Mass Effect 3 Gets An Ending

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,321
0
0
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
summarizing the majority of the comments: wahhh, fuck you yahtzee. you dont know anything about video games, im right and youre wrong because....well, because i said so!
As opposed to Yahtzee's "you're all a bunch of cockheads who don't know shit"?
based on what ive seen, im inclined to agree with yahtzee on that one
 

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,321
0
0
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
summarizing the majority of the comments: wahhh, fuck you yahtzee. you dont know anything about video games, im right and youre wrong because....well, because i said so!
As opposed to Yahtzee's "you're all a bunch of cockheads who don't know shit"?
based on what ive seen, im inclined to agree with yahtzee on that one
And I'm inclined to believe that if you believe that the fate of the "video games as art" debate hinges on whether or not Bioware changes the ending, you're a retarded monkey who shouldn't be allowed near an electrical devise for fear you'll kill yourself, let alone allowed to use a computer. Aren't baseless insults towards an entire group fun and amusing?
uh oh, well then you better let my boss know right away, and you should also probably contact the people who trained me to be a technical director. that involves a computer AND various electrical devices. plus, theres probably laws against using monkeys as part of your workforce.

i dont really get what youre trying to say. that im an asshole because i side more with people like yahtzee and bob than i do with mass effect fanboys?
 

satsugaikaze

New member
Feb 26, 2011
114
0
0
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
summarizing the majority of the comments: wahhh, fuck you yahtzee. you dont know anything about video games, im right and youre wrong because....well, because i said so!
As opposed to Yahtzee's "you're all a bunch of cockheads who don't know shit"?
At least Yahtzee has a reason to do it: he gets paid for his false flippancy. Sure, self-righteous is self-righteous, but he makes a living out of it, and power to him.

The average consumer, however, hurls abuse simply because it's his/her feelings. =P
 

wintercoat

New member
Nov 26, 2011
1,691
0
0
00slash00 said:
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
summarizing the majority of the comments: wahhh, fuck you yahtzee. you dont know anything about video games, im right and youre wrong because....well, because i said so!
As opposed to Yahtzee's "you're all a bunch of cockheads who don't know shit"?
based on what ive seen, im inclined to agree with yahtzee on that one
And I'm inclined to believe that if you believe that the fate of the "video games as art" debate hinges on whether or not Bioware changes the ending, you're a retarded monkey who shouldn't be allowed near an electrical devise for fear you'll kill yourself, let alone allowed to use a computer. Aren't baseless insults towards an entire group fun and amusing?
uh oh, well then you better let my boss know right away, and you should also probably contact the people who trained me to be a technical director. that involves a computer AND various electrical devices. plus, theres probably laws against using monkeys as part of your workforce.

i dont really get what youre trying to say. that im an asshole because i side more with people like yahtzee and bob than i do with mass effect fanboys?
Sigh...no, I'm saying that throwing around baseless moronic insults to define an entire group makes you a cockhead more deserving of the term than the people you label with it.

And yes, if you truly believe that the fate of an entire industry revolves around a single event, you're an idiot.
 

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,321
0
0
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
wintercoat said:
00slash00 said:
summarizing the majority of the comments: wahhh, fuck you yahtzee. you dont know anything about video games, im right and youre wrong because....well, because i said so!
As opposed to Yahtzee's "you're all a bunch of cockheads who don't know shit"?
based on what ive seen, im inclined to agree with yahtzee on that one
And I'm inclined to believe that if you believe that the fate of the "video games as art" debate hinges on whether or not Bioware changes the ending, you're a retarded monkey who shouldn't be allowed near an electrical devise for fear you'll kill yourself, let alone allowed to use a computer. Aren't baseless insults towards an entire group fun and amusing?
uh oh, well then you better let my boss know right away, and you should also probably contact the people who trained me to be a technical director. that involves a computer AND various electrical devices. plus, theres probably laws against using monkeys as part of your workforce.

i dont really get what youre trying to say. that im an asshole because i side more with people like yahtzee and bob than i do with mass effect fanboys?
Sigh...no, I'm saying that throwing around baseless moronic insults to define an entire group makes you a cockhead more deserving of the term than the people you label with it.

And yes, if you truly believe that the fate of an entire industry revolves around a single event, you're an idiot.
i never insulted anyone. all i said was that i agree more with what yahtzee and bob have said. if you honestly think that agreeing with them means that im calling all the fans cockheads then fine. thats not how i look at it but if thats how you wanna look at it then go ahead. im not saying that bioware changing their ending will suddenly mean that all game companies will have to check with their fans before releasing a game to make sure the ending is good enough. but i do believe that if this is the ending the writers had planned for the story, then they shouldnt feel obligated to change it.
 

Grivahri

New member
Mar 26, 2012
150
0
0
The reason why game critics are all against rewriting the ending is simple. They do not care about the ending or the mass effect series as much as we do. They play different games constantly and are paid to analyse whether it is good or not. The release of mass effect 3 means as much for them as any other game. The like the game but they are not emotionally attached to the game.

We, on the other hand, love the games for many different reasons other than it is an objectively good game. It is more than just a game for many of us.
 

I.Muir

New member
Jun 26, 2008
599
0
0
Suppose everybody's problem was that whoever thought up that godawful piece of shit ending had the cock for a head and not the other way around and we would be back at square one, do not collect $100. Of course I'm assuming you are saying that the developer is in the right when there is no right. This is not exactly a moral quarrel (hur hur) but rather the fans feeling betrayed because they were kicked in the teeth yet again by a previously loved developer who had, since dragon age gone into denial and has behaved as childishly as it's fans for the free publicity ever since.

So what if one company buckled under pressure from it's fans, it doesn't necessarily mean that other company's are left without the option to man up and just do whatever the hell they want. So instead of actually influencing it we should just let the publisher decide what we want which happens to be chest high walls and more cross species sex then you can poke a stick at. Unconsciously influencing that group of disconnected gits that sit at the top can't be worse than consciously doing so. Believe it or not most people are not bat shit insane so that system might even be worth a try.

Also what artistic integrity, that flew out the window way before EA got involved. Why assume that the series had a overarching vision to begin with. The theme of reapers preventing the destructive rise of other synthetics was introduced and concluded in a mere 14 lines by a hitherto unknown character at the very end. The reapers were better off being inscrutably evil like so many other villains instead of the dev pretending they are pushing some sort of boundary. The only boundary they might of pushed is shit we can get away with and still have people buy it.
 

I.Muir

New member
Jun 26, 2008
599
0
0
The video I agree with that explains why the ending is shit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MlatxLP-xs
This one more closely explains the fan rage and tears apart some of Bio Wares arguments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBETU-uOGh8
This is a douche bag who is being paid to attract free publicity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqgRP5_YKu0
This video tears apart said douche bag
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gz8_j-ebfaI&context=C45cc0a8ADvjVQa1PpcFPCatMy5RZ1RUZyZNY8ye5RqUJfcOnt1b8=

This is the -bio ware dun goofed- side summed up neatly and the only one that seems to make any sense. If you had not watched these before to preserve the integrity of your opinions I, as many other may have or will soon do so, suggest you watch them.
 

Lyri

New member
Dec 8, 2008
2,660
0
0
Seventh Actuality said:
This is kind of what happens when "games journalists" get their takes on stories from eachother instead of looking straight at the subject. The best coverage of this has actually been in Forbes, of all places.

I'm not going into all the details of why ME3's ending is objectively atrocious storytelling, because there are (sane, eloquent) people who have already done so extensively. That said...

So was the objection that audiences wanted things to finish with multiple different outcomes?
Why the fuck would you think that?
Because that is what seems to be all the complaints are about, Casey Hudson lied and said your choices would matter, be impactful and would have various outcomes.
All fans got was a different coloured explosion.
 

Frostbyte666

New member
Nov 27, 2010
399
0
0
Someone may have already mentioned this but haven't Bethesda already done a retcon ending from fan pressure with Fallout 3 (Broken Steel) and it seems developers didn't learn from that debacle. That would be don't give a nonsensical forced ending when I have many other possible options (Get in a the gas tank Fawkes you're immune to radiation and screw it's my 'destiny' my dad was the 1 who died for it why should I?)

Hmm interesting captcha 'believe me'
 

satsugaikaze

New member
Feb 26, 2011
114
0
0
Frostbyte666 said:
Someone may have already mentioned this but haven't Bethesda already done a retcon ending from fan pressure with Fallout 3 (Broken Steel) and it seems developers didn't learn from that debacle. That would be don't give a nonsensical forced ending when I have many other possible options (Get in a the gas tank Fawkes you're immune to radiation and screw it's my 'destiny' my dad was the 1 who died for it why should I?)

Hmm interesting captcha 'believe me'
A metric ton of people have already mentioned Broken Steel, and the same people don't seem to realise that the changes being demanded of Bioware are on a different wavelength.
 

w00tage

New member
Feb 8, 2010
556
0
0
>>This may be a time of politically correct inclusion of all points of view, but sooner or later the cockheads of the world are just going to have to accept that there are people who know better than them. You know. People who don't have cocks for heads. <<

Yes, and do you know what industry has the biggest population of the aforementioned cranial mutation?

Artists. Like the successful ones in Hollywood. Also like the unsuccessful formerly-of-Hollywood artists (writers and directors) that have gone to the big dollar game companies so they can get jobs working on big dollar games and "show the games industry how to tell a real story like Hollywood does".

Their eventual overreaching and faceflop-in-front-of-everyone failures are inevitable. They've done it in the media entertainment industries to the point where there's an entire subindustry making a living from analyzing the wreckage, and now that those same artists have found a new set of suckers - I mean patrons - in the gaming industry, they're going to repeat the same mistakes all over again. Because their bosses in the gaming industry don't know when to tell them no.
 

sonofliber

New member
Mar 8, 2010
245
0
0
leaving this here read it, its quite good its about "art" and whats wrong about the ending

http://doycetesterman.com/index.php/2012/03/mass-effect-tolkein-and-your-bullshit-artistic-process/

and this:

http://doycetesterman.com/index.php/2012/03/mass-effect-creative-license-and-the-rights-of-the-player-in-a-storygame-me3/
 

Mausenheimmer

New member
Feb 11, 2008
96
0
0
GartarkMusik said:
Mausenheimmer said:
GartarkMusik said:
Mausenheimmer said:
"Curing the Krogan Genophage implies that the Krogan Rebellions would start again"

No, they wouldn't because Wrex and Eve survived on my playthrough and they were determined to guide the krogan along a different path. Similarly, the geth and quarians started to get along and help each other, undermining the point that synthetics will inevitably fight organics.

But I guess paying attention to differences between playthroughs would require you to spend more than half a week thinking about it. And that requires way more effort than I've come to expect from you.
But would Wrex be able to stop them? What if a majority of the krogan want revenge for the Genophage? Wrex may be a respected leader, but he's just one krogan. If they all want blood, he may not be able to stop it happening. And let's not even get started if Wrex didn't survive and Wreav took over.........
Well, I'm pretty sure you haven't played Mass Effect 3 yet. But the game goes out of its way to make it clear that Wrex and Eve (the krogan female whose tissue was used to cure the genophage) cause a cultural paradigm shift in the krogan. Furthermore, they pretty much explain that the unintended consequence of the genophage was 1400 years of nihilism and hopelessness for the Krogan. An end to the genophage means that krogan have a tomorrow to fight for and will actually focus on rebuilding their culture again rather than fighting as hired muscle.

I could never bring myself to pull the trigger on Wrex, but from what I've read, Wreav's violent tendencies are kept in check by Eve's influence. But if Eve and Wrex are dead, then you're right. There would be no culture shift and then history would repeat itself.

But that's the problem with the ending and why everyone hates it. All of that diversity of choice is completely meaningless. The game couldn't be bothered to tell you what happens on Tunchanka after the Reaper invasion. Or anywhere else. So long as you get your 2800 Effective Military Strength in whatever way you deem fit, you have your three endings carved in stone.
Uh, I'm actually on my third playthrough of ME3, and Eve herself even said that Wrex is only one krogan, and that if the majority wants blood, he may or may not be able to stop it. I'm not saying that Wrex wouldn't bring peace to the krogan, (disregard the ending for a sec) but there would still be some krogan that need to be convinced that peace is the best option, or eliminated.
Fair enough. You didn't mention Eve in your first post and Wreav was established as a jerk in Mass Effect 2.

There would be some renegade krogan, but it wouldn't be on the same scale as the Krogan Rebellions. Eve is as important for Krogan stability as Wrex, based on how she single-handedly calmed down the bickering krogan at the start of the Shroud mission. Most of the krogan war assets also seem to imply that the krogan are eager to be the heroes of the galaxy again (based on how many clans fell in behind Urdnot and that the Terminus mercs returned to Tuchanka). Something that seems to be forgotten a lot is that virtually no krogan alive in Mass Effect 3 were around during the Krogan Rebellions. By this point, the genophage is a lot like the sins of the father being passed to the son.
 

Syzygy23

New member
Sep 20, 2010
824
0
0
satsugaikaze said:
Frostbyte666 said:
Someone may have already mentioned this but haven't Bethesda already done a retcon ending from fan pressure with Fallout 3 (Broken Steel) and it seems developers didn't learn from that debacle. That would be don't give a nonsensical forced ending when I have many other possible options (Get in a the gas tank Fawkes you're immune to radiation and screw it's my 'destiny' my dad was the 1 who died for it why should I?)

Hmm interesting captcha 'believe me'
A metric ton of people have already mentioned Broken Steel, and the same people don't seem to realise that the changes being demanded of Bioware are on a different wavelength.
I don't think that people demanding that the ending not be such a lump of shit is very far from the wavelength Fallout 3 was on.

See, here's an easy way to prevent this from happening in the future: When a developer is writing a game, they should rate everything they write on a scale from Shit to Ten. If you rate what you write anything less than Ten you rewrite it.
 

Marik Bentusi

Senior Member
Aug 20, 2010
541
0
21
wintercoat said:
Sigh...Okay, I am going to completely explain the retardedness that is the "synthetics created to kill organics to prevent synthetics from killing organics" thing. Ready?

The Reapers were created, not to kill advanced organic life, but to ascend it to the singularity of form that the Reapers are. This is done to stop the creation of synthetic life that will wipe out all organic life, from complex animals to simple bacterium, to even strings of amino acids and proteins. They view Reaper-fication as a gift. They don't view the deaths of trillions as a loss, because they go into the manufacture of what they view as a perfect being.

Sure, it's still bat-shit insane, but from a cold logic standpoint, it makes a weird sense.
Doesn't for me. I admit my experiences with Mass Effect were superficial, so feel free to correct me anywhere, but I distinctly remember one of the Reapers mentioning the Mass Relays ensure that Organics evolve among the paths they desire. Does that mean they /want/ them to come up with crazy AI? Are they just too lazy to mentor Organics while the crazy AI outbreak can still be stopped? The Protheans certainly seemed good at controlling the evolution of the species until the Reapers woke up. Seems like somebody is too lazy to install anti-virus software and decides to reinstall Windows every 50k years.

But that's mostly speculation, if we look at what's actually going on in the galaxy, we see Geth that want to live in peace but are denied exactly that, we see Geth going batshit crazy because of Reaper indoctrination and we see EDI who is everything but a crazy rebelling AI. So synthetics seem like pretty cool people unless you brainwash them. What else have we got? A history of Krogan, organics, that nearly killed everything in their path. We got a lot of political disputes and wars on record whereas the Geth have achieved some sort of Utopian democracy as long as everybody is synched once in a while so everyone can understand each other's viewpoint.

In the face of that, synthetics seem like a much much smaller threat than organics, and even if they wiped out all organics, it would be more like natural selection and the survivors would be much more civilized people than any other species.
 

WarpZone

New member
Mar 9, 2008
423
0
0
See, this is what I'm talkin' about. Fans don't want them to change the ending, they just want to feel like the choices they made *mattered.* Hell, even if it was just single freeze frames during the credits of individual satellite characters trying to cope with one of three aftermaths going on in the background, that would have tied everything together. Players would have felt like "Okay, the COMPLETE ending to MY Mass Effect story would have cost WAY too much to script, voice, animate, and pre-render, but hey, at least it's ADDRESSED. Hey, look, there's my love interests in half-reaver form standing on a ruined Earth. At least that's something. I wonder what they're saying to each other." That would have avoided the entire controversy.
 

MonkeyPunch

New member
Feb 20, 2008
589
0
0
Still giggling at the fact that there's still 14 pages of replies on this subject, at this point.

TBH I think game companies just need to stop releasing any info on the games they are making so far in advance then they'd save themselves all this hassle.
Of course it wouldn't put an end to it because you'd still have the fans whining that there was no info on something... but there'd be slightly less of it and more bearable whining.
 

walrusaurus

New member
Mar 1, 2011
595
0
0
he more or less nailed what I hated about the ending. I didn't mind the content so much as the way it was presented. I honestly would have perfered that the entire dialogue with the child-god-thing and the subsequent red/blue/green choice was ommited. The endings were all functionally the same anyways, so I don't really see what the point of the choice was, you stop the reapers, stop the in a slightly more dickish way, or stop them in a slightly weirder way. NO matter what you pick shittons of primary charecters die, the mass relays are destroyed, and the galaxy is 'saved.' So why did they not simply cut straight to the giant space lazer firing after you hit the button? Their attempt to provide an illusion of choice cheapened the whole process. THat and the lack of resolution for my crew. All they had to do was have a shot of a funeral, the dead crew members in caskets, and whoever survived mourning around them. It would have taken all of 5 seconds of screen time. At the very least they should let you see what happened to whoever you romanced. What the hell happened to Tali?????