Wingmna said:
I think you missed a big point about Lee's new job: that he isn't a game designer and was hired by a company thatpublishes very few first-party games.
What MS probably hired Lee for was to fund out just what could be done with Natal when you push it to its limits. This inormation will be used to help developers know what is feasable to develop. I'm convinced that MS hired Lee because they themselves are not quite sure of what Natal can do, and they want a second opinion from someone with experience in the field. I wouldn't expect to see any crazy game ideas come from Lee, but he may be credited with coming up for a new technique for game development.
Actually wrong. I never generalised about what MS did or didn't need from Lee, I know they hired him because he knows technology... Actually I state that.
Unlike you who generalised what my meaning and intent was. Yes, I referenced what he did in terms of the Wii, that is only natural considering that is why he has fame. And I only mentioned it because the people I was quoting referred to it.
Odd. I quoted every line in your message. So if I missed something, it's probably because you didn't put it in. Perhaps your typing got ahead of your thinking.
Wow man. Just wow. I meant you missed the purpose of my post. Just give up man, not even on the same intellectual level.
Clue in. You just said that Nintendo wouldn't hire a guy who isn't asian. So I assume you're accusing Nintendo of being racist. Either that means you're unaware that they have a North American division, thus obviously no problems with hiring someone not of Japanese descent. Or you hold the racist ideals that people of Japanese descent are racist against those who are not. Or.. I suppose it could be that you simply are incapable of writing out what you're thinking in a coherent manner. This would actually match the problem we had in the first paragraph.
Firstly, you do know I wrote that? If anyone has a 'clue in' it is me?
Okay, do you know how sentences work? Well, basically words are added together and become meaningful. Should I let you re-read what I said? Or should I grace you with telling what is meant from that sentence?
Since I'm such I nice person, I won't torture you over the meaning. Well, you see, in Japan (hence Japanese company), they speak a different language. This language is called Japanese. Now assuming that Lee sounds like he knows the English language quite well, and he probably knows much about the Chinese/Mandarin language. That is of course assuming he is Chinese American rather then actually being Japanese (since I don't think Lee as a surname is common in Japan). Not only is there a language barrier, but a culture one too. But you get the idea about what trouble it may cause Nintendo to hire a man who lives in America.
Was that simple enough for you that time? Not so racist now is it? Next time, read stuff more carefully before throwing racist around at a guy who had thousands of his 'people' protect Jews at the cost of their own lives from racism in WW2.
It is completely obvious the one of the reasons why Lee got hired is because of his current location. Hell, the is obvious again considering this is AMERICAN news that is on American websites, the Japanese will hear none of this.
Ironic, you thinking I'd missed the point of your paragraph when actually you completely missed the point of mine. I used Bill Gates as an example of someone who, it turned out, didn't know his technology as well as people from outside his company.. who eventually developed memory expanders to go well beyond his expectations of what could be done with his technology. Perhaps I was a bit too optimistic in guessing what you'd be able to infer from the fairly obvious example. My error, I should have tried harder to write to the level of my reader.
You do know what replying means don't you? Your post must be a reaction to my post, that is what replying means.
You came up with a defense of 'oh Bill Gates was really smart so im right and ur wrong', not much of a point considering Bill Gates. One, this is a completely different situation, Bill Gates developed his stuff in secret. Two, you really have no idea what Nintendo does or does not know, it is moronic assume the worst and think Nintendo has never even thought of what other things their Motion Sensor can do and it is even MORE moronic to think Nintendo hasn't seen a Youtube video that has had 10million view (not including the video being on other sources, e.g. other video sites or passed on via file on email). Three, Bill Gates developed that in a totally different condition, this isn't the 80s or 90s anymore. And of course, you really have no idea if this is true in this situation because it hasn't panned out like the Bill Gates thing did, ATM it is Nintendo who is the Bill Gates that knows exactly what they are doing and the markets prove this... While all you have is "LEE IS LIKE BILL GATES JUST JUST JUST CAUSE MS HIRED HIM!!!!"
So yes, your meaning was confusing since you didn't specifically state at all, "this is an example of how one man can do what a whole company hasn't and this relates to Lee". Sorry, but again, it is moronic to actually believe that Nintendo is only a shell company and that everyone knows what they are like by looking at the tiny peak of the iceberg rather then think there is a huge mass under the water.
Oh, do try to keep up. Developers received their development kits for Natal during the E3 conference.. ergo, the hardware is ready to go. If Nintendo is going to put together a bag of hardware goodies, they'd best do it soon if they hope to have it out before the third-party developers for MS start putting out actual software for Natal.
You do know developer kits are basically just media kits don't you? They pretty much contain what MS should at their conference. Developer kits contain no hardware.
And I doubt this will be ready within 2009, if it was they would have released AT LEAST an estimated time frame. There is nothing atm, with the complexity of natal it would take huge amounts of time to develop it enough to be ready for public release. We all know what happens when MS released something before it was ready....
Actually, no, that wasn't at all what you stated. It may have been what you meant, but it certainly wasn't what you wrote. This is the problem we're having. As for the insults, had you not felt the need to include insults in your post, you would have received none in return, as, if you'll care to note, any I made relied almost entirely on your previous ones.
The 'all I stated in the first post' thing was a direct reference to my first post noting ALL of what I said in it, not 'I'm repeating myself here just like my first post'... Are you seriously that much of an idiot that you thought that when I stated that, that I was referring to what I said within the same post then referring that bit to my first post?
Anyway, that's what I think you mean, you can't seem to understand very much, you are taking everything out of context and making it mean something totally different.
So, if you STILL don't understand, the paragraph that YOU quoted (the "otherwise, any insults...) was referring to MY FIRST POST, which I made because people were spamming saying Nintendo were idiots like good like PS3 and Xbox360 fanboys who are so blind that they can't that MS and Sony are failing to understand how the market works and failing to understand what Nintendo is doing. EVERYONE knew, including Nintendo that if Wii took off they were going to copy them... BECAUSE SONY AND MS ARE A VOID OF EMPTY IDEAS, whether in gaming or in business.
Why did you only reply to one paragraph btw?
Oh yes, I guess the whole thing at once is too hard for you, and you'd rather get lazy and just take one part of my post out of context and reply to that.
Insulting: my first post wasn't a reply to you, so I don't know where you get this idea that I started this when you were the first one that called me a racist. My 'the stupidity here is amazing' was not directly aimed at you, or rather anyone since I didn't specifically mention one or some persons.
And... You do know you were the first one telling me that I should grow a brain?
Wow, can't even remember what you posted. Hypocrite much? No wonder I keep calling you an idiot.
Don't get me wrong, I'm actually a proud Wii owner and supporter, and I don't think any software developers have come anywhere near to tapping the full potential of the wii-mote to date -- and that includes Nintendo. But missing out on hiring innovative thinkers like Lee is part of the reason why. Are his tech-demos whizz bang impressive? Sorta. They're rather small, and crude, like you point out, but they're also revolutionary in that they take things that were possible only through massively expensive systems, and translated them down into a couple hundred bucks.
I just spent my list few posts explaining why Nintendo didn't hire him and why they didn't need to hire him.
Lee didn't come up with that idea, of sticking something on your head and the screen follows it to imitate 3d. Sure he worked it out and showed perfectly how it could be done, etc, but I have no doubts that Nintendo already thought of it considering the design of the Wii itself (the Wii being the motion sensor and having all the power rather then the sensor bar having it). The internals of all companies have vast and vast amounts of information and knowledge that doesn't get out into the public, whether MS, Sony or Nintendo, the public only ever sees the tiny tiny tip of the iceberg that these companies are.
This is where Nintendo needs to be concerned, because if Lee can pull this off on his own, unfunded, with consumer grade parts, think of what he'll be able to do funded by Microsoft and with access to the latest tech money can buy + some tech that money can't. Yeah, Nintendo's done great by marketing a system that meets the needs of the masses at a price point they can afford. Jonny Lee has managed to replicate a system that sells for upwards of five figures regularly (go price out a large multi-touch whiteboard) for just over 200 bucks -- and made it portable in your pocket at the same time. He's managed to put single user 3D into a normal display system for about the same price point, something that previously either simply wasn't done or would tend to invoke eyestrain and nausea. (Oh, and incidentally.. your claims about the amount of processing it would take aren't true. Games like RE5 already make all the calculations about what you see based on your position in the game. Lee's system simply changes that to your actual position in front of the television.) What you don't seem to understand about Lee's work isn't that it's huge, but that it's so amazingly simple and elegant.. that's a hard thing to come by, and it's something that Microsoft, if it wants to hit the mass market, really needs.
Like I noted earlier, Lee is a smart guy and he got a job, doesn't make him revolutionary. There are many hackers on the Wii, doing all kinds of things with it... And Nintendo knew all these things could be done because they designed the Wii and made sure any normal person couldn't use those aspects on purpose. E.G. Wii can play DVDs technically, but Nintendo doesn't let users use this aspect because of some important reasons (because Nintendo is sticking solely to gaming, because they would have to pay for the DVD rights, etc) and this is exactly the same for the head movement. Nintendo knew that the Wii Remote had a IR camera, thousands of tech people already knew what this technology did and guessed what it could do via hacks. Good for Lee for expanding it and getting it into the public, but it isn't a special flower, it has been known for a long period (most likely when it was announced) that the technology in the Wii remote can be used else where.
Great, Lee found a job, I'm happy, but Nintendo had very good reasons not to hire him. He isn't a special and is the only one who knew what this technology could do, he was just the one to blog about it and get his video on youtube. He will be a great asset to MS, but that never meant Nintendo would or even could hire him.
The Wii is far from "only does tracking", of course he could do IR tracking outside of the Wii, the Wii is made for games... Not ONLY IR tracking, again, this isn't revolutionary. Saying he can do what the Wii does in a pen is moronic considering Wii is a gaming system and not something you solely use for writing on boards with. Sorry but thinking the IR in a pen that comes from a Wiimote is as good as a Wii is beyond idiotic, Wii is a gaming platform, it is far more then just an IR machine. Anyway, the technology he uses he got from a wii, so how would 'making into a pocket pen' when the pocket pen is using the Wii's technology?
Can RE5 run in imitation 3d? Maybe, personally I don't think its that simple, they'd need to create a new process for enabling it and it would probably be impossible on current gen consoles and even the game since it might require a totally different way of processing information, a way that wouldn't exist on current gen consoles.