Personally, I'm of the opinion that if you don't want to get publicly called out for cheating on your significant other, don't publicly cheat on your significant other.
In his defence, however, he only drew attention to it. It's not like he openly stated "bro trust me she's banging this dude", he merely told him what the text said.Lilani said:I think it would have been best for him to not say anything. He doesn't know the greater context. She could have been philandering, or it could have been a sick friend or family member, or maybe a friend or family member who's on vacation somewhere. Perhaps he saw enough to be reasonably suspicious, but it's still not worth potentially causing a rift in some stranger's relationship over something which may or may not actually be a problem. I can see how her telling a male friend she'd rather be with them could be cheating, but I also see how it could be her just not wanting to be at the game and telling a friend she'd rather be someplace they are.
It was really just none of his damn business.
Gonna have to disagree with you there. If all someone has is an unfounded, out-of-context suspicion that something like that is going on then getting involved will nearly always end badly. Being told that your partner is cheating on you is devastating news, and giving someone that news based only on a hunch is an incredibly cavalier way of behaving. Yeah, sometimes getting involved will hit the nail on the head and save someone some heartache, but most of the time the Good Samaritan will be wrong and sow seeds of mistrust into what had been a perfectly healthy relationship for no other reason than their own sense of pious highhandedness.Marsell said:somehow i doubt that would be the case if the genders of the people involved where reversed.Grouchy Imp said:If this lass hadn't been texting another fella this guy would be rightly slated for intruding on this woman's privacy and reading her private messages without her knowledge or consent, but now because she was caught doing something wrong then he's a 'good Samaritan' and his actions are defensible? Yeah, not buying it. Regardless of whether those texts were suspicious or innocent, he shouldn't have been reading them in the first place.
and before you flip, NO i dont know the whole story, maybe it IS just a big misunderstanding. and YES, he did have no business reading her phone.
BUT STILL, if you know someone is potentially cheating on someone else and you do nothing about it... your just as bad.
plus if she is cheating, she has some BALLS texting her side guy next to her boyfriend. in a crowded stadium no less.
just super sayin'... 4
This right there. Don't want to be exposed as a whore, don't act like a whore.The Lunatic said:Personally, I'm of the opinion that if you don't want to get publicly called out for cheating on your significant other, don't publicly cheat on your significant other.
While I agree with the opinion, could we call her a cheater or emotional manipulator, or just unfaithful hag, *****? I know whore is usually associated with sleeping with a a lot of people, and while that is usually an occupational "hazard" of being a prostitute, I still think it's a mislabel, since she isn't exactly getting payed for sex, and the main issue really is that she allegedly slept with more than just one more than allowed.Kathinka said:This right there. Don't want to be exposed as a whore, don't act like a whore.The Lunatic said:Personally, I'm of the opinion that if you don't want to get publicly called out for cheating on your significant other, don't publicly cheat on your significant other.
If I were, in whatever way, to see something like this, I'd let the boyfriend know. For one simple reason: If I was in his position, I sure as hell would want to know too.
it's been a while so I've kinda lost any oomph I had for this story originally, and while I have no problem with someone calling it out, it doesn't mean it doesn't happen, hell I see it happening in the grocery store when you're waiting in line, and that's even less traffic than public transportation.TheKasp said:I live in a city with public transporation (I use it on a daily basis). If you look at the screen of other peoples phones and read them you are a fucking creep. People don't like that and call you out on this. Some less pleasant than others.gmaverick019 said:If I lived in a city that actually used public transportation, and it was high volume trafficking, I wouldn't give a shit if the person next to me was watching what I was saying or not, if I found it urgent enough to text at that moment then I don't really care what people around me think
Yes, you might not care. But frankly, if you care doesn't matter. Other people do. It is basic manners to not read the private messages of other people. You don't do this with books or letters someone might read in the bus or train, why is it a-okay with phones?
It is not even hard to not read the texts. It actually takes concentration and effort to read them, it doesn't take either to not do that.