Uh, I've done it. Been out cold for an unspecified amount of time (because really, I only know exactly what time I went to bed, not what time I got out of bed again, and I know what time I came round), with a pretty impressive set of injuries from a short (3ft) fall. Nobody even knew concussion was an issue til about ten days later.Nickompoop said:OP: That you can wake up from being unconscious due to a whack on the head for an hour and be totally fine. If you're hit on the head and pass out, that means you got a horrbily bad concussion. If you don't wake up within 10-15 seconds (I believe) you get permanent brain damage.OrenjiJusu said:that all british people are incredibly upper class and only drink tea and eat scones.
And I see it in stories all the time! Come on, people, do some research.
Feel the same there, Lucky for me I've got friends that I can talk to about that.zephae said:Now, I can't engage in my favorite topic, politics, because people either take it way too seriously, roll their eyes at you as though the very idea of talking about what our government or society should work towards is not an acceptable topic of discussion, or get offended because you try to probe their opinions and treat topics with significant depth. The contempt and apathy that people show for discussing public policy never ceases to amaze and infuriate me.
Did you intentionally spell woman like that?00slash00 said:that feminism is about female dominance, not gender equality
that a man who transitions to a womin, isnt a real womin (i use this as an example but obviously this goes for a womin who transitions into a man, as well)
They tested that on Mythbusters, and they learnt that even at rest doing absolutely nothing, the brain is between 15-20% activeMimsofthedawg said:What I hate is that there are actual, scientific articles who either try to substatiate the claim of 10% of our brains being used or use that "fact" in some part of their research. I've seen topics ranging from psychology to health and exercise fitness that use this "fact" to explain why certain tasks are good for you or bad for you (if you do THIS you'll be capable of using 12% of your brain, which is like doubling the time you typically study!). Yea, no. we use more like 98-99% of our brain. Even when we're sleeping, our brain is incredibly active - arguably more so than when we're awake, as it has to process EVERYTHING that occurred the day before and heal itself.synobal said:What is the most common misconceptions that drive you crazy? Mine has to be the 'humans only use 10% of their brain.' It drives me crazy when I see it in TV shows, Movies, Books or Video Games to justify anything. That sort of laziness in writing just isn't acceptable for me, as a writer or story teller. I mean what's the point of coming up with something awesome for the 'plot' and then use something to lazy to justify it.
So what misconceptions drive you to insane frenzies of rage?
I think the myth came from a real fact, though. That fact is higher brain function comes from roughly ten percent of our brains. But the idea that at any one time our brain is essentially "off" is completely false.
If people believe in somethings existence, they (logically) must also personally believe that the evidence is substantial enough to warrant that belief. A believer interprets that same evidence differently from a non believer. Just like people's bodies are naturally different, so are our brains. So it's actually logical that our different brains interpret evidence differently and come up with different morals and beliefs. So here's a tip for you: No one believes in something without enough evidence, empirical or otherwise. Empirical evidence is no more "true" or "factual" than any other kind and the value of evidence is in the eye of the beholder.EverythingIncredible said:If you have no real evidence to support something existing, then you shouldn't believe it exists in the first place.UrKnightErrant said:That some people feel it's their place to dictate to others what it's OK for them to believe and what it's not.EverythingIncredible said:My personal biggest beef is that everyone thinks it is okay to believe that something exists without any empirical evidence to support it.
Here's a tip: It's not.
Here's a tip: It's not.
How is that illogical?
Actually, no. For example, I just thought, "Winnebago cream cheese olive spike marlin cancer pig warship." Statistically speaking, the odds that anyone has thought that before are astronomical.H31neken said:Every thought you've ever had, someone has had before you. Every. Single. One.