McCain?

Recommended Videos

TheKnifeJuggler

New member
May 18, 2008
310
0
0
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835348 said:
TheKnifeJuggler post=18.74460.835335 said:
Lots and lots of post stuff.
Per the last block:

That is seeing everything from one side of the fence, and one side of the fence only.
The heck?

I do not see how that is on any side of a fence. I'll admit I am against McCain, but that does not mean I am Pro-Obama.
I made a statement pointing out the error in your logic, and the only way you seem to reply is by calling it one sided.
You're not defending your side, you're simply seeing what you want to see.
 

TheKnifeJuggler

New member
May 18, 2008
310
0
0
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835383 said:
Once again:

The.economy.would.have.plummeted.if.we.would.have.never.gone.to.Iraq.anyway.
If. We. Had. Focused. On. Our. Economy. Instead. Of. Wasting. Funding. On. A. War. It. Wouldn't. Have.
 

OuroborosChoked

New member
Aug 20, 2008
558
0
0
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835401 said:
High road.
As in, I can't defend my decision, so I'll pretend I don't care what anyone else says, but continually remind everyone that I'm taking the "high road" by not debating the issues?

Some high road.

Avoiding the subject you brought up because you can't answer simple questions is not the high road. It's cowadice.
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
You know your campaign is in trouble when attack adverts actually seem like a good idea compared to your alternatives.
TheKnifeJuggler post=18.74460.835416 said:
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835383 said:
Once again:

The.economy.would.have.plummeted.if.we.would.have.never.gone.to.Iraq.anyway.
If. We. Had. Focused. On. Our. Economy. Instead. Of. Wasting. Funding. On. A. War. It. Wouldn't. Have.
I felt that you needed to be backed up with a source, so here you go. Here's the figures for how much the Iraq War has cost your economy.
http://zfacts.com/p/447.html
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
TheKnifeJuggler post=18.74460.835425 said:
Johnn Johnston post=18.74460.835419 said:
You know your campaign is in trouble when attack adverts actually seem like a good idea compared to your alternatives.
Zing.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. I'm here all week, tip the waitresses.
 

BigKingBob

New member
Aug 27, 2008
100
0
0
King Hippo post=18.74460.835413 said:
We, the Obamalites, forecast a crushing victory, therefore we dont need to act like haters.

What happend hear is that Obama has a lead in MULTIPLE states, while mccain is high suport in some states.

The exact oposite of the bush vs algore fiasco from years ago.
But doesnt the entire outcome of the US election depend on the results from a very small number of states? (Like 5 or less)

Obama could stil easily lose this thing, I dont want him to but I can see it happening.

Your electoral college system really does suck ass
 

mike1921

New member
Oct 17, 2008
1,292
0
0
2. McCain's supporters are racists, bigots, and igorant fucks who continue to chant debunked "facts". All that shit like "Obama is only one letter away from Osama" and "Obama's a secret muslim". What the fuck is a "secret muslim" anyway? And what does that even matter? Muslim does not equal TERRORIST. A vote for McCain is a vote for these kinds of people having a voice in the highest office this country has.
You really can't blame McCain for that. He'd get an endorsement from the KKK no matter what he supports.
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
mike1921 post=18.74460.835440 said:
2. McCain's supporters are racists, bigots, and igorant fucks who continue to chant debunked "facts". All that shit like "Obama is only one letter away from Osama" and "Obama's a secret muslim". What the fuck is a "secret muslim" anyway? And what does that even matter? Muslim does not equal TERRORIST. A vote for McCain is a vote for these kinds of people having a voice in the highest office this country has.
You really can't blame McCain for that. He'd get an endorsement from the KKK no matter what he supports.
Ah, but you can blame him for using adverts and rhetoric in speeches which inspire such behaviour.
 

OuroborosChoked

New member
Aug 20, 2008
558
0
0
mike1921 post=18.74460.835440 said:
2. McCain's supporters are racists, bigots, and igorant fucks who continue to chant debunked "facts". All that shit like "Obama is only one letter away from Osama" and "Obama's a secret muslim". What the fuck is a "secret muslim" anyway? And what does that even matter? Muslim does not equal TERRORIST. A vote for McCain is a vote for these kinds of people having a voice in the highest office this country has.
You really can't blame McCain for that. He'd get an endorsement from the KKK no matter what he supports.
Can't I?

You've seen the videos, yeah?

Now are you going to tell me every time someone shouts, "Kill him!" at one of his rallies, he can't say, "No. We're not going to talk like that. I'm not going to encourage that kind of thing. Please leave." Or SOMETHING along those lines. Something RESPONSIBLE. Something that follows the lines of "calls for assassination are not okay in presidential races".
 

Lazzi

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,013
0
0
Im not really anti McCain, Im not even pro Obama.

Both choices are rather scary. Obama doestn have as much experience as I would like for our leader to have, and Im very concernd about how the silent masses of racist people will react if he becomes president. Face it thousand of people belive he's a terrorist and there for as soon as he reaches office they will no longer fallow the laws becuase they are the laws of an "enemy combatant". And he seems to be a bit to socail for my liking. Im all for universal health care (a perfect copy of the british NHS woudl make me perfectly giddy), but he still makes me uneasy.

While McCain would be a great choice to "lose" (I'm a moderate democrat) to. Hes a moderate republican, so his views are more realistic than the rest of his party. And socialy we would probely be much more stable, there wouldnt be such a terribel active regection (ok so a few hundred people may accues the goveremtn of tampering with the votes in order to keep a republican in office). How ever McCains age does leave some problems. He seems healthy enough right now but, but time has this habit of being a ***** and there is a very realistic possblity that McCain may die in office (should he win the election). So if McCain dies that would leave us with Palin *shudder*, and should she make it to office (I would like her to get shoot by Dick Cheny, this would atleast mean that bushes office did some thing good) I will proptly leave teh england and restart my life under the name Zeb Atlas.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Wardog13 post=18.74460.835146 said:
zirnitra post=18.74460.834898 said:
I'm not American, but if McCain gets in I will loose all faith in humanity and likely kill myself out of disgust and will be making that fact very clear in my suicide note.
Here is a question why do you care who wins office in a forign state, unless you are Iran it dosent really affect you.
Ok, thats ridiculus - the USA is a huge economic and military power - whoever wins their, the rest of the world IS affected. The reserve is true, but to a significantly smaller degree, for now.
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
Lazzi post=18.74460.835457 said:
Im all for universal health care (a perfect copy of the british NHS woudl make me perfectly giddy), but he still makes me uneasy.
Hopefully not a carbon copy. We've got some serious flaws in it over here. But, if they could be sorted out, I see no reason why a universal healthcare system shouldn't be set up (provided the people treated had not brought it upon themselves).
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Lazzi post=18.74460.835457 said:
Im all for universal health care (a perfect copy of the british NHS woudl make me perfectly giddy), but he still makes me uneasy.
You might prefer one that's efficient and works better than ours ;)
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835478 said:
Not worth arguing over.
Can you clarify what part isn't worth debating over? There have been several topics in this thread. I hope you aren't saying that the whole topic isn't worth arguing over, because I always love to have my political views challenged in a debate.

*EDIT* Whoah, triple ninja.
 

edinflames

New member
Dec 21, 2007
378
0
0
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835281 said:
McCain actually has the potential to do something.
Obama just waves his hand like a celeberity. Couldn't they have at least gotten someone like Brad Pitt to do that? Hell it'd be like electing the same man...

On a fair note, the reason people despise Bush and McCain is because they fail to see the good accomplished by the Bush administration. We took an enemy that wanted to attack us and moved the target from our homeland to a location in the Middle East. Sorry that we don't have time to spend money on "social programs" due to an economy that was bound to collapse regardless if we had gone to war, when the previous administration failed to properly take care of the leftovers Bush had to deal with.

So what if he did lie?

You'd stutter too if you had so many countries which wished to wipe your country off the face of the earth without justification.
Watch the BBC documentary "The Power of Nightmares". 3 Part series tells full history of the neo-cons and al-qaida. You have been lied to quite a lot, for quite a long time.

McCain will continue to lie. He will 'Bomb bomb Iran'. People like you may even call out for him to do it, as the White House pumps out fear-mongering reports. The world will be a sh*ttier place.

The concept that America is a nation with a unique destiny - to be the force for good and freedom in the world, where evil enemies threaten its very existence and must be defeated - is an invented one. Developed by the pre-neo-con political philosopher Leonard Strauss, as he believed the people of a nation required a mythological element to their identity, to give ordinary people a sense of purpose, a collective destiny, in order to provide social cohesion and order, to combat the excesses of liberalism; the truth need only be known by the intellectual ruling class, who apparently guide America towards its global manifest destiny. Look into your own history, this myth is less than 60 years old. The notion that Al-Qaida is a mafia like organisation with sleeper cells in over 50 countries, is similarly a false invention, devised after the first WTC bombing so that Bin Laden could be prosecuted in his absence back in the 90's - a false invention which stuck, since it gives us an identifiable enemy. The real threat, the real Al-Qaida is the ideology which creates suicide bombers, and the Western World has entirely failed to combat that. Probably because bombing people does not really bring them round to your way of thinking.

The rhetoric being used today by governments around the world, not just the bush administration closely resembles that used by Reagan and the neo-cons in the 1980's, after the falsified CIA reports were used to justify greater military spending (Star Wars - bad joke).

Similarly, until the Monica Lewinsky business (boy did Billy f*ck up there) the sh*t dished out in the news about him being corrupt - having ludicrous numbers of sexual partners, using drugs while in office - were all false. A hack journalist was paid a LOT of money on behalf of a neo-con thinktank to assemble a team to dig up dirt and make stories where there was none.

Democrats lie as well as the Republicans, the difference is: when the Republicans lie, they lie BIG. War big. Its not like Obama is going to change the world, or put everything to rights, but surely its got to be better than another old white Republican.

On a slight tangent: The only two republics in the history of the world which have risen to position of no.1 world power are those of the USA and Rome. It took two generations for Rome to change from Republic to Empire, elected Senate to hereditary Monarchy. Worth remembering.

Apologies for length.
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
AgentCLXXXIII post=18.74460.835281 said:
McCain actually has the potential to do something.
Nope, he doesn't.

If elected, McCain will be facing Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress. Hell, right now there's a good chance that the Democrats could get fillibuster-proof control of both houses.

Recent events have also shown that McCain is likely to have a lot of trouble controlling his own party. Remember that whole thing when he flew to Washington to pass the bail-out and then all the other Republicans decided it was a bad idea? Doesn't bode well for his ability to rally his own party around his legislative agenda.

So, the McCain tax cut and the McCain health plan and the McCain spending freeze are already dead regardless of who wins the election, because the legislature is going to be ridiculously hostile to any of those things.

As the executive, McCain would still have a lot of power over our actions in Iraq. His ability to really "do something" in Iraq is still going to be constrained by Congressional budgets, however.

So, what's left? Foreign relations and Supreme Court justices?

-- Alex
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
BigKingBob post=18.74460.835439 said:
Your electoral college system really does suck ass
It's actually a good thing it keeps some states from having too much say in elections. An example(of no EC system) would be Il. Chicago controls that states agenda because it is the premire population center. So the electoral college system allows lesser states and population centers a bigger say in running the country. Without the EC the northeast would have the biggest control of elections leaving the south and midwest with very little imput into elections.