So they gave you that crappy ending to the trilogy... and then they are continuing the series?! I dont see why they didnt just do what I said they should do, especially given that they are continuing the series as that is the primary concept behind my idea.
Basically my idea was that Shepard failed against odds that he really shouldnt have beaten anyway, and the series continues 50,000 years later with new races who have a better chance of beating the Reapers because of your efforts in the first 3 games and the things Shepard and the Alliance left behind. That would have explained a 4th game in the series, the current ending certainly does not.
Basically my idea was that Shepard failed against odds that he really shouldnt have beaten anyway, and the series continues 50,000 years later with new races who have a better chance of beating the Reapers because of your efforts in the first 3 games and the things Shepard and the Alliance left behind. That would have explained a 4th game in the series, the current ending certainly does not.