Microsoft Drops Xbox One DRM Restrictions - UPDATED

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
Arnoxthe1 said:
ITT: People thinking they're not going to buy the One but I'm sure that once it's released, they'll be clambering over themselves to get one. Especially when Halo 5 begins to show its tight little *** over the horizon.
Why is it so hard to accept that most gamers simply don't play Halo?
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
So, two ideas run through my mind:

1) They actually planed this in advance, to pull off some kind of "Coca-Cola Classic" strategy.

2) They actually were going to go with what they were originally planning, but seeing Sony's strategy (of pissing on them) and saw that they were pissing off far to many possible customers (like the US Navy) and decided to actually smarten up.

Im leaning towards 2, obviously...
 

thisbymaster

New member
Sep 10, 2008
373
0
0
That scream you heard was the credibility of every last person that defended Microsoft this whole time disappearing.
 

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,226
0
0
Anyone else imagine Don what's his name typing all that with gritted teeth and a gun to his head?

Now if they only dropped the Kinect requirement.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
This has been one of the most insane few weeks in gaming history that I can remember.
 

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
WanderingFool said:
They actually planed this in advance, to pull off some kind of "Coca-Cola Classic" strategy.
Yeah, and when they were praising the Cloud, and declaring that online is the future and offline is the past, they were secretly knowing that they will turn all that shit off anyways and sell a type of outdated console that they are just bashing...
 

wulfy42

New member
Jan 29, 2009
771
0
0
Still no reason for me to buy an Xbox, but at least this leaves it open for them to create a reason later on for me to buy one. If they do some good things with the kinect....well, I'll keep an open mind...and they may sell one to me someday.

This is, over all, a win for gamers though. I have to say as a very very long term gamer (all the way back to the first games) who has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years on games, consoles etc.....I am tired of being treated like a criminal and having to deal with DRM etc just so people who are not going to spend money on games anyway...have a slightly harder time getting them for free.

I do think switching to digital over all is a good idea, reducing the cost to manufacture and ship games, and giving that savings to consumers (us). Lower the price of games while making them more accessable and less people will pirate it (not to mention if you buy a digital copy it's not going to be sold to gamestop for $5...then resold to someone for $30 preventing a full sale for the original producers).

I am....becoming spoiled by steam etc. I almost don't want to bother with physical copies of games anymore, and both systems (the ps4 and Xbox one) can handle using a mostly if not total digital game catalog for players. It should be an option....and a cheaper option at that....but there is no reason not to make digital copies available...and cheaper...for everyone at this point.
 

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
thisbymaster said:
That scream you heard was the credibility of every last person that defended Microsoft this whole time disappearing.
Don't worry about them, they will just complain about how all the rage was unnecessary to begin with since Microsoft is evidently listening after all and gives what we want, or whatever.
 

gyroscopeboy

New member
Nov 27, 2010
601
0
0
Unless they fired the people who thought it was a good idea in the first place, I don't see this convincing me they have my best interests at heart, and aren't just caving to social pressure.
 

unstabLized

New member
Mar 9, 2012
660
0
0
thethird0611 said:
unstabLized said:
Busard said:
Soxafloppin said:
I'm a Sony/Nintendo fan through and through but this is great news.

A victory for the consumer!
Let's make it clear
The consumer won NOTHING here, or maybe it looks like it did, on the surface.

But Microsoft didn't listen to the consumer. It listened to it's sales chart. The ones that were indicating their consoles were being outsold almost 5 to 1 in their own country of prevalence.

If the odds weren't so contrasted, trust me, they would've done NOTHING even if we complained twice as much. If they were alone facing nintendo, they would've made the requirements even probably worse.

It's a good thing but for me, it's just mostly shows how slimy m$ is. How pathetic their attempts of saying "BUT CLOUD GAMING IS MANDATORY", how they were so arrogant about it, how it couldn't be changed.

And people will praise them for this too, holy shit
This. ALL of this. And I hate the fact that people will turn RIGHT around and call them "sensible" and that they "listened to the customer". Bullshit. They didn't listen to crap except their own wallets screaming.
You two seem to not know anything about what just happened.... They LISTENED to the customers. They LISTENED that the customers werent going to BUY their console because of DRM.

Customers: "We arent buy this consle because of DRM!"
Microsoft: "Sir, we are losing sales because the customers arent buying the console because of DRM."

Do you think Sony really cares about you? They are doing the same thing, they are making their console to HELP THEIR WALLETS.

OT: Im actually thinking of buying an X1 now. Just gotta get the funds.
Of course not. Both companies are after the money, but Sony made good business decisions regarding the current situation. I said in another post, Sony didn't do anything mind-blowing. They didn't do anything, but compared to what MS did, it came out to gold. What I'm saying is that MS listened to Xbones not selling. If PS4 had DRM like Xbone, then I doubt they would change anything.. Unless people didn't buy either console, but I doubt that would happen.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Alright everyone! Now just pile on the hate for the new Kinect-mandatory aspect so they'll get rid of that and this console just might be buyable!

Seriously, if they REALLY want to push the Kinect onto us, there's at least a less heavy-handed way to do it: include it with the new console, but make it optional. Developers will still make games for it seeing as how they know everyone's got one, but you get NONE of the drawbacks of people being forced to install an audio/video camera in their livingroom that constantly watches them and can read their heart rate...seriously, I still don't understand why the hell a game console accessory would need to do that...
 

Nowhere Man

New member
Mar 10, 2013
422
0
0
See? This goes to show what all this "mindless hatred" can bring about if we all voice our concerns and speak with our wallets. But Microsoft still has a ways to go. They need to get rid of the mandatory Kinect. That's still a major problem. Especially if they want to make sales to the military. They're also going to want to drop the price to compete with PS4 especially since they are supposedly underpowered compared to it.

Still not getting it though. Damage is already done and I can't trust them. Maybe a few years into its cycle if they address the Kinect issue. But I'll be way into PC gaming and PS4 goodness by then to probably even care.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
I still probably won't get one. Two reason. One:

DTWolfwood said:
Still requires Kinect? No thanks. :/
And two, they were outright dicks to us right up to the last moment. They didn't try and repair the situation until they had not only shot themselves in the foot, but amputated it and rubbed gangrenous meat on the stump. This is a bad way to get my business.
 

Reeve

New member
Feb 8, 2013
292
0
0
Amusingly when the Steam Box is released (I bet this November also) it will be the platform that MS wish their console had been. :D

 

Not Matt

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2011
555
0
21
You're still not of the hook Microsoft.
The Xbone may take used games and have no drm requirements but you are still not redeemed.
You still tried to screw over the consumers for personal gain. You still acted unreasonable and hostile when confronted about anything.
and you are still pushing shit with didn't want at us like Kinect, tv, no games and you'll still spy on us.
We do not trust you anymore.


You listened to what we wanted and you did the things we told you not to.
And now you can't even stand by it. You spineless, greedy basterds. You are far from being of the hook
 

nevarran

New member
Apr 6, 2010
347
0
0
I guess the digital gaming is delayed for another 10 years then... Shame.
Welcome back 60$ games. It may even go higher, I heard the prices of the plastic are going up.
 

unstabLized

New member
Mar 9, 2012
660
0
0
LostintheWick said:
unstabLized said:
Busard said:
Soxafloppin said:
I'm a Sony/Nintendo fan through and through but this is great news.

A victory for the consumer!
Let's make it clear
The consumer won NOTHING here, or maybe it looks like it did, on the surface.

But Microsoft didn't listen to the consumer. It listened to it's sales chart. The ones that were indicating their consoles were being outsold almost 5 to 1 in their own country of prevalence.

If the odds weren't so contrasted, trust me, they would've done NOTHING even if we complained twice as much. If they were alone facing nintendo, they would've made the requirements even probably worse.

It's a good thing but for me, it's just mostly shows how slimy m$ is. How pathetic their attempts of saying "BUT CLOUD GAMING IS MANDATORY", how they were so arrogant about it, how it couldn't be changed.

And people will praise them for this too, holy shit
This. ALL of this. And I hate the fact that people will turn RIGHT around and call them "sensible" and that they "listened to the customer". Bullshit. They didn't listen to crap except their own wallets screaming.
I'm glad this whole XB1 thing is teaching folks about what is so shitty about capitalism. It only VALUES one thing. And... btw, Sony is = MS when it comes to what motivates them.
So are you mad at Sony too? They only want money.
Can you explain about Sony's motivation? You mean the money? Not going against your saying or anything, just a bit confused is all. I don't mind that either companies are after the money as long as they deliver something that the consumers want. That's a sensible trade, isn't it?
 

Talaris

New member
Sep 6, 2010
273
0
0
Here's a phrase Pierce Brosnan taught me in the film Dante's Peak, and I'll never forget it.

"Put a frog into boiling water, and it'll jump right out. Put a frog into cold water, and slowly heat it, and it will boil to death."

"So, is that your recipe for frog soup?"

"It's my recipe for disaster."



Mark my words, they'll bring these restrictions back very slowly so as the general public are less phased by them, and sooner or later we'll be back to square one. Nothing MS say now will make me trust them, especially after the verbal shit Angry Joe had to take from Major Nelson at E3, regarding the "you want to go to the future don't you Angry Joe?" and the "are you an Xbox technician? How do you know it's simple to disable the always online?" What a nasty little man.
 

Dreadman75

New member
Jul 6, 2011
425
0
0
Busard said:
Soxafloppin said:
I'm a Sony/Nintendo fan through and through but this is great news.

A victory for the consumer!
Let's make it clear
The consumer won NOTHING here, or maybe it looks like it did, on the surface.

But Microsoft didn't listen to the consumer. It listened to it's sales chart. The ones that were indicating their consoles were being outsold almost 5 to 1 in their own country of prevalence.

If the odds weren't so contrasted, trust me, they would've done NOTHING even if we complained twice as much. If they were alone facing nintendo, they would've made the requirements even probably worse.

It's a good thing but for me, it's just mostly shows how slimy m$ is. How pathetic their attempts of saying "BUT CLOUD GAMING IS MANDATORY", how they were so arrogant about it, how it couldn't be changed.

And people will praise them for this too, holy shit
I don't think anyone will say you're wrong in your points. Hell, I agree with you 110%!

This is a glorious day! Microsoft is scrambling around trying to recoup the good will and sales they pissed away, and in the process validated all the rumors of their deceit. It's almost poetic in a way.

Personally, Microsoft doesn't deserve any of that consumer trust back, considering how they all but fucked us all over. But the power of the consumer has spoken. If Microsoft doesn't want to completely dismantle or sell off their gaming division they better learn how to play ball with the consumer.

We're the power here, not them.
 

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,226
0
0
Arnoxthe1 said:
Besides, if you guys really have a problem with privacy, then put a bloody box over the Kinect FFS.
While this is some sort of solution, it's not a very good one.

What if you don't want one at all? Can you buy the console without it?

What if you don't have space to even put a Kinect, let alone use one.

What if you don't have a lot of money and don't want to pay extra for something almost completely fucking useless barring it's advanced voice recognition (which could be implemented into a headset microphone).

Captcha: Pea brain.

Now now Captcha, you don't want to feel the banhammer do you? That's rude.