Modern Warfare 3 PC Goes Free for a Weekend

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,226
0
0
I think everyone that would of bought it, has bought it by now, at the full release price of it anyway.

If only they actually bothered to lower the price, people might be more forthcoming.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
I don't know what it is that disappoints me so much about MW3.

The damage to health ratio is so unbalanced, every weapon kills in 2-3 shots and fires so fast, hitscan, in close quarters. Confrontations are just too fugging fast.

There is just so little to the gameplay. How EVERYONE has 100hp, and more than that they RELIABLY have 100hp thanks to the oh-so-quick health recharge makes every encounter almost identical. There is no trade off between mobility and health or other special attributes as in other games.

See, the health in Team Fortress 2 may be more "primitive" with health packs and medic healing, but it adds another layer to the gameplay and strategy. Like how you have to trade off standing your ground or going to find health, you still usually have enough health with even 60% gone to stand a fighting chance in combat. There is the strategy in targeting those you reckon have the lowest health, also based on their very distinctive classes.

You have such huge difference in roles and mobility of classes. Demo and Soldier are slow but can make a few huge jumps with rocket or sticky-bomb jumps at cost of health. Scout is very fast and can make very long jumps very often. Pyro is quite fast but has anti-mobility of the air-blast (most of the time), Heavy is slow as hell but a real tank, huge health and such a deadly gun. Engineer, sniper and spy all have pretty average speed but such unique roles with TOTALLY different playstyles.

Thing is, I always feel like I am a sniper in CoD. I might have a relatively slow firing single-hit-kill sniper rifle, or I might have one that is full auto and kills in a few bullets. You have to really go shotgun or sniper to have really distinct gameplay with hipfiring, but again the damage:health ratio is so high and you move so slow that encounters are just over in a flash of spraying bullets at each other. Over and over it is jog-jog-jog Aim-down-sights + shoot.

They'll never do the grenades right. Overpowered as single shot, then they nerf them to be weak yet you still have only 2-3 rounds slow-firing = worthless. Grenades are weak in TF2 and Tribes, but you can launch a ton of them!

And then there is the general direction-less-ness of the gameplay in CoD. So much camping. Such predictable objectives. I you've played one match you've played them all. They all just blur together like Groundhog day.
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
I'm only in it for the
*world gasps*
single player, so I won't be bothering with this. I'll just pick up the console version for $5 used in a year or so.
 

Bobic

New member
Nov 10, 2009
1,532
0
0
Treblaine said:
This game only stands a serious chance on PC if it goes Free-to-play or a VERY low starting price.
Just out of curiosity, but what do you mean by 'stands a chance'. A chance to do what? It's still in the steam top sellers list and has been since launch. It seems to me that it's succeeded quite considerably already.

Not that I'm gonna bother buying it 'til I see it for less than a tenner. But whatever.
 

Absolutionis

New member
Sep 18, 2008
420
0
0
Rather than having a 'free weekend' for the PC, stop charging an extra $10 for no reason. PC Games are commonly $49.99; let's keep it there.
 

Rednog

New member
Nov 3, 2008
3,567
0
0
There really is no point to buy the PC version of this game anymore, DLC delayed horrendously, elite service canned, match making system is worse than MW2's matchmaking. And hackers don't get banned.
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
the last time they did this, me and my friend who doesnt have this game, had actually a good time.
for me, this game is just good enough to waste some time, were you know you just spend a short time playing it or before going to work. at least it works far more better then BF3. with BF3 i have constant connection crashes and the guns feel like they dont harm anyone, so as other problems.
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
gyro2death said:
I think the point of this is that PC isn't their core demographic but maybe this is them trying to put out the olive branch? Oh well, I lit the branch on fire and threw it back.
They do this with every game they release. It's nothing new.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Bobic said:
Treblaine said:
This game only stands a serious chance on PC if it goes Free-to-play or a VERY low starting price.
Just out of curiosity, but what do you mean by 'stands a chance'. A chance to do what? It's still in the steam top sellers list and has been since launch. It seems to me that it's succeeded quite considerably already.

Not that I'm gonna bother buying it 'til I see it for less than a tenner. But whatever.
I hesitated the second I posted that, as I knew that it has actually sold fairly well.

The problem is even today there peaked at 2.6x as many people on Steam are playing the very old Counter Strike (either Source or 1.6 version) compared to Modern Warfare 3. Modern Warfare 3 is not doing as well as it should be compared to on consoles, that's like console being beaten by more people playing Halo 1 and Halo 2.

MW3 makes sense on consoles, the relatively slow-movement and high Damage:health ratio suits the thumbstick movement and aiming (with aim-assist), and it seems it's popularity on consoles creates avarice on PC to accelerated it's success. But it's hardly playing to PC's strengths. Every load-out feels like some sort of sniper/heavy-hybrid with only subtle variation from one weapon to another, everyone has the same health and almost the same slow mobility.

And still the focus on overpowered killstreaks and emphasis on kill:death ratio. K/D ratio does nothing but encourage selfish and unambitious gamplay, i.e. camping and ignoring objectives. The only time a kill or death comparison is relevant is in team deathmatch and it shouldn't be a ratio but a kill to death NET! See if 3 kills 1 death is valued the same as 30 kills to 10 deaths, that's bullshit as one gives only a 2 point lead, the other gives a TWENTY point lead! That rewards playing well AND being ambitious. Really 3 kills 1 death is no different from 13 kills, 11 deaths.

But I still like the fundamentals of gameplay, but it's still so full of bullshit and banality.

The killstreaks are a distraction. They should be gambits to shake up gameplay but instead they just slow down the game, air support that turns into either a camp-fest or boring busy work shooting it down with a rocket launcher that YOU BETTER HAVE BROUGHT (and sacrificed your only other weapon slot) as no way else is it getting shot down. I guess the specialist pointstreaks working toward a MOAB is good but it's an elitist approach to gameplay, it's all about one guy getting the most kills, not pulling together as a team. Really, everyone can't get the sense of accomplishment, only the chance for one or two of them.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
gyro2death said:
I think the point of this is that PC isn't their core demographic but maybe this is them trying to put out the olive branch? Oh well, I lit the branch on fire and threw it back.
Offering free weekend but STILL charging $60 (plus another ~$50 for all the map packs) they might as well have been the one who lit the olive branch on fire.

It's kind of like offering a test drive of a basic small car and then charging $100'000 for the compact car you know they mass produce for pittance.
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
Is this such a good idea? I thought Modern Warfare hated PCs. They killed like, three of them in the last game.
That deserved a much better reception than it got. Well played sir.

OT: I can't really see this working for MW to be fair. There are people in this thread already bemoaning the exclusion of MW3's single player campaign in this offer (despite it only being five hours long, and five hours of overblown Hollywood crap at that) and whilst the multiplayer is great fun with mates I would say it takes longer than a weekend to learn the levels and gain a footing in the rather unforgiving environments that are the MW3 lobbies.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Das Boot said:
Treblaine said:
And still the focus on overpowered killstreaks and emphasis on kill:death ratio. K/D ratio does nothing but encourage selfish and unambitious gamplay, i.e. camping and ignoring objectives.
You seem to be very confused. The killstreaks are actually weaker in MW3 then they were in CoD4. Also the game doesnt put emphasis on kill:death ratio certain players do.
Killstreaks are VERY powerful and persistent in MW3; the AC-130, Reaper or Osprey gunner are far worse than the helicopter in COD4 and even that was a load of bullshit. Loads of servers on CoD4 on PC just ban the helicopter outright, especially on the large 60-player servers where helicopters can be called in constantly.

Uh, K/D ratio is tracked in MW3 and every CoD game. Not in CounterStrike nor Team Fortress 2. You have to admit there is a LOT of camping in Call of Duty. There is a huge disincentive in pushing forwards as that just invites a full-auto sniper to spawn behind you. I mean crap liek dead man's hand punishes those who dare to close to kill.
 

Bobic

New member
Nov 10, 2009
1,532
0
0
TheKasp said:
Bobic said:
Treblaine said:
This game only stands a serious chance on PC if it goes Free-to-play or a VERY low starting price.
Just out of curiosity, but what do you mean by 'stands a chance'. A chance to do what? It's still in the steam top sellers list and has been since launch. It seems to me that it's succeeded quite considerably already.

Not that I'm gonna bother buying it 'til I see it for less than a tenner. But whatever.
A chance of getting even half of the player numers that CS has. Outside of free play weekends they really pander rather low on numbers for the supposed best FPS MP expirience they want to achieve with every new installation of this cashcow genre.

Also, no. It is not in the steam top sellers list outside of sales.

Overall: MW3 is one of those small MP shooters on the PC. Not really worth mentioning since the last x games played exactly the same in MP, medium player numbers and added to that: it is a lazy port (yes, I call every FPS with narrow FOV a lazy port).
Just out of curiosity, is MW3 a steamworks game or are there players playing it that aren't on steam?

Anyway, regardless of that, saying that it's a 'small' mp shooter because it doesn't match the numbers of the largest seems pretty unfair.

http://store.steampowered.com/stats/

Being the 6th most played game is not 'small'. Particularly when 4 of those games above it are valve games on a valve service.

Also, what do you mean by not on the top sellers list outside of sales? On the steam homepage, it was tenth when I posted, and is currently 15th due to a few new releases and sales. And it's been in that list consistently since its release.

Treblaine said:
Hell, I'm not arguing that it necessarily deserves its success, I'm just saying that it is very successful. (yes, it's losing to CS, but as I said above, no one is beating CS, 6th place is not a failure.)
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
MW2 Free Weekend Experience:

HELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPNUKEBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBING
LASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPNUKEBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBING
HELICOPTERATTACKNUKEGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBING
LASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESNUKEMOREBOMBING
HELICOPTERATTACKNUKEGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBING
LASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGNUKEHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBING
HELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESNUKEMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBING
LASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESNUKEMOREBOMBING
HELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGNUKEHELICOPTERATTACKGUNSHIPBOMBING
LASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGHELICOPTERATTACKNUKEGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBING
HELICOPTERATTACKNUKEGUNSHIPBOMBINGLASERGUIDEDMISSLESMOREBOMBINGNUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKE.

(It was rubbish.)

Bobic said:
Just out of curiosity, is MW3 a steamworks game or are there players playing it that aren't on steam?
It's a Steamworks title.