chronobreak said:
Maybe she IS just a hard-working single mother. Is that really that out there to believe?
For goodness sake can you not see what I'm trying to explain? I am not agreeing or disagreeing. I'm stating the article has been deliberately written in such a way as to sway their readers on the side of the mother than the son.
If you were the editor, what position would you want to take on the story?
I would stick to the facts. Neither left wing nor right wing. I would not have manipulated the story so that it sides with either the mother or son, or have created biasedness of any kind.
I would not have mentioned the quote with the mother going to church for reasons which have already been pointed out to you. Neither would I have insinuated that the son was a videogame obsessive as that is also completely irrelavent to the story.
I don't see how believing that would make someone a marionette, dancing to the tune of the media, it's simply the more probably case.
No it is not. Like I have stated, there is not sufficiant evidence. Just because the mother states she can't control her son and sheds a few tears does not make her story fact.
Would I be dancing to the tune of the Herald if they reported contaminated food, and chose to not eat it?
Depends on the evidence they have to support their statements.
2. She says she wants to help her son. To me, this indicates the kid may spend entirely too much time focused on video games.
Or it may indicate she wants her son to not play videogames at all, but to read the bible instead. Or practice voodoo. Take up finger painting. Join the Taliban. We don't know what she means by "help her son", but you've assumed this to mean the kid is obsessed with videogames like a heroine addict (or at least this is what the Herald is trying to manipulate its readers to think).
What parent doesn't want better for their kids?
Yes, every parent wants the best for their kids. But we all have a different opinion as to what is best for our kids.
Playing at 2:30 may not be obsessive to him, but it certainly is to a single mom trying to maintain a certain order in HER household.
Fair enough, but that doesn't mean that he is officially obsessed with gaming. I'd more likely consider the mother to be the obsessive one if she goes to the extreme of calling the police just because her son is awake at 2:30 in the name of maintain order in her household.
But, alas, none of use are more right than the other, because we don't know the facts!
3. I have two kids. They can be very bratty when they make a concious decision to not listen. When kids don't listen, they are brats. If they do not listen one hundred percent of the time, they are a brat, if they don't listen ten percent of the time, than during that ten percent they are most certainly a brat.
What on earth does that mean? That kids are officially brats period because they don't listen just sometimes?
I would also like to remind you it is not just the singular comment of calling him a brat that I am concerned with but that you go on to call him "a little shit", a possible psycho and the mother as a "poor" victim over such little information.
4. I didn't even read the Herald Article, I saw this on Fox Boston. Dancing to the tune of something I haven't read, I am not.
What, 'Fox Boston' as in part of Fox News?
That's it... I, I, I just don't know what to say anymore. I think our conversation is over.