It's hard not to, when the trailers are showing off kung fu pandas completely straight-faced.jurnag12 said:I'm just annoyed that all that people try to focus on seems to be that Pandaren were originally an April's Fools joke.
It's hard not to, when the trailers are showing off kung fu pandas completely straight-faced.jurnag12 said:I'm just annoyed that all that people try to focus on seems to be that Pandaren were originally an April's Fools joke.
You're right. I was thinking of the Digital Deluxe edition for some reason. Brainfart.Soods said:Digital version = 34,99? = 35?excalipoor said:The digital version is cheaper too. Why would anyone not buy that instead of the physical copy? Other than to show off the box I guess.
I can have MoP delivered to my doorstep from a retailer for only 28,40?.
Despite the Pandaren existing as a concept for years before that movie was even released. I was doubtful about Mists of Pandaria myself but I have to give Blizzard credit, it works. They've put a hell of a lot of work into this expansion. The new zones are absolutely stunning and hugely detailed, the quests are fun and the dungeons have mechanics beyond tanking and spanking. I've been converted.Pyrian said:It's hard not to, when the trailers are showing off kung fu pandas completely straight-faced.jurnag12 said:I'm just annoyed that all that people try to focus on seems to be that Pandaren were originally an April's Fools joke.
Hell, people go on about 'WoW killers', WoW will kill itself eventually.Fappy said:The cracks are growing larger. The beast doesn't have much longer to live by my calculations.
I've felt that way since way back when Warhammer Online was coming out. You can only stuff so much shit into an old game before it implodes like the big Yellow energy absorption guy from early on in the Buu saga who Goku beat by making him absorb too much energy... wait... where was I going with this?Daystar Clarion said:Hell, people go on about 'WoW killers', WoW will kill itself eventually.Fappy said:The cracks are growing larger. The beast doesn't have much longer to live by my calculations.
When I say die out I really mean lose it's monopoly. WoW has one of the biggest followings in the industry's history, so of course there will always be a niche for it. I wouldn't doubt Blizzard will likely keep the servers alive for another 15 or 20 years if enough people are still playing. DII servers are still up.Capitano Segnaposto said:Then explain Everquest. It is bloated and yet it still has a devoted following. WoW will continue to decline, but I highly doubt it will "die out". It will go the way of Ultima Online or Everquest (the first one, not the second).Fappy said:I've felt that way since way back when Warhammer Online was coming out. You can only stuff so much shit into an old game before it implodes like the big Yellow energy absorption guy from early on in the Buu saga who Goku beat by making him absorb too much energy... wait... where was I going with this?Daystar Clarion said:Hell, people go on about 'WoW killers', WoW will kill itself eventually.Fappy said:The cracks are growing larger. The beast doesn't have much longer to live by my calculations.
Captcha: how about that?
I think the problem with WoW is more like the reverse. Instead of using their huge name, fame and financial power to broaden and deepen the game, and in doing so advance the entire genre, they're becoming narrower and narrower in focus - drowning the levelling experience in gimmicky minigames and sucking the life out of anything that isn't the most recent 5 levels and the dead horse gear grind of the endgame.Fappy said:I've felt that way since way back when Warhammer Online was coming out. You can only stuff so much shit into an old game before it implodes like the big Yellow energy absorption guy from early on in the Buu saga who Goku beat by making him absorb too much energy... wait... where was I going with this?
I was going with the whole abundance of expansions and high level cap angle. A lot of people have left the game for the reasons you listed above, but it is hard for them to replenish their numbers because newcomers are intimidated by what appears to be an incredibly large and difficult game to "catch up" in.Sixcess said:I think the problem with WoW is more like the reverse. Instead of using their huge name, fame and financial power to broaden and deepen the game, and in doing so advance the entire genre, they're becoming narrower and narrower in focus - drowning the levelling experience in gimmicky minigames and sucking the life out of anything that isn't the most recent 5 levels and the dead horse gear grind of the endgame.Fappy said:I've felt that way since way back when Warhammer Online was coming out. You can only stuff so much shit into an old game before it implodes like the big Yellow energy absorption guy from early on in the Buu saga who Goku beat by making him absorb too much energy... wait... where was I going with this?
With all thedumbing downstreamlining of the game these past few years it feels like there's less to WoW than there used to be, not more.
True.Fappy said:I was going with the whole abundance of expansions and high level cap angle. A lot of people have left the game for the reasons you listed above, but it is hard for them to replenish their numbers because newcomers are intimidated by what appears to be an incredibly large and difficult game to "catch up" in.