DerangedHobo said:
mip0 said:
At first I was going to say something like: "What do I have left? Well, I can still laugh. There's music, movies, games and I might even have a few friends left who have also chosen to let go."
But once you acknowledge that life is one big act of futility, one collective piss in the wind how can you enjoy it? Things like self improvement, work, education become irrational acts which is just killing time until you die. Hedonism seems like the only answer or solution but then life boils down to trying to get your next fix of drugs so you feel better. That's what it seems like to me at least.
Yes, hedonism... Is it possible to live as a hedonist for, say, 30 years without resorting to drugs? Are ordinary hedonistic activities enough to satisfy one's needs for such a long time? (Take "ordinary" to mean legal.)
Can raising children be a hedonistic activity? Can it be satisfying to someone who has realized that there is, ultimately, no point in anything? I read a bit about hedonism on Wikipedia. In the section about the "ultra-hedonist" school called the Cyrenaic school, it says: "They did, however, recognize the value of social obligation, and that pleasure could be gained from altruism[citation needed].". (Altruism is the opposite of egoism.)
Perhaps this is the best thing that could happen: We take some drug that's just amazing (I've heard there are many drugs that are amazing the first time you take them) and when we're at the absolute peak, someone takes a gun and shots us in the head from behind.
Have you been there? If you have, did you learn from your mistakes? How does one prevent it?
I've been there and I probably still am there, regarding preventing it I'd say find better distractions if you can't rationalize. I can't say I've learnt from my mistakes but I can say that having people around helps.
(...)if you don't spend time talking to other people, you will go psychotic(...)
Here: http://everything2.com/title/Humans+are+pack+animals
It's connected to this:
Imperioratorex Caprae said:
(...)
Once ego takes over and you no longer trust any opinion other than your own, then you've not the perspective to know whether you're right or wrong. You can't see yourself from an outsider's perspective, no matter how smart you are.
(...)
I have to agree. For a very long time I've only rarely been talking to people. When I do say something to someone I don't know whether they'll smile or punch me in response. We get a better idea of what's right and wrong the more people we talk to. It's just like how a statistical mean value is considered better if it has been computed from a larger amount of samples. Of course, these samples have to be random. In the same way, it must be important that there is a great diversity among the people we talk to.
It might even be essential for our society to function. For some people to get what they want, others have to compromise or give up completely
I don't know if I'm taking this quote out of context but it's pretty obvious that our society is built off of the misery of others. Capitalism alone has 5 year olds digging in a ditch in africa for minerals and people in sweat shops mass producing clothes.
Well, it's a tiny bit out of context. It's connected to the last question. I know some people live in misery for the benefit of others, but is it really misery or have they grown accustomed to it? Is it essential to our society that they DO grow accustomed to it? Otherwise they'd be constantly revolting, I guess. Also, you kind of answered this question when you answered the last one:
Can we grow accustomed to any situation, if only we stay in that situation long enough?
I'd say it depends on the person but yeah, humans are a resiliant bunch and they can probably survive most horrific situations.
The way I see it we're the lucky losers, born high enough that we aren't in sweat shops but low enough that we're just cogs in the machine.
Those who are born higher than us and aren't cogs in the machine, do they really have it better than us? Imagine that this is the second life we live and that we have only forgotten about the previous life we lived. Imagine that this previous life took place at the same point in history as this one. Imagine that in this previous life, we were part of the "lucky winners", born so high that we weren't even cogs in the machine. Now, imagine that when we die this time, we regain our memories of our previous lives, so that we remember both lives simultaneously. Lastly, imagine that we must choose to re-live one of these two lives. Would it be an easy choice?
I enjoyed reading your reply and I wouldn't hesitate to read your next reply. Thank you!