bahumat42 said:
Treblaine said:
Scott Bullock said:
Crippen's lawyer then tried to compare the moddification to jailbreaking an iPhone, an action explicitly allowed by the DMCA, but the Judge again disallowed the defense, stating that the iPhone case does not pertain to game consoles.
Yes, it's not like iPhone can play games or anything.
Oh wait, phones are almost universally socially accepted, so they get a free pass. But video games consoles, dear god... people still blame Columbine on video games.
do you know what the iphone mods were generally for?
1. Send and receive MMS
2. Record video
3. Improve the digital camera
4. better text messaging
5. Customise the interface
6. Change the network APN
7. Copy and paste
8. Use as a tethered modem
9. Proper formatting for phone numbers
10. Organise applications into folder
source
http://apcmag.com/hack_your_iphone.htm
the main reason that the Iphone hack was basically given a free pass was BECAUSE IT DID WHAT THE PHONE SHOULD OF BEEN ABLE TO ANYWAY.
I don't know what you're getting at (other than items 2, 7 and 10 are already in the official iOS) but the idea that jailbroken phones still buy all their apps doesn't add up. I didn't even know you could use the app-store with a jailbroken iphone, you can't buy the apps any other way so piracy is the only option. It is certainly a possibility.
Not to mention the piracy that has been inherent with MP3 players since day one. Have you any idea how much 30GB worth of music costs if you legally bought every track or CD? About $6'500, who SPENDS that much on music? So many people clamoured for such large capacity MP3 players BECAUSE OF THE RAMPANT PIRACY!
I'm worried by this law as it treats the idea of merely being ABLE to pirate games as a crime.
I have a PC, that means I'm able to pirate game, I'm just a web-link away from a .exe of a cracked game file. Does that make ME a criminal? Am I exempt simply because my PC has ALWAYS been able to pirate content (even though I have NEVER pirated any game in my life, not one)?
It's the legal presumption of corporate control that I object to, and I think that goes beyond justice to the very law itself.
There are so many reasons other that violating copyrights for hacking an xbox, also as simple as cheating. Yes, it's an amoral thing to do but it's not illegal, maybe breach of contract when you joined Xbox live, but illegal for merely allowing them to do that?
Face it, the crime here is not facilitating copyright violations, EVERYONE is guilty of that. Itunes is guilty of that allowing you to import songs with no verification of where they have come from.
This guy is guilty of undermining a company's control of their customers. If that is a crime, it shouldn't be.