and atmosphere that's barely been matched to this day. Not the awkward puzzles, tedious inventory management, cringeworthy dialogue or B-movie cheese has been the series appeal for me, but rather that haunting atmosphere and never really quite knowing what was around the next corner is what did it for me. And RE4 reveled in this, and was a lot more fun to play as well.
I'd say it was very much a natural evolution of the series, but the thing is Capcom completely misunderstood what made RE4 so good in the first place. That's why we have such garbage sequels to the game.
In any case, lets hope RE7 is better than RE 5 and 6.