I can't help but wonder who green lit this entire thing.
To be entirely honest, it seems to me that it's a "hip" thing for porn starlets who achieve a following, but get too old to keep doing movies, to come out and claim they were forced or otherwise tricked into that kind of career/lifestyle. Then they sell the hard luck story/expose. The whole anti-porn advocacy thing isn't new, when I was in school we had people going around speaking about it, right alongside the anti-drug junk.
Now, I'm not going to say that there aren't people forced into the sex trade. Human trafficing, white slavery, and similar things all exist. I on the other hand taken "Linda Lovelace: Anti-Porn Advocate" about as seriously as I did when Traci Lords tried something very similar and got pretty much laughed off when she tried unsuccessfully to get Ginger Lynn Allen to testify with her (or so I heard).
Simply put there are plenty of sexy young girls out there who don't mind doing this kind of thing for easy money. For the most part the big porn houses in the US don't need to go around and kidnap girls and force them into sexual servitude.
I've read a bit about it, and it just seems ridiculous, I'm pretty sure I've heard the same basic kind of story being sold here before.
Now there ARE criticisms I can make of the porn industry (which I won't go into), but this isn't one of them, and as I said, I'm surprised this got approved.
What's more, why would either of these girls, Lindsey or Malin, be interested in doing this movie? Okay Lindsey Lohan is a wild girl, I get that, but she does seem to have talent and this doesn't seem like a good vehicle for her. Malin Akerman isn't as well known but strikes me as being able to find work other than what seems to be a "Made for TV Movie" being given the theatrical treatment.
Such are my thoughts.