Middle-Earth: Shadow of War Will Sell Loot Boxes as Microtransactions

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Xorph said:
erttheking said:
Not working on the buggy Arkham Origins because they were too busy working on DLC, sectioning off playable characters via pre orders, easy fatalities, the fact that they should've known Arkham knight was a mess and shouldn't have put it up in the first place, only pulling it when it was clear they weren't going to get away with it, putting it back up when it's STILL a mess, shit like that.

Oh, does that mean there's a version without the bullshit freemium currency that got slapped into the game to justify microtransactions, constantly putting my will to the test and making the game less fun? Oh wait no there isn't. And if you think they'll put them in and not skew it towards them, your expectations are unrealistically optimistic. They haven't done it in the past? In the past they didn't put in dual currency either, a staple of blood sucking F2P games, so pardon me if I don't share your bountiful, misplaced optimism. And even if you're right, the game is asking for sixty bucks and is pimping limited editions, MTs can still fuck off because they're unfettered greed.

And if this was an MMO, that would mean something. It isn't. It's a single player game with microtransactions
Uh, Injustice 2 has dual currencies (If not four, but iirc 3 are non-MT)?

Also, plenty of non-MMO games have dailies. Even single-player shit like Binding of Isaac and Deus Ex.

Also Also, thanks for bringing up Easy Fatalities, because they only help prove my point. The fatality inputs in MKX were no more complicated than any other MK game, the Easys were included as a "if you don't feel like learning the fatality inputs you can buy some of these instead". You can even earn like 10-20 of them for free from the Krypt.

Also also also, if you're going to hate a fighting game based on it having a free-for-preorders character, then enjoy playing Street Fighter V, King of Fighters 14, and literally nothing else, because unfortunate though it may be that's basically standard practice now, but thank god that nearly every recent fighting game (Streets V being the one exception, go figure!) has been solid enough to be worth $60.

Also once again, if the game's systems are in no way skewed to try to get you to buy currency, how is it "making the game less fun"? The game is -exactly the fucking same-, you just have the -option- to spend extra money to get extra edge.

If just the notion that you could maybe decide to drop $5 on a box of epik loot is testing your will -that much-, to the point that the game is actively unfun to play, you may wish to consider that the problem may come from somewhere inward, rather than outward as you seem so convinced.

And finally, to address your claim that MTs are "unfettered greed", you seem to have a total lack of understanding of the economic side of this industry. Is it unfortunate that AAA devs elect to charge for what are essentially cheat codes? Sure. But on the same note, back in the era of cheat codes, you could make an AAA game on less than $500k and still sell it for $60 a pop. Nowadays, -especially- in the case of these big open world sandbox type games, your budget can run a minimum of $100 million, -plus- marketing. Considering that they need to not only make back the money they spent on the game, but -also- make the profit necessary to fund the next game, something had to give at some point.

Consider that AAA releases have been $60 for something like the past 10+ years. If your game sells 3 million copies, that's $180 million, minus distributor cuts (in this case, let's use Steam's 30% cut as an assumed cost), which leaves you with around $126 million, when you need to make -at least- $200 mil to stay afloat. Even if you add in a $30 season pass and assume literally everyone buys it you -still- only have $189 mil. And let's not even forget that $200 mil is the absolute bear minimum. A big AAA dev can afford to have that happen from time to time, but numbers that low would be unsustainable in the long term due to all of the other costs that the company will have. So devs had a choice. Either they raise the price of their games, or they add an alternative method to make extra income, and WB chose the latter. They decided to add microtransactions so that they could make up that needed cash gap, and with luck they won't have compromised the balance of the game to do so, and it's perfectly well-placed optimism to think they won't fuck it up considering that they haven't done so with any of their past games that had MTs so far.
I didn't not know that. Another reason they can fuck off. I'm sorry but I don't accept "they're not as bad as they could be" to be an excuse for MTs

And how many of them have MTs?

They weren't any harder. Struggling to care. As I've said before, you could be 100% right about the MTs being lenient and I wouldn't give a damn. But

If you're trying to prove a point you're doing a shit job. But thanks for pointing out how utterly infested with cancer fighting games are.

If, if, that's a big fucking if. If WB was shameless enough to put Arkham Knight back up when it was still broken, I'm not feeling that confident. Particularly considering these BS practices have a tendency to be a downward spiral, with publishers getting worse and worse, and as mentioned, they don't have my trust. Oh the choice argument again. If devs care so much about choice, they can out in cheat codes. But no, that sweet sweet green is more important.

Yeah kinda. Maybe you don't care, but a lot of people do. It's an immersion breaking cash grab that makes me feel like a cow the publishers are trying to milk. They can fuck off, and you can kindly stop giving me shit for not wanting publishers to nickel and dime me. I really don't get why me not wanting that offends so many people.

Oh those poor poor AAA publishers. They're so poor, making millions and millions of dollars, they need more to afford a third yacht. And now a random person who probably has zero extra erience in economics is going to lecture me about economics. Thanks but no thanks. I notice plenty of AAA games that manage to make money without MTs, and I doubt it's because their devs found the Infinity Gauntlet. Publishers don't need MTs. They want them. As for me? I really don't fucking care. It's not my job to care about their bottom line, and it's not your job either. If they're so bloated they need this cash to stay afloat (citation fucking needed) then maybe they should learn how to spend money like reasonable adults. Oh, and I can't help but notice Shadow of Mordor had no MTs and aparently made enough money. Explain that. Next I suppose you'll be defending everything Activison did with Modern Warfare 4 Remastered.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Vendor-Lazarus said:
Shitty practices remain shitty and I could take more complainers seriously if games like these stopped being profitable.
"Ooh..aah..so bad!" -Yes, yes it is.

"I would cancel pre-order but..excuse."
"I cancelled pre-order, will buy after launch."
"Won't buy until price has dropped."
"Will only buy used."

...You are still giving them money, you know?

Sigh!
Yeah, this purchase has been downgraded to after two price drops and a Steam summer sale for me, and it looks like other people here are different into the same. Hate to rain on your "gamers are stupid" parade.
 

Vendor-Lazarus

Censored by Mods. PM for Taboos
Mar 1, 2009
1,201
0
0
erttheking said:
Vendor-Lazarus said:
Shitty practices remain shitty and I could take more complainers seriously if games like these stopped being profitable.
"Ooh..aah..so bad!" -Yes, yes it is.

"I would cancel pre-order but..excuse."
"I cancelled pre-order, will buy after launch."
"Won't buy until price has dropped."
"Will only buy used."

...You are still giving them money, you know?

Sigh!
Yeah, this purchase has been downgraded to after two price drops and a Steam summer sale for me, and it looks like other people here are different into the same. Hate to rain on your "gamers are stupid" parade.
I don't see how this is raining on my parade. It's more like adding rain to it..?
Also, I never said that us gamers are stupid. I can see how it implies that, but I think it's more to do with naivete and being weak-willed. Being weak-willed isn't meant to be derogatory either.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Vendor-Lazarus said:
erttheking said:
Vendor-Lazarus said:
Shitty practices remain shitty and I could take more complainers seriously if games like these stopped being profitable.
"Ooh..aah..so bad!" -Yes, yes it is.

"I would cancel pre-order but..excuse."
"I cancelled pre-order, will buy after launch."
"Won't buy until price has dropped."
"Will only buy used."

...You are still giving them money, you know?

Sigh!
Yeah, this purchase has been downgraded to after two price drops and a Steam summer sale for me, and it looks like other people here are different into the same. Hate to rain on your "gamers are stupid" parade.
I don't see how this is raining on my parade. It's more like adding rain to it..?
Also, I never said that us gamers are stupid. I can see how it implies that, but I think it's more to do with naivete and being weak-willed. Being weak-willed isn't meant to be derogatory either.
Publishers have a way of only looking at the big sales right after it comes out. A week after. That's what they boast about. That's what reinforces them. Wait a few years for sales and price drops, and you're not reinforcing their shitty behaviors. That's the important thing, and where it counts.

She sorry about the stupid thing. I've been getting a lot of people jumping on my back in this thread.
 

Vendor-Lazarus

Censored by Mods. PM for Taboos
Mar 1, 2009
1,201
0
0
erttheking said:
Vendor-Lazarus said:
erttheking said:
Vendor-Lazarus said:
Shitty practices remain shitty and I could take more complainers seriously if games like these stopped being profitable.
"Ooh..aah..so bad!" -Yes, yes it is.

"I would cancel pre-order but..excuse."
"I cancelled pre-order, will buy after launch."
"Won't buy until price has dropped."
"Will only buy used."

...You are still giving them money, you know?

Sigh!
Yeah, this purchase has been downgraded to after two price drops and a Steam summer sale for me, and it looks like other people here are different into the same. Hate to rain on your "gamers are stupid" parade.
I don't see how this is raining on my parade. It's more like adding rain to it..?
Also, I never said that us gamers are stupid. I can see how it implies that, but I think it's more to do with naivete and being weak-willed. Being weak-willed isn't meant to be derogatory either.
Publishers have a way of only looking at the big sales right after it comes out. A week after. That's what they boast about. That's what reinforces them. Wait a few years for sales and price drops, and you're not reinforcing their shitty behaviors. That's the important thing, and where it counts.

She sorry about the stupid thing. I've been getting a lot of people jumping on my back in this thread.
Ah, I see what you meant now. Though you are still giving them money, but if you really want that game I suppose that's the best (legal) solution.

No problem. Heat of the moment and swift retraction. No worries.
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
Xorph said:
erttheking said:
Tell me why I should give them the benefit of the doubt. I don't trust them. They burned my trust s long time ago by being a typical AAA publisher. That's my evidence that they'll try to fuck me. It's what they do. It's more than the nothing suggesting they won't try to fuck me. They're bringing in daily quests to get resources, games with microtransactions that do that have a bad history of being stingy with in game money,because they're pushing microtransactions

Where's the choice to play the game without it? Where's the choice to buy the microtransaction free version? For all your talk about player choice, there seems to little meaningful choices
Please, elaborate on how exactly WB burned your trust by being a "typical AAA publisher" because the only bad thing on their track record that comes to mind is bungling Arkham Knight PC and it seems like a pretty big jump in logic to go "this company really fucked up that one PC port, spent months trying to fix it and even offered full refunds, they're just the WORST"

Also, the choice to play the game without MTs is right there. You just... play the game without using the MTs? Unless they intentionally skew the game to push for MTs, which again, we have -evidence suggesting they won't because they haven't with their MTs in the past-, it doesn't make a lick of sense to say "why can't I play an MT-free version" because said version would be completely identical sans the ability to spend $ to speed shit up.

Also, daily quests have been around -long- before F2P mobile shit picked them up, they date all the way back to World of Warcraft, if not earlier, as a means to get you to keep playing the game every day. The intent is to keep player count higher over time by giving everyone incentive to constantly boot the game up, it has nothing to do with "pushing MTs".
Was there not some shit about paid deals with youtubers, where they could only get review copies if they agreed to only be positive about Shadow of Mordor?

Funnily I got Arkham Knight free with a gpu. That was absolutely not the right game to show off my new hardware with...

Fully OT: Consider me soured. I don't like the sound of this at all. Somebody poke me when I can get this game for a fiver, 'cause I ain't rewarding this stuff with anything close to an RRP purchase.
 

InflatableHippo

New member
Feb 13, 2016
61
0
0
Country
usa
Welcome to the slippery slope. Where where the gambling and "pay to skip" from mobile/phone games have spread to the console/PCs. Could have been avoided if the majority of players boycotted the practice at inception, but its to late now.
 

Xorph

New member
Aug 24, 2010
295
0
0
erttheking said:
I didn't not know that. Another reason they can fuck off. I'm sorry but I don't accept "they're not as bad as they could be" to be an excuse for MTs

And how many of them have MTs?

They weren't any harder. Struggling to care. As I've said before, you could be 100% right about the MTs being lenient and I wouldn't give a damn. But

If you're trying to prove a point you're doing a shit job. But thanks for pointing out how utterly infested with cancer fighting games are.

If, if, that's a big fucking if. If WB was shameless enough to put Arkham Knight back up when it was still broken, I'm not feeling that confident. Particularly considering these BS practices have a tendency to be a downward spiral, with publishers getting worse and worse, and as mentioned, they don't have my trust. Oh the choice argument again. If devs care so much about choice, they can out in cheat codes. But no, that sweet sweet green is more important.

Yeah kinda. Maybe you don't care, but a lot of people do. It's an immersion breaking cash grab that makes me feel like a cow the publishers are trying to milk. They can fuck off, and you can kindly stop giving me shit for not wanting publishers to nickel and dime me. I really don't get why me not wanting that offends so many people.

Oh those poor poor AAA publishers. They're so poor, making millions and millions of dollars, they need more to afford a third yacht. And now a random person who probably has zero extra erience in economics is going to lecture me about economics. Thanks but no thanks. I notice plenty of AAA games that manage to make money without MTs, and I doubt it's because their devs found the Infinity Gauntlet. Publishers don't need MTs. They want them. As for me? I really don't fucking care. It's not my job to care about their bottom line, and it's not your job either. If they're so bloated they need this cash to stay afloat (citation fucking needed) then maybe they should learn how to spend money like reasonable adults. Oh, and I can't help but notice Shadow of Mordor had no MTs and aparently made enough money. Explain that. Next I suppose you'll be defending everything Activison did with Modern Warfare 4 Remastered.
So basically what I read here was that you're going to look at any point against your case and say "well I don't accept that as an argument" or "I don't care lol" and continue to just be filled with utter hate and contempt for WB, yeah?

Also, it's not the notion that you don't want MTs that's offending anyone (if anything I'd even find it a stretch to say anyone is offended, just bringing in opposing viewpoints/arguments), it's the fact that you act like MTs being in a game is like the coming of the Antichrist and completely ignore any of the people trying to get you to calm down and realize it isn't the end of the world.

(Also the point with the fighting game thing was that it's a bit unfair to get mad specifically at WB for that. Rather, you should be mad at the entire fighting game industry)
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Xorph said:
I pointed out a large number of problems I had with WB, and you did a very poor job of arguing against them. Easy fatalities was the closest you got, ignoring the fact that I've already pointed out that even if MTs aren't skewed to pressure you into using them, I still hate them. Nor was your argument about their pre-order characters. Everyone else does it with fighting games? They all have my contempt too. I don't accept "well everyone else does it too" as a defense. I'm not grading on a curve.

I treat it as the coming of the anti-christ. Not really.

erttheking said:
And fuck off. Fuck off, fuck off, fuck right the hell off. You just got downgraded to me waiting for two price drops and a Steam Summer sale before I buy this.
That's...pretty much on par with everyone else. I'm just kind of pissed because people just couldn't let that statement stand and had to challenge it. Then keep challenging my counter arguments. And kept going from there. Needless to say, I'm in a bit of a bad mood, particularly after I've written reply after reply about people defending this stuff, something I see as a blight on the industry and overall bad for consumers.

Done.
 

StatusNil

New member
Oct 5, 2014
534
0
0
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
Was there not some shit about paid deals with youtubers, where they could only get review copies if they agreed to only be positive about Shadow of Mordor?
Indeed there was, TotalBiscuit blew the whistle on that. WB claimed they were shocked the marketing company they contracted to promote the game would do something like that without their knowledge...
 

Xorph

New member
Aug 24, 2010
295
0
0
erttheking said:
and you did a very poor job of arguing against them.

I don't accept "well everyone else does it too" as a defense.

I treat it as the coming of the anti-christ. Not really.
erttheking said:
And fuck off. Fuck off, fuck off, fuck right the hell off. You just got downgraded to me waiting for two price drops and a Steam Summer sale before I buy this.
That's...pretty much on par with everyone else. I'm just kind of pissed because people just couldn't let that statement stand and had to challenge it. Then keep challenging my counter arguments. And kept going from there. Needless to say, I'm in a bit of a bad mood, particularly after I've written reply after reply about people defending this stuff, something I see as a blight on the industry and overall bad for consumers.
Just an fyi, I broke up beginning to make it more clear what I'm responding to, not to try to take stuff out of context since I know people pull that shit in forum arguments all the time.

First off, that's your opinion, which it will remain unless we go full stupid and ask the rest of the forum what they think about our scuffle.

Second, thanks for proving my point that you'll selectively ignore counterarguments because you "don't accept" them without any counterargument of your own to back it up.

Third, I'm not disputing that your opinion is matching others, they're -also- acting like this is some massive transgression of gamer rights. It may be unfortunate that MTs exist, but the whole point of my (and possibly Darth's but I don't wanna speak for them) argument has been that them existing is no need to go "SHIT GAME NO BUY UNTIL IT $5".

Four, you're mad that you posted an excessively angry opinion on a forum, and that people then decided to contest your opinion and have a debate, as is wont to happen on internet forums? Why are you on a forum, if not to post your opinions alongside others' and have excessively long arguments about whose are right and whose aren't?
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
StatusNil said:
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
Was there not some shit about paid deals with youtubers, where they could only get review copies if they agreed to only be positive about Shadow of Mordor?
Indeed there was, TotalBiscuit blew the whistle on that. WB claimed they were shocked the marketing company they contracted to promote the game would do something like that without their knowledge...
Thanks. I didn't think I had imagined that.

Xorph said:
Third, I'm not disputing that your opinion is matching others, they're -also- acting like this is some massive transgression of gamer rights. It may be unfortunate that MTs exist, but the whole point of my (and possibly Darth's but I don't wanna speak for them) argument has been that them existing is no need to go "SHIT GAME NO BUY UNTIL IT $5".
Do you believe it's unreasonable to look at what's proposed and believe it's devalued the game? We're all constantly deciding what any given game is worth to us, irrespective of RRP, are we not? What's the problem with looking at this and deciding to take a pass? Or is it just the tone?
 

Xorph

New member
Aug 24, 2010
295
0
0
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
Do you believe it's unreasonable to look at what's proposed and believe it's devalued the game? We're all constantly deciding what any given game is worth to us, irrespective of RRP, are we not? What's the problem with looking at this and deciding to take a pass? Or is it just the tone?
It's pretty much just the tone, yeah. Also help me out, what's RRP?
 

immortalfrieza

Elite Member
Legacy
May 12, 2011
2,336
270
88
Country
USA
erttheking said:
Publishers have a way of only looking at the big sales right after it comes out. A week after. That's what they boast about. That's what reinforces them. Wait a few years for sales and price drops, and you're not reinforcing their shitty behaviors. That's the important thing, and where it counts.
If by "where it counts" you mean where it does precisely jack you're right. For every 1 person smart enough and who cares enough to boycott anything there's a thousand more idiots out there that either don't know or don't care that they're being blatantly screwed over that will buy it anyway, and this is in no way limited to video games. It's the latter people that these companies are catering to and seeking to exploit with these awful business practices, it's why these practices came into being, why they still exist, and will continue for likely as long as corporations exist. People who are intelligent and care are always massively outnumbered by those who don't.
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
Xorph said:
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
Do you believe it's unreasonable to look at what's proposed and believe it's devalued the game? We're all constantly deciding what any given game is worth to us, irrespective of RRP, are we not? What's the problem with looking at this and deciding to take a pass? Or is it just the tone?
It's pretty much just the tone, yeah. Also help me out, what's RRP?
Recommended Retail Price.