Mass Effect 3: Extended Cut is not victory.

DeadYorick

New member
Jan 13, 2011
92
0
0
SajuukKhar said:
Kahunaburger said:
To misquote Shigeru Miyamoto, a buggy game is eventually patched. A bad game is bad forever.
If only New Vegas was patched to fix its bugs, or Alpha Protocol, or NWN2, or KOTOR 2.

But unfortunately they are still buggy messes that require fan patches to work even most of the time.
I`ve never run a fanmade patch for New Vegas, compared to how I had to run a custom made directx file that I downloaded off the internet to run at release, to now where it runs without any framedrop, I don`t see any problems.

As well a big issue with New Vegas was that things like post release content and patches were funded by the publisher, but they didnt get any extra funding like royalties from Bethesda because of their big metacritic scandal. Hence why it took so long and why they were pressed to release it as soon as possible.

As well Kotor 2 I didnt have any bugs with. I only just installed the fanmade mod that restored all the cut content that resulted from Lucasarts pushing the Christmas release date.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
DrVornoff said:
Looking at all of this, I have to ask. Can anybody tell me what... precisely... would "victory conditions" entail? And how do you know when you've lost?
Ill bite

point 1. the ending is bad, that pretty much everyone agrees on, not only bad for being ambiguous and bleak. But bad for having insane amounts of plotholes.Going by what we see in the ending...everything, everyone is pretty much fucked, and we dont know anything about what we care about

point 2. with that in mind Bioware said they arnt "changing" the ending, just adding a few bits and peices through the extended cut

point3. BECAUSE the ending is as it is..and BECAUSE Bioware have made it clear they arnt changing it, then it makes us question how they can salavage such a mess with a few cutscenes....although and we'll have to wait and see, the point is it doesnt seem like a victory, because a few cutscenes probably arnt going to improve anything
 

The Human Torch

New member
Sep 12, 2010
750
0
0
Metalix Knightmare said:
The Human Torch said:
imahobbit4062 said:
Oh look, more whining about Mass Effect 3's ending.
Can't you guys just get the fuck over it already? You didn't like the ending to a game, that's unfortunate. Now move on with your lives. If trying to get the ending of a game change seriously means that much to you. You need to get your priorities straight and ***** about something that matters.
Like bitching about people bitching about Mass Effect 3. If you don't like a thread/topic, stay the hell out of it and go donate money for some starving childeren.
Well we would, except these people KEEP MAKING THE BLOODY THINGS! Seriously, how many main topics on this subject do we frigging NEED!? If this was the Something Awful forums there would be a subpage just for this topic by now!
Appearantly when Bioware releases news that they are working on expanding the current ending(s), it's not allowed to make new threads about this.
Again, if this topic (or any other kind of topic) does not work for you, then don't click on the thread link. Don't reply to it and just look for other threads of your interest.
You do not need to be here, there is no code of honor that compels you to reply to everything on the Escapist forum.

Complaining about other people complaining is useless, especially when you can just so easily ignore the topic.
 

Alpha Maeko

Uh oh, better get Maeko!
Apr 14, 2010
573
0
0
Indoctrination was the only theory that made the problematic ending palatable.

Artistic vision my ass, they've written enough amazing stories to know better then to claim that ending made any sense or lasting positive impact. It's not forcing us to consider the plight of the human condition, or starving children in Africa, or the state of our economy. The closest thing it comes to is provoking questions about the meaning of our existence, but then that doesn't work either, because it's apparently all just space magic.

Please tell me how this "artistic vision" qualifies as anything other then a cover up for their failure to come up with anything better. I'd love to hear it.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Just Plain Lazy said:
Will ya'll play a different game already. o.o
Go play Rayman Origin's or something, go play a game for the sake of enjoyment and have fun for once with your games, or game, or whatever. <.<
because I didnt have any fun with Mass effect 3 at all....it was a grueling terrible experience but I peservered because THATS WHAT ART IS

"enjoyment" is the enitre reason this thing exists, we did not enjoy the ending, and we didnt feel happy afterward
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
DrVornoff said:
I'm going to guess that was a very roundabout way of saying, "no?"

I'm not asking this to be sarcastic or mean. It's just that if people are going to use words like "victory" it would help to have a point of reference for when this goal is achieved or failed.
best case scenario(victory): Bioware scrap the current ending and give us somthing different

best case scenario [b/] realisticly:[/b] they provide some much needed closure (subjective yes)9(semi-vistory)

worst case scenario: the new ending doesnt change anything

as I said, its too early to see...
 

thememan

New member
Mar 30, 2012
104
0
0
Alpha Maeko said:
Indoctrination was the only theory that made the problematic ending palatable.

Artistic vision my ass, they've written enough amazing stories to know better then to claim that ending made any sense or lasting positive impact. It's not forcing us to consider the plight of the human condition, or starving children in Africa, or the state of our economy. The closest thing it comes to is provoking questions about the meaning of our existence, but then that doesn't work either, because it's apparently all just space magic.

Please tell me how this "artistic vision" qualifies as anything other then a cover up for their failure to come up with anything better. I'd love to hear it.
You see, it's an "artistic vision" as long as they call it such. You don't actually have to defend your artistic vision substantially, or provide any sort of description or clarification for it yourself, because calling it your artistic vision is enough.

Of course this is a load of crap, and is one of the many reasons why Bioware is failing at the artistic vision angle. Without providing proper clarification when questions are initially brought up makes it clear that they are unable or unwilling to substantially defend their product. A months after the fact DLC does not even rectify this, as it is not them actually clarifying anything-it is adding more paint to the canvas and telling the audience to figure it out.

Which really makes me question what kind of vision they actually had in the first place.
 

jklinders

New member
Sep 21, 2010
945
0
0
It really isn't enough. Would anything have been though? Really?

Endings are usually crap in games as they are generally an afterthought patched together with leftover resources and time. Yes they should have budgeted better. But that is the nature of the beast.

Before we completely dismiss this as a "loss," let us consider a couple of things. First, someone (Casey Hudson?), however poorly done had an idea of how to finish the game, then he allocated too few resources to communicate it to the consumer. After a concentrated effort, that consumer base forced his parent company to dedicate resources that all of them would rather be put on some paid DLC package to fix it. The 4 month time period suggests that people and money was pulled from other stuff to make this happen. For free.

Whether the end result is worth it or not, only CDPRed has done this (far better) to my knowledge.
 

The Human Torch

New member
Sep 12, 2010
750
0
0
imahobbit4062 said:
I never stated that you, specifically are pathetic. But this entire ME3 ending outrage is pathetic. I can count a dozen other games that had endings that I didn't like, nor that made sense (Jak 3 for example, yet it is still one of my favourite games ever). That gamers feel so entitled that a company should alter or completely change an ending because they personally didn't like it? That we have people demanding refunds and wanting to sue the company because of an ending that is still a significantly small portion of the game that was overall great?
As I said, if gaming really means that much to them that they are still going on about this ending and demanding it being change a month after release. They need to get their priorities in order. I love gaming, I have most of my life (even though I have toned down the amount of time I game significantly over the past few months). To let something so small as an ending get people that upset over, it's pathetic. Just move on already.
You did specifically say that Bioware fans are pathetic. I don't really consider myself a fan as Mass Effect is the only product of Bioware that I enjoy, but I am passionate about Mass Effect 3's ending. I guess that makes me a fan.
However, I do not wish to argue with you, I apologize for calling you a prick, I was having a bad day and it's never a good idea to post in a bad mood.

That being said, consumers have a right to complain when a product is lackluster, and complaining does get things done.

The whole FoV (Field of View) debacle with The Darkness 2 and Gotham City Imposters got plenty of complaints from PC-gamers who plainly couldn't play the game because of this, and the developers listened and got it fixed.

There is no reason to accept a bad product, especially in the case of Mass Effect 3, where 95% of the game is actually good, and in the end plummits drastically in quality.

It is not pathetic when you complain about something that you are passionate about (especially when the complaint is reasonable), just because you don't care, doesn't mean that others should follow suit.
You have your passions, and I have mine. Please respect that.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
DrVornoff said:
Vault101 said:
best case scenario(victory): Bioware scrap the current ending and give us somthing different

best case scenario [b/] realisticly:[/b] they provide some much needed closure (subjective yes)9(semi-vistory)

worst case scenario: the new ending doesnt change anything

as I said, its too early to see...
Still not terribly specific. Though I get the distinct feeling that some people will continue demanding the first option until a couple of years from now when they realize no one's paying attention to them anymore.
that is true..some peopel wont be satified

but GENERALLY speaking almost ANYTHING will be better than the current ending

also alot of people feel that it wont be enough (and Im inclined to agree)
 

thememan

New member
Mar 30, 2012
104
0
0
Ihniwid said:
Shadowkire said:
Ihniwid said:
This whole thing says more about the fans of the series than the company that made it. We saw this occur earlier in the year when the Mass Effect book was released and there was a petition to change various lore issues that were discovered.

Contributing to fandom does not inherently provide the consumer with creative rights to a given product. This is especially true of "art forms" which, I think, most Mass Effect fans would argue the video game is aspiring towards. Consumerism simply provides the ability to consume the product.

If you don't like the product, the only recourse you have is to ask for a refund.

This basic fact is altogether missing in the hive-mind that encapsulates the Mass Effect fan base.
Or maybe the fans hadn't given up on BioWare just yet and were saying "We don't like what you gave us for the amount we spent on it, we would appreciate it if changes were made to make things better."

One thing you anti-fan whiners always miss is that if most of the fans get refund/stop buying BioWare games BW will go out of business. Then not only will we have a bad game and maybe missed out on a few good games but we would lose one of the few RPG developers in the market. The fans were trying to create a situation where everyone wins, instead of your crap solution of everyone losing.
Well, I think my first question is what you meant by "anti-fan whiners." Do you mean an anti-fan who also whines, or an individual who is against fans who happen to whine?

But I digress... The way consumerism (and the overarching framework of capitalism) works is pretty simple. If the fans stopped purchasing products from Bioware on the basis that the company did not take the story line or plot elements seriously enough, then yes, Bioware "could potentially" go out of business. From what I understand, however, the game sold very well, even by modest estimates of gross sales to date. So... there's that.

Your, umm, conclusion that the fans are trying to save Bioware from some sort of possible corruption or bankruptcy does not make any sense. The fans simply want something they did not get. It's a purely selfish request and has nothing to do with saving Bioware from financial or public ruin.
Interestingly enough, the modern consumer market is changing in a rather intriguing way. Modern social media has become a necessary asset to many consumer products, with feedback coming from across the world and in real-time. The old business model of "if you don't like it, don't buy it" is becoming a less practical, and quite detrimental. Thing is, in the modern day there is absolutely no good reason why a company won't try to appease the customers of it's product-so long as it is "profitable" or at the least cost them less than they would lose. Consumer feedback can be an important tool for a savvy business, as it allows you to adapt your products quickly to what the consumers desire, and change what needs to be changed.

With digital products, it's even easier. The dissemination of your product can happen well within the homes of the consumers themselves. You don't need to convince them to go an actually buy it physically, as they can do that from the comfort of their own ottoman.

Now, what does this mean? Frankly, it's mostly prediction on my end, but a logical prediction. Those companies whose consumers rather loudly proclaim their dislike of the product have a very unique opportunity: Make it better, or more to the point a better fit for their customers. Really, social media criticism should be seen as something of a boon for an intelligent business working primarily in digital media. They have the rather unique position of knowing full-well that people are not happy with their products without having to wait for any real foot work to be done in the physical world.

Further, they can very quickly address these issues in a far faster manner than other products can. They can gather the information more quickly, fix the problems more readily, and provide a "fix" more easily than physical world counterparts ever can. I foresee those business willing to utilize social media fully and effectively to create stronger products, or to fix problems that the consumer have, will be far more successful and both garnering and maintaining consumer goodwill than those that do not.

In short, we've moved well beyond the "if you don't like, don't buy" stage of capitalism, which is really just lazy capitalism at best. Giving feedback, positive or negative, really will do nothing but help those willing approach this issues intelligently and constructively.

And yet, this is different. I have a strong feeling that the product being released will not appease the fanbase. And one doesn't really need to go far to understand why. The major issue that has stoked the flames so hot for so long has very little to do with the product or the plans to fix the product itself. That's rather unimportant in the grand scheme of everything. Really, the major issue comes from the rather huge PR debacle involving it all. By being both insulting and condescending towards their detractors, they have effectively disillusioned a large portion of the people. They have treated the situation rather flipantly, and have heavily implied that the opinions of these people simply do not matter. The industry's media has made this situation even worse for Bioware. What this has created is a group of consumers who have essentially been told (either intentionally or not is of no importance) that their criticism and desires simply do not matter.

This is bad. Very bad. Excessively bad. The reasoning is really quite simple. It has honestly gotten to the point where many will not be satisfied with anything that is provided. Those that feel dissillusioned by this entire situation will likely view any material released with a grain of salt, simply out of anger or dissatisfaction with Bioware. They will view any attempt at "fixing" the situation as a cop-out or a lazily produced product with the obvious purpose of placating the masses, rather than Bioware actually listening and concerning themselves with their arguments. It doesn't really matter at this point what is produced, as the common narrative that has been trumpeted both by Bioware and by the industry at large is "You don't matter". Whether or not this is true matters absolutely none. Perception is all that is important, and they have made many statements which heavily imply this. And whether the implication is true or not simply doesn't matter either, as that is what the consumers have heard.

To put it simply, Bioware through some rather poor PR stunts has painted themselves into a rather bleak corner. The absolute best they can hope for at this point is that the DLC "extended cut" will go mostly unnoticed as the initial fervor will have died down by then.

But this also creates some problems for Bioware as a whole as well. Their only product in development (At least known) is Dragon Age 3, a franchise game with only modest interest at best in the name itself, let alone the rather unimpressive sales of the second game compounding on this. Further, their big labor of recent being The Old Republic, which isn't exactly going so hot these days either. ME3, although not a critical failure, was not a massive success either. It sold moderately well to very well, but did not meet the expecations of the predictions set forth. Couple this with the rather large disillusioned group surrounding ME3, and things are not looking to good for Bioware. Is it dismal or near bankruptcy? Well, no. Not really at all. But it isn't looking good when everything is lumped together.

TL;DR version:

Nothing Bioware does will matter, as they pissed on those critical of ME3 through very bad PR moves. Also, not buying a product isn't a very smart or good thing to do in this day and age.
 

ralfy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 21, 2008
420
55
33
Ihniwid said:
Your use of a "broken game" here is interesting. Because, it is true, a game can be broken. There can be debilitating bugs, crashes or significant framerate loss. But, how can a game be broken on a story level? You make a leap in your argument to simply prove that your dislike of the game ending is inherently a gameplay issue. From where I am standing, it is not a gameplay issue, it is a creative issue. A story issue.
It's a space opera adventure game with RPG elements. That means it has to have C&Cs leading to a particular ending. That hardly happened for this game.

My argument, then, has nothing to do with my dislike of the ending. The problem also doesn't involve lack of creativity.
 

JediMB

New member
Oct 25, 2008
3,094
0
0
Metalix Knightmare said:
JediMB said:
Mass Effect 3 doesn't need an Extended Cut.

It needs a Renegade Version [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highlander_II:_The_Quickening#Home_video_releases].
Okay, let's not say things we can't take back. ME3 had a cruddy ending. Highlander II completely sodomized a series within the first 30 minutes. ANY comparison between the two is unnecessary.
DeadYorick said:
He means it needs to be recut, he`s not comparing it to Highlander 2. Highlander 2 had a fanmade recut that made the plot make sense and removed all the continuity errors. He`s just saying make a recut of ME3 thats more renegade.
Indeed. Like Highlander II was recut to remove all references to aliens, ME3 needs to be recut to remove all references to the Star Child (and that entire final area).

Most of the other problems can be fixed if the game simply attempts to explain the inconsistencies... although it would also benefit from a few entirely new cutscenes to make the Citadel-napping less illogical and the state of your fleet more accurately represented.

And, of course, the game needs that proper epilogue.

EDIT: Also, "Renegade Version" just makes so much sense as a subtitle for a Mass Effect recut. That or "Paragon Version", of course.
 

Metalix Knightmare

New member
Sep 27, 2007
831
0
0
JediMB said:
Metalix Knightmare said:
JediMB said:
Mass Effect 3 doesn't need an Extended Cut.

It needs a Renegade Version [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highlander_II:_The_Quickening#Home_video_releases].
Okay, let's not say things we can't take back. ME3 had a cruddy ending. Highlander II completely sodomized a series within the first 30 minutes. ANY comparison between the two is unnecessary.
DeadYorick said:
He means it needs to be recut, he`s not comparing it to Highlander 2. Highlander 2 had a fanmade recut that made the plot make sense and removed all the continuity errors. He`s just saying make a recut of ME3 thats more renegade.
Indeed. Like Highlander II was recut to remove all references to aliens, ME3 needs to be recut to remove all references to the Star Child (and that entire final area).

Most of the other problems can be fixed if the game simply attempts to explain the inconsistencies... although it would also benefit from a few entirely new cutscenes to make the Citadel-napping less illogical and the state of your fleet more accurately represented.

And, of course, the game needs that proper epilogue.

EDIT: Also, "Renegade Version" just makes so much sense as a subtitle for a Mass Effect recut. That or "Paragon Version", of course.
Okay, that epilogue you just mentioned? First FEASIBLE request I've really seen and it's one I can really get behind. I'm not really sure why Bioware stopped making them after Jade Empire, but it would make for a good bit of closure.