Oh good. Because I thought they weren't going to talk about games at a gaming expo. Thanks for the clear-up Microsoft, fantastic job you guys are doing over there.
Well, no... Used games and always online hardly matter if it looks like the console won't be worth anything for games anyways....JasonKaotic said:I really think we're sending Microsoft the wrong message.
Shouldn't they address the used game and semi-always-online shit before the TV thing?
And yet, they'll al try to be CoD. When I read that Microsoft is putting a billion dollars into the first batch of exclusives all I could think of was "failed expectations"MeChaNiZ3D said:You made your impression guys. Gonna have to come up with something better than CoD this time around. I mean...I love dogs, but CoD is multiplatform.
The problem with that comes when most people don't know your plans, there's a lot of people that play on XBOX but don't follow news about it. I personally read a lot of gaming related news and didn't know about it either. But spending an entire show talking about how your "gaming console" is basically a non-upgradable computer is just silly. Especially when everything they said you could do like chat, watch TV, play games and something or other that I might've forgotten, was something I could do on my PC 10 years ago. They might have said what they were going to do, but their "vision of the future" presentation was Microsoft shooting itself in the foot (you can watch TV" and "it looks like a VCR" jokes are pretty much al there is about it over here).LavaLampBamboo said:I was being sarcastic. They did exactly this from the get go and made it clear that was the approach they were takingAzhrarn-101 said:That, however, would have been sensible.LavaLampBamboo said:snip![]()
When you're a mega-corporation hellbent on dominating the livingroom, sense is the last thing you want to be making. The consumers can understand sense, duplicitous gobbledigook works so much better as a marketing tool.![]()
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/123503-Next-Xbox-Debuts-In-26-Days
That would imply that the mainstream media has any pull with gamers, which lets be honest here, it doesn't. Remember, CNN was reporting the WiiU as an expsnaion to the Wii instead of a new console for a few days. They corrected themselves, on their website....I'll leave you to imagine the effectiveness of that.Ultratwinkie said:Actually the only reason they did the TV focus was to get the mainstream media interested and drum up sales from older people.mysecondlife said:Well then they shouldn't have done the reveal
I think they only did it because Sony did it. Did a piss poor job at that..
If they did a 100% gaming machine, the media wouldn't care and it would be in the same boat as the Wii U.Media doesn't care about games that aren't on mobile devices anymore.
and not create this huge shitstorm that was an awesome free marketing? why would they. now everyone and his dog knows what Microsoft is. and in a year they will remmeber the name but not what they did, becuase thats how consumer market work - zero memory spantime.LavaLampBamboo said:Can you imagine if Microsoft had literally come out a few days before the reveal and said, no kidding, EXACTLY THIS THING? That they'd do the services like TV and sports at the reveal, then focus on games at E3? Imagine if they had made this clear in a statement a few days before the reveal.
IMAGINE THAT.
Not really. It was quite clear when they sad they are coming to E3 with 15 titles that its going to be games at E3 after what happened at reveal. Just going according to plan, no changes due to community input. dont fool yourselves, they didnt listen yet. Knowing microsoft, they probably wont.MrWunderful said:Well I for one am excited to hear what they have to say about launch titles/exclusives. Its also refreshing to hear that they have listened to the community and hopefully will learn from their mistakes.
I've got to think that anything from a third party publisher will be a timed exclusive. Can't see any third party wanting to cut off from 50% of the market unless there really are big bucks from MS. Also, some of these exclusives are going to be arm wavy and dancy games and there will be a Lionhead (Fable) thing in there too, probably.Adam Jensen said:Typo. But it really wouldn't surprise me to see Microsoft paying the publishers to have previously multiplatform titles turned into X1 exclusives. They payed $50 million for timed exclusives for GTA IV episodes.fedirko7 said:Wouldn't that leave only 4 from the previous generation? And my bets are on another Viva Pinata, because we could really do with more colorful games.
And this is the best case scenario in which Halo and Gears are two of those titles instead of some other previously multiplatform franchise.