misterprickly said:
MelasZepheos said:
The Imp said:
Mantonio said:
The Imp said:
I'd prefer them dropping Captain America altogether. If it's one thing the world doesn't need it's a stupid patriotic action hero spreading the oh-so holy american way of life.
You're an idiot who doesn't know anything about the character.
Because i don't give two shits about a character named Captain America wearing a stars and stripes costume fighting evil on all fronts to save the day and be a hero. I despise super heroes, i hate their costumes and masks, their virtues and do-goody attitude. I love to read comics but i read The Boys, The Punisher MAX, 100 Bullets, Crossed, Neonomicon and Hellblazer not some Justice League or Avengers crap with guys in spandex fighting their arch nemesis for the bazillionth time but don't kill him when he is at their mercy just so he can escape custody and appear in the next book.
Then why did you comment?
If you want to get involved in a discussion, it's courteous to at least learn the bare minimums about the thing you're discussing before you start, so you can argue from a position which isn't entirely ignorant.
I understand that "The Imp" doesn't care about some "Yankee Doodle"; That's HIS opinion and he's entitled to it.
However I also agree that he should do SOME research into the subject that he's commenting on.
For an easy source just watch MovieBoB's "Avengers Assemble"
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escape-to-the-movies/1604-Avengers-Assemble
***Remember***
It's OK to not like something... Just make sure it's for the right reasons.
It's okay to not like something as long as you aren't ignorant, arrogant, and downright rude about it... that's actually in the forum guidelines, btw.
Seriously, if you have nothing but the vaguest impression of a subject (as Imp does, by admitting he has never even read one CA comic), you should probably not comment; however, if you just
have to involve yourself in the discussion, it's generally thought that a person should at least do a little research, because otherwise you're just wasting everyone's time making uninformed statements. (He could've taken 10 minutes to read the wiki [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_America] at least.)
I was going to jump into the fray, but plenty of people have already mentioned these things. Besides, it strikes me as Imp probably will just go on being angry, stereotyping, and insulting about it, since he clearly thinks that his opinion does not require any sort of substantiation. Those 'holier-than-thou' types tend to bring out the anger in my responses, particularly when they are have such a high opinion of themselves as to think that no one else's viewpoint- or even the facts, really- matter.
It's actually kind of funny. Imp is doing a good job behaving in the ways he'd like to criticize Americans for behaving (at least that's what I got out of the 'oh-so-holy American culture' comment), if you think about it; sadly, I don't think think it's an intentional irony.
---
OT: Remember: Hollywood studio marketing departments aren't filled with complete boneheads, people. Honestly, if they didn't think they'd gain an overall positive push by appealing to the comic-book aficionados in the countries where they aren't changing the name, I think they probably would've dropped the 'Captain America' part of the title completely. Just too dangerous to risk accusations of jingoism in this day and age.
I think the whole "frozen in ice since 1945" is going to explain the costume, and it should allow for a mental throwback for most audience members to when the USA wasn't the 'Great Satan' that many people (and not just radical Islamic sects) tend to try to make it out to be these days.