Doctors busy filming right now, so i'll send the Master to handle it.Daystar Clarion said:I don't think there's enough fire in the world to kill this when it gets out...
Gonna have to send a Time Lord to sort this out I think.
Doctors busy filming right now, so i'll send the Master to handle it.Daystar Clarion said:I don't think there's enough fire in the world to kill this when it gets out...
Gonna have to send a Time Lord to sort this out I think.
Well, to be fair, I don't think cyberpunk as it was originally created has really been captured quite yet. There are many movies, some all time greats, that touch upon certain aspects of cyberpunk but I don't know that I've ever seen a movie I would call cyberpunk from start to finish. Personally I think there's a great deal of cyberpunk that has yet to be explored in forms other than just literature, and some of it would make for a great movie.Sabazios said:Why is everybody trying to revive cyberpunk all of a sudden?
My guess is that people are realizing we only have a few years to enjoy it as fiction.Sabazios said:Why is everybody trying to revive cyberpunk all of a sudden?
Bladerunner... tell me that wasnt cyperpunk through and throughStriderShinryu said:Well, to be fair, I don't think cyberpunk as it was originally created has really been captured quite yet. There are many movies, some all time greats, that touch upon certain aspects of cyberpunk but I don't know that I've ever seen a movie I would call cyberpunk from start to finish. Personally I think there's a great deal of cyberpunk that has yet to be explored in forms other than just literature, and some of it would make for a great movie.Sabazios said:Why is everybody trying to revive cyberpunk all of a sudden?
Bladerunner, while a great film and one of my favourites of all time, was more sci-fi than cyberpunk. It also dealt more thematically with the concept of artificial intelligence as intelligence than most cyberpunk does. Cyberpunk is more based in the themes of future day class systems and street VS corporate. It's also more heavily rooted in a digitally enhanced contemporary day (or contemporary as seen in the 80s/90s anyway) rather than a future world as seen in Bladerunner.SovietPanda said:Bladerunner... tell me that wasnt cyperpunk through and throughStriderShinryu said:Well, to be fair, I don't think cyberpunk as it was originally created has really been captured quite yet. There are many movies, some all time greats, that touch upon certain aspects of cyberpunk but I don't know that I've ever seen a movie I would call cyberpunk from start to finish. Personally I think there's a great deal of cyberpunk that has yet to be explored in forms other than just literature, and some of it would make for a great movie.Sabazios said:Why is everybody trying to revive cyberpunk all of a sudden?
OT: I would have watched this with keanu reeves, on release date, just to watch all the fanboys cry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberpunkStriderShinryu said:Bladerunner, while a great film and one of my favourites of all time, was more sci-fi than cyberpunk. It also dealt more thematically with the concept of artificial intelligence as intelligence than most cyberpunk does. Cyberpunk is more based in the themes of future day class systems and street VS corporate. It's also more heavily rooted in a digitally enhanced contemporary day (or contemporary as seen in the 80s/90s anyway) rather than a future world as seen in Bladerunner.SovietPanda said:Bladerunner... tell me that wasnt cyperpunk through and throughStriderShinryu said:Well, to be fair, I don't think cyberpunk as it was originally created has really been captured quite yet. There are many movies, some all time greats, that touch upon certain aspects of cyberpunk but I don't know that I've ever seen a movie I would call cyberpunk from start to finish. Personally I think there's a great deal of cyberpunk that has yet to be explored in forms other than just literature, and some of it would make for a great movie.Sabazios said:Why is everybody trying to revive cyberpunk all of a sudden?
OT: I would have watched this with keanu reeves, on release date, just to watch all the fanboys cry
While the Wikipedia entry does list Bladerunner as a notable entry in cyberpunk as seen in film, it also lists authors who created the genre before the film existed. Most (all?) of those authors don't really write anything that resembles what you see in Bladerunner. I suppose it depends on what you consider cyberpunk then. If you go by the definition information given in the entry I'd say it's still somewhat doubtful that Bladerunner is worthy of consideration even if it is mentioned by name. If you go by the original definition that existed upon the genre's creation, it's not. *shrug*SovietPanda said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberpunkStriderShinryu said:Bladerunner, while a great film and one of my favourites of all time, was more sci-fi than cyberpunk. It also dealt more thematically with the concept of artificial intelligence as intelligence than most cyberpunk does. Cyberpunk is more based in the themes of future day class systems and street VS corporate. It's also more heavily rooted in a digitally enhanced contemporary day (or contemporary as seen in the 80s/90s anyway) rather than a future world as seen in Bladerunner.SovietPanda said:Bladerunner... tell me that wasnt cyperpunk through and throughStriderShinryu said:Well, to be fair, I don't think cyberpunk as it was originally created has really been captured quite yet. There are many movies, some all time greats, that touch upon certain aspects of cyberpunk but I don't know that I've ever seen a movie I would call cyberpunk from start to finish. Personally I think there's a great deal of cyberpunk that has yet to be explored in forms other than just literature, and some of it would make for a great movie.Sabazios said:Why is everybody trying to revive cyberpunk all of a sudden?
OT: I would have watched this with keanu reeves, on release date, just to watch all the fanboys cry
read, consider blade runner again... then tell me im wrong xD
Like every other live-action anime film ever made in America? *cries*vansau said:The original plan for Akira was reportedly to make a two-movie epic, now it sounds like Warner Bros. want another soulless action piece that will bear nothing in common with its source material other than a couple of characters with the same names. Oh, and it will probably be widely-reviled by fans of the anime, but will make a slew of cash thanks to a brilliant marketing campaign.
Well, I saw Blood in a slightly different light. As with Akira, the original Blood OVA was one of the first bits of anime that I saw, and it played a key role in making me the "hardcore" anime snob that I am today.cursedseishi said:Snip.