Aw, I wanted to draw rude pictures and make them show on the X-Box.
I'm serious.
But, otherwise I'd have been interested in that...
I'm serious.
But, otherwise I'd have been interested in that...
Agreed. It's one of very few things that made it seem like Kinect might have some potential. Now it sounds like they probably just put in exactly the right amount of content to make the demo look good without anything beyond it. Consider me highly disappointed.Logan Westbrook said:I must admit, I'm disappointed to hear this; not really because I wanted a digital boy of my very own, but because Milo really showed off the new things that could be done with Kinect.
It's probably not wasted.Vanguard_Ex said:Jesus, that's a hell of a lot of work to go to waste. They should really pick up on it sometime.
As opposed to Half Life 2, which cures cancer?Skopintsev said:Good, cause it looked astoundingly useless.
Now that's an interesting thought. MS developing Kinect/Natal with multiple purposes in mind, rather than purely as a gaming accessory. It would give them a chance to field-test and further develop the same tech for the PC end of things, and maybe even give them something to draw in the kind of people who use Macs "because they're easier".Woodsey said:I'll buy the Natal-ish tech for my PC though, because it's supposedly dullest application (i.e. navigating menus) is what interests me the most so far, because all the games are piss-poor.
MS aren't doing it - the company behind Natal is.Raesvelg said:Now that's an interesting thought. MS developing Kinect/Natal with multiple purposes in mind, rather than purely as a gaming accessory. It would give them a chance to field-test and further develop the same tech for the PC end of things, and maybe even give them something to draw in the kind of people who use Macs "because they're easier".Woodsey said:I'll buy the Natal-ish tech for my PC though, because it's supposedly dullest application (i.e. navigating menus) is what interests me the most so far, because all the games are piss-poor.
True. Maybe it'll be the framework for some Lionhead RPG character interactions or something.Denamic said:It's probably not wasted.Vanguard_Ex said:Jesus, that's a hell of a lot of work to go to waste. They should really pick up on it sometime.
The tech they made for it was likely for use with something else; it was just put on show in the tech demo.
Guess that's what tech demos are for.
Go figure.
That's the point! Microsoft copies Nintendo once, why not twice more?CarlosYenrac said:I think Someone Else [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Boy] may have the rights to that name alreadyWithall said:..."Kinect: Virtual Boy"