I though it was because he didn't want to community to separate, or something like thatFredvdp said:Notch also won't release Minecraft on Steam for the exact same reason.
The only way not to is to not buy the game, not to not play it. A difference that I'm sure some will appreciate.Kaymish said:basically no matter what we are being shoehorned into Origin and the only way not to is not play the game
I thought that at first, but then I was thinking "why mention something that obvious". I'm gonna eye them suspiciously because i'm expecting it to need a constant connection.anthony87 said:But...if the multiplayer is online wouldn't you NEED a constant connection to...y'know, stay connected?Jellly said:"Playing Mass Effect 3 multiplayer will require a constant connection."
Well there's plenty of other games to play anyway, looks like ME3 can wait.
Translation:Logan Westbrook said:Mass Effect 3 Gives Steam a Miss at Launch
EA blames Valve for Mass Effect 3 not appearing on Steam.
It seems that the spat between EA and Valve over Steam is still going strong, as Mass Effect 3 [http://www.amazon.com/Mass-Effect-3-Xbox-360/dp/B004FYEZMQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1326587274&sr=8-2] will not appear on the service when the game launches on March 6th. Writing on the BioWare forums [http://social.bioware.com/forums/forum/Mass-Effect-3/Mass-Effect-3-General-Discussion/Origin-and-Mass-Effect-3-8975536-1.html], community co-ordinator Chris Priestly said that while ME3 would be available on certain third party download platforms, Steam would not be one of them.
The blame is once again being laid at Valve's door, with Priestly saying that Steam's restrictive policies regarding downloadable content and interaction with customers. He didn't say that the game would never be available on Steam, but implied that Valve would have to change its policy before that could happen.
"During initial release Mass Effect 3 will be available on Origin and a number of other 3rd party digital retailers, but not on Steam at this time," he wrote. "Steam has adopted a set of restrictive terms of service which limit how developers interact with customers to deliver patches and other downloadable content. We are intent on providing Mass Effect to players with the best possible experience no matter where they purchase or play their game, and are happy to partner with any download service that does not restrict our ability to connect directly with our consumers."
Priestly also made it clear that Origin would be necessary to play the game on the PC, regardless of where the copy of the game had been bought. "Mass Effect 3 will require a one time, single authorization for the single player game. There is no limit to the number of installs. Playing Mass Effect 3 multiplayer will require a constant connection ... Origin is required for the PC versions of Mass Effect 3, both physical and digital."
Mass Effect 3 comes out for PC, PS3, and Xbox 360 on March 6th.
Source: Ripten [http://www.ripten.com/2012/01/14/mass-effect-3-for-pc-will-not-be-available-on-steam/]
Permalink
And now I suddenly get all the angry comments. Seriously doubting if I will get ME 3 on the PC now.Mycroft Holmes said:It spies on you and sends back information to EA on everything you do with your computer, just so you know.Crazy_Dude said:I will get Origin anyways never heard of it but I want to freaking play Mass Effect 3.
http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/4103/originwhy.png
The_root_of_all_evil said:In other words, EA want direct access to their customers.Logan Westbrook said:and are happy to partner with any download service that does not restrict our ability to connect directly with our consumers."
Why's that EA? Given that Wadjet, Team Meat, Bioware, Bethesda, Firaxis, iD, Activision and others are still able to communicate directly - through Steam?
Is it because Steam won't give you access to customers peripheral details and software loadout - that Origin requires? And that Steam won't do unless you allow it to.
How strange.
Or is it because Steam made a billion [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/107536-Steam-Flirts-With-1-Billion-in-2010], EA lost nearly 5 billion [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/7.337275.13625063], but regained a billion through Digital - allegedly? [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.338023-EA-Breaks-a-Billion-Bucks-in-Digital]
How odd indeed.
But it must be Steam. Especially when EA have underlined exactly which parts of Steam's contract they have problems with.
Oh...
And hold on:
Mass Effect 3 will require a one time, single authorization for the single player game.But Origin is constant authorisation connection. So Single/Multi Player is constant connection, I think? Which is fine for all of us that have superfast broadband that never cuts out - which, at last count, was maybe 5% of us?Origin is required for the PC versions of Mass Effect 3, both physical and digital.
Before we even talk about the 4 separate areas between training camp and mission end that Bioware are bound to have made up - along with the two characters that rescue you - one based around mystical cybernetics and the other on pure strength.
That doesn't seem right. Quite a few games sold on Steam have DLC available on both Steam and another platform; a lot of GFWL titles do this, having DLC sold on both Steam and GFWL storefronts. I'm not sure how it affects Steamworks games, but certainly a non-Steamworks game like Mass Effect 3 would be able to handle it, I'm sure.Irridium said:And from what I know from their whole spat a while ago, it was because Steam requires DLC for Steam games to be sold on Steam. Meaning EA wouldn't be able to sell us DLC through their websites using their stupid-ass "Bioware points".
Petty? Dude, EA has shown that they're willing to take away access to your games on mere fucking suspicion or even if you just tell them they've pulled a dick move.Genericjim101 said:There's an extremely large amount of petty people who are willing to miss out on the long awaited conclusion to Mass Effect over something as trivial as a different delivery platform.