Gather said:
It's actually Valve that's being the greedy company here (Or well... Both companies being the "greedy company" just Valve being greedier). The "restrictive" polices has nothing to do with spying, it has something to do with the delivery of downloadable content. Valve wants a slice out of those sales as well now.
Before you go off saying "But Dragon Age 1 had DLCs not sold by valve!" That is because they signed a different contract so it wasn't applied retroactively... Unlike Dragon Age 2 or Crysis 2. Didn't you connect the dots here and notice that Dragon Age 2 and Crysis 2 were both taken down the same time they released some new DLC? Although it's brilliant watching the amount of company loyalty you're showing to Valve by putting EA up as the bastards in this ordeal "just cause".
Valve doesn't have to do a thing and they will win the argument simply because of their fans jumping the gun and assuming it's the other companies fault and not theirs.
Except, for us, it's "brilliant" watching people make the wrong assumptions about why Crysis 2 and Dragon Age 2 were removed from the Steam store and then turn around and defend EA.
Allow me to, once again, repost something I already said:
Vigormortis said:
Oddly enough, that's a scenario that played out in my head when I heard this bit of news. Thinking on it as if Valve and EA were a couple of snot-nosed kids in school.
'Course, it's the same thing I thought of when EA started all of this PR bullshit back when they pulled the same shenanigans with Crysis 2 and Dragon Age 2. (for those who don't know, EA basically made any and all further DLC, updates, and bug fixes available ONLY on Origin. Thus nerfing the Steam version, and all other versions for that matter. Hence, why Valve removed those games from the Steam store. This was around the time EA started pointing the finger at Valve saying they had adopted "restrictive policies". Funny how, even after MONTHS of spewing this bullshit, they've yet to actually SAY what those policies are.)
Still, you typing it out mustered a few laughs from me. So thanks. Made my otherwise miserable day a bit better. (not related to the topic)
Basically, Valve didn't want to sell broken versions of the games to their users. Never having the possibility of getting the patches or DLC. Anyone who already bought the games still have access to them on their accounts, though. Also, I hardly consider it being "greedy" for Valve to expect a company to share in the DLC sales when Valve is paying to host, provide, and advertise said content. It'd be like a clothier selling clothes in a store and expecting the store to NOT take any money from the sale.
It's funny. To me, the PR EA has been using for the past year has been laughably bad and blatantly childish. Yet, as is evident here, a lot of people are actually falling for it. It's fascinating, really. I guess I've not given their PR department enough credit.
I suppose EA's childish, whiny bitching is more appealing and more relate-able to the generally "childish" internet culture than Valve's more level-headed, adult attitude. I.E. avoiding the mud-slinging and turning the other cheek.