Thanks for pointing this out. I hadn't really watched anything about the IT, and I thought it was just a crazy excuse theory. But watching this has made me pull a complete 180. I definitely think it has credence. My hope is that it is true and Bioware just pulled the biggest "Gotcha" moment ever.
I do disagree with the narrator's thinking on one theory. It's his argument about Anderson during the scene with TIM. He makes the point that Anderson doesn't look at TIM when he says "They're controlling you." He claims he looks at Shepard off-shot.
I don't buy this theory, but I have one of my own. The first time I watched it during the video, he appeared like he looked at ME. That's my theory on this, it matches his, but with a slight change in detail. Anderson looks at the player, not Shepard off-shot when he says the line.
Speaking of the line, listen to how Anderson says it: "They're controlling YOU." He puts a hard emphasis on "you", and then immediately looks at the player. You can argue that he just says it harder because he's wounded and struggling with TIM control on him, or that the emphasis was only meant for TIM, but it does look suspicious.
One final note (sorry, I did not intend for this to be so long when I started writing this). I've noticed a few posters have written angry replies to the points made in the video, along with telling everyone to quit whining. Did you guys seriously just watch an hour and a half video just to troll the people on here? Get a life guys!
Seriously, I was just as skeptical as you guys (as I mentioned at the start). I thought this theory was just desperate people trying to cling to hope that the ending wasn't a big screw-up. I had accepted it as a screw-up and moved on. But I was also uninformed. That's why I watched this, to become informed. If I still thought it was nonsense, I would have at least offer intelligent counter-arguments, not just bash it.
After watching, I see where people are coming from. I'm still not completely behind the theory, but I see the argument as a possibility. The DLC will be the ultimate call on the true meaning of the ending. We just have to wait until then.
I do disagree with the narrator's thinking on one theory. It's his argument about Anderson during the scene with TIM. He makes the point that Anderson doesn't look at TIM when he says "They're controlling you." He claims he looks at Shepard off-shot.
I don't buy this theory, but I have one of my own. The first time I watched it during the video, he appeared like he looked at ME. That's my theory on this, it matches his, but with a slight change in detail. Anderson looks at the player, not Shepard off-shot when he says the line.
Speaking of the line, listen to how Anderson says it: "They're controlling YOU." He puts a hard emphasis on "you", and then immediately looks at the player. You can argue that he just says it harder because he's wounded and struggling with TIM control on him, or that the emphasis was only meant for TIM, but it does look suspicious.
One final note (sorry, I did not intend for this to be so long when I started writing this). I've noticed a few posters have written angry replies to the points made in the video, along with telling everyone to quit whining. Did you guys seriously just watch an hour and a half video just to troll the people on here? Get a life guys!
Seriously, I was just as skeptical as you guys (as I mentioned at the start). I thought this theory was just desperate people trying to cling to hope that the ending wasn't a big screw-up. I had accepted it as a screw-up and moved on. But I was also uninformed. That's why I watched this, to become informed. If I still thought it was nonsense, I would have at least offer intelligent counter-arguments, not just bash it.
After watching, I see where people are coming from. I'm still not completely behind the theory, but I see the argument as a possibility. The DLC will be the ultimate call on the true meaning of the ending. We just have to wait until then.