I was not going to reply to the posts about Lovecraft's racism since it seems to be par for the course but it was bugging me so here goes.
It is easy to demonize Lovecraft's views on race today. However, it is also fundamentally intellectually dishonest. Sure, presentism is fun but what purpose does it serve? If I wanted I could write an essay on just about any great author decrying his racism. Did not Shakespeare himself write a play centered around an angry black man? Better stop reading him then!
Racist interpretations of Lovecraft's stories are easy. That does not mean they are correct. Nor does it mean they reflect the author's intention. Yes, Lovecraft started out racist, his 'On the Creation of Niggers' confirms as much. However, to call it the worst thing you've read is hilarous. 'OtCoN' pretty much reflects the views of its time. People still clinged to the idea of the Great Chain of Being. The idea can be traced in biological writing, church doctrine and public opinion even long after Lovecraft's death.
I could go on and discuss the various fallacies and inconsistencies involved in Lovecraft's condemnation, but that seems somewhat futile. As I said, it's all par for the course...
What truely annoys me, however, is people claiming the moral high ground and then making fun of Lovecraft. I saw a tweet on your feed Zitterberg:
..., I hugely respect you and admire you, but please refrain from using such ableist terms ...
It's okay, just know that this is very hurtful for some. It would be a shame if people stopped listening because of ableist slurs.
Let's say Lovecraft's sex life was anybody's business... and let's say he was one of the people that is asexual (, according to Kinsey approx 1.5% of the population). How exactly is it ok to ridicule him for this?
So I would like to express a similar sentiment as you did in those tweets.
That being said, I'm looking forward to reading that article when it's done.