Yes in a world of Undead, Elves, Dwarves, Gnomes, Goblins, Werewolves, Demons, Space Goats, Orcs, Trolls, Cow People, and now Pandas. One might question how humans are suppose to fit into all this xDDarkmantle said:""I don't really get how anthropomorphic pandas are going to fit into the whole World of Warcraft canon,""
two things.
A. they already are canon :/ they were in the wc3 expansion.
b. hey, we have anthropomorphic wolves and cows, I don't see an issue really.
It was never meant to be a joke.Andy Chalk said:I actually had no idea that the Pandaren appeared in the Warcraft 3 expansion, but the fact that the race originated as an April Fool's joke speaks volumes.
And hey, if the fans like it, that's great, but even so I don't think anyone can argue that it's not cartoonishly goofy. Maybe I'm too hung up on the early lore but I think I prefer my Warcraft set in a "serious" fantasy realm.
They were in WC3 only as a joke, never as an actual part of the warcraft world. The only reason we're seeing them now is because a ridiculous amount of WoW players have been crying to Blizzard about how much they want to play a panda through the years.Darkmantle said:A. they already are canon :/ they were in the wc3 expansion.
More things to do outside of raiding can only be a good thing.tehroc said:I don't care about the pandas, its the lolpokemons and the continuation of worn out game systems (Dikumud) that bother me.
Patience grasshopper. Pass subscribers are guaranteed access, but it's a HUGE amount of people and letting them all in at once is a BAD idea.Loop Stricken said:More things to do outside of raiding can only be a good thing.tehroc said:I don't care about the pandas, its the lolpokemons and the continuation of worn out game systems (Dikumud) that bother me.
Anyways, where's my beta invite, Blizzard?I made my account pretty much as soon as WoW launched, I took the annual pass during Blizzcon... I want to mess about with pandas, damn it.
I have to agree with you here: first off, it's only a small segment of fans who have been clamoring for Pandaren from the beginning; secondly, adding an entirely comical race really does deeply detract from the monumentally epic feel that the game previously had (for me at least).Andy Chalk said:And hey, if the fans like it, that's great, but even so I don't think anyone can argue that it's not cartoonishly goofy. Maybe I'm too hung up on the early lore but I think I prefer my Warcraft set in a "serious" fantasy realm.
Andy Chalk said:I actually had no idea that the Pandaren appeared in the Warcraft 3 expansion, but the fact that the race originated as an April Fool's joke speaks volumes.
And hey, if the fans like it, that's great, but even so I don't think anyone can argue that it's not cartoonishly goofy. Maybe I'm too hung up on the early lore but I think I prefer my Warcraft set in a "serious" fantasy realm.
Straight from the press event.Blizzard said:We have a lot of people wondering about "Pandarens, really? They are so cuddly!", almost innately silly. Pandarens are an idea that we have been thinking about for many, many years, something like twelve years. Initially they were drawn by Sam Didier, who loves these characters. We hooked a few of these characters into the Frozen Throne in Warcraft III and have always been in love with the idea. We got to debut Pandaren as an April Fool's joke many years ago and people feel that it is innately comedic based on that. No, April Fools was just a fun opportunity to show the idea. Many of you may not know that Pandaren were in serious consideration for the Alliance race in Burning Crusade, that is how serious we are about the idea. We have always loved Pandaren, we have always wanted to put them in the game, and for a number of reasons now is the time. It is not a throwaway idea in any way. In many ways they are the perfect race to include right now, as things start to ramp up. As the factional hate and societal rage rises to sweep the world up into war once again, the Pandaren will distinguish themselves on both sides and hedge the bet that against total calamity. They have a very distinct role to play, both culturally and factionally, so it is perfect that they dropped at this time.
Actually, champ, the issue is that I lost interest in the Warcraft mythos somewhere around the end of Warcraft 2.DVS BSTrD said:Work on Gaming website
Doesn't understand how a pre-existing in-game race will fit into game's canon just because NOW they are playable.
That is true, but it's because the original design on those blades looked a bit like swastikas, so they changed it.Denamic said:IIRC, there was a face of a panda in some scorch marks and on Illidan's glaives among other things.
So you want humans/dwarves/elves vs orcs/goblins/ogres. I'm quivering with excitement over this unique and exciting concept. I understand if you dislike change, I really do, but you gotta give it credit for being unique. That's pretty much all Warcraft has left since it's been sifted through an MMO for the last decadeAndy Chalk said:Maybe I'm too hung up on the early lore but I think I prefer my Warcraft set in a "serious" fantasy realm.
I have no problem with change, I just don't see Kung Fu Panda as a direction I'd be interested in going. No skin off my ass either way, I don't play WoW, it just seems a little out of place.Fr said:anc[is]I'm quivering with excitement over this unique and exciting concept.
Except Chen Stormstout is a very serious character, who helps Rexxar do serious shit in WC3, which by the way, pre-dates Kung Fu Panda.Andy Chalk said:Okay, so the anthropomorphic Chinese pandas introduced as a non-playable race on April Fool's Day is actually a totally serious and pre-existing. Right. This is not an argument I'm going to have.
Actually, champ, the issue is that I lost interest in the Warcraft mythos somewhere around the end of Warcraft 2.DVS BSTrD said:Work on Gaming website
Doesn't understand how a pre-existing in-game race will fit into game's canon just because NOW they are playable.
Monks would be too bursty in PvP if they didn't have auto attack, is the reason/excuse for this.remmus said:meh the little spark of interest I had for getting back into WoW was kinda snuffed out with the monk changes, first I heard of the Monk I applauded Blizzards attempt of making a class with a more active combat style, forcing a player to actually be in the fight, rather then lean back, sip coffee and hit a few number keys like WoW combat is otherwise (at least in PvE)
And now there like "nope, just as basic as the rest", yeah i know I´m getting haters on my rear saying this, but GW2 is looking mighty fine still.
Is it then not possible to have some a little less jaded posting the updates? It'd stop people moaning about the tone at least.Andy Chalk said:Actually, champ, the issue is that I lost interest in the Warcraft mythos somewhere around the end of Warcraft 2.
I think you might be blindsided with their cuddlyness. While I dont know the Pandaren lore in extreme detail, I'm pretty sure it doesnt involve watching my little pony and eating strawberriesAndy Chalk said:I actually had no idea that the Pandaren appeared in the Warcraft 3 expansion, but the fact that the race originated as an April Fool's joke speaks volumes.
And hey, if the fans like it, that's great, but even so I don't think anyone can argue that it's not cartoonishly goofy. Maybe I'm too hung up on the early lore but I think I prefer my Warcraft set in a "serious" fantasy realm.