I strongly believe in the concepts of Mercy, Forgiveness, and Redemption. Then again, I also firmly believe in justice, so make of that what you will.
imburke said:either way he buggered a 13 year old girl and got away with it, this being said, ive seen the documentary with her accounts and she was more than willing, not that that makes it ok, cause it isnt, but if her mom was dragging her around know perverts (polanski was big into women) she was accepting that risk, the woman says not to blamer her mother but its hard not to when the woman basically dragged her daughter into this place like a toy with a vagina.and what girl wouldnt be willing to be with a famous person at that age. how many girls would give it up pr pete wense from fall out boy, or that douche from twilight? anyway.. is he guilty, yes, should he be paying for a crime that no one cares about? no. the judge shouldnt have let him leave, his lawyers said he was in the middle of shooting a movie, so he let him, go, bad call on the judge.
I disagree strongly on both those points.Fredrick2003 said:Everybody would have sex with 13 year old girls if they could.
Also Chinatown sucked.
Well said. I'm sure many of the priests found to/convicted of molesting children did tons of good things for their communities/parishes when they weren't molesting their victims. Guess what? THEY STILL MOLESTED SOMEONE so it really doesn't matter how many good deeds they did nor should it. You can't make up for sexually assaulting a child with spiritually counseling numerous communities and running countless bake sales, festivals, fish dinners, soup kitchens etc and you sure as hell cant make up for it by making 10 movies since 1997 of questionable quality.Cliff_m85 said:I'm going to be controversial, so hold onto your hats.
If you stick your penis into a little kid, you deserve jail time.
Except for you. This would solve a lot of the world's problems in any case.odubya23 said:There is no innocence, only varying degrees of guilt. I say hang everyone, for any reason.
Hmmm....maybe if he wasn't a Roman Polanski and rather a Roman Catholic Priest?SAVEpointGL1TCH said:Well said. I'm sure many of the priests found to/convicted of molesting children did tons of good things for their communities/parishes when they weren't molesting their victims. Guess what? THEY STILL MOLESTED SOMEONE so it really doesn't matter how many good deeds they did nor should it. You can't make up for sexually assaulting a child with spiritually counseling numerous communities and running countless bake sales, festivals, fish dinners, soup kitchens etc and you sure as hell cant make up for it by making 10 movies since 1997 of questionable quality.Cliff_m85 said:I'm going to be controversial, so hold onto your hats.
If you stick your penis into a little kid, you deserve jail time.
I know man *rolls eyes*. It's even closer to me because assholes are saying "The girl forgave him". Fuck no, she just doesn't want to relive it all over again. She doesn't want reporters trying to get her to recall what happened or see her face on tv or be known as "the rape victim". It's common sense and people are just fucking insane.MaxTheReaper said:Dude, no.Cliff_m85 said:I'm going to be controversial, so hold onto your hats.
If you stick your penis into a little kid, you deserve jail time.
Didn't you read?
He's made movies.
This totally excuses him.
Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go fuck some kids and write some books.
That just about balances the scales, right?
Maybe help some little old ladies across the street to make sure my karma matches up perfectly with my anti-karma.
True, but it doesn't mean it wasn't wrong or that it didn't have a bad effect on her live - for example, I've heard most rape victims never report what happened - doesn't mean that the victims wheren't badly effected, nor does it mean the bastard who did it should be forgiven. It does mean that the victim doesn't want to deal with what happened, and/or is afraid of not being believed or doesn't want to face the courts.HG131 said:Seriously, I believe he should be let go. There should be a law that if the "victim" forgives their "attacker" then they should be let go. He didn't ruin her life, the courts are now, however. She wants it forgotten. Forget it.
Are you kidding me?The_root_of_all_evil said:The outpouring around Michael Jackson and O.J. reached similar levels of hysteria on both sides, but my main point of puzzlement in this case is around the Polish.
On the day he was arrested the headlines in Reuters read:
1) Anger in France and Poland over Polanski arrest
2) Poland okays forcible castration for paedophiles.
One wonders why Poland is so angry, and whether Roman got off lightly?