Oh, for god's sake.loa said:What are you on about?JimB said:Please be explicit, loa, because these vague portents of doom are meaningless. What exactly do you think will happen? It sounds to me as if you believe Nintendo means to create a game in which Link and all its inhabitants behave at their normal, more or less believable power levels, yet Linkle alone will be running through it like Dante in Devil May Cry. Is that your fear, or is it something else?loa said:I'm arguing that Zelda is better than that. Or used to be.
loa, I am asking you to please describe exactly what complaints you have with the announcement that Nintendo is considering adding Linkle to a Zelda game. I do not understand the nature of your grievance because your language is extremely vague, bordering on the nonsensical (for example, saying "Zelda used to be better than that" without explaining what level the game has sunk to or why that level is a bad one), and because of logical inconsistencies like the way you deride Linkle for her capabilities in a spin-off game without applying that same complaint to every other character in the series ("Oh man, Link totally doesn't fit in Hyrule with all his wearing costumes and holding two full-grown versions of himself over his head, that shit is so cartoony"). The only conclusion I can conjure to this is that you are nearly panicked at the thought of Linkle appearing in a game, so I asked you to explain in precise terms what harm was being inflicted and by whom.
Has this at all clarified my question?
Whatever Nintendo decides to add.loa said:If you take the "fast fire" away from the crossbow, then...what are we left with, exactly?
I did not say one word comparing Linkle to Midna. Please do not strawman me, loa.loa said:There is literally nothing else even remotely interesting to this character and if you think she's on the same level as, say, Midna, then I don't know what to say to you.