I dunno how you prove an unverified anonymous single sources alleged history wrong.erttheking said:Yeah except the site does do fairly good investigative journalism, as seen with the whole Anthem incident. Again, if you want to ignore the article, please prove it wrong. Also don't confuse "they have been exposed as yellow journalism" with "I think they're yellow journalism."Samtemdo8 said:I am just amazed people still posting Kotaku after they have been exposed as a yellow journalist/clickbait article website. This whole article reads like vacuous clickbait.erttheking said:Can you actually point out any factual errors in their article? If not I?m going to have to ask you to actually contribute to the thread.Samtemdo8 said:Ugh...Kotaku.
OT: The more I hear about the Mortal Kombat studio, the more I?m glad I have no interest in their games. I really don?t want to support their behavior.
Like sure, it can't be proven wrong, because there's nothing proving it right either.
The over-the-top ridiculous cartoon level MK violence, as "realistic" as they make it try and look texture wise or liquid physics, certainly doesn't hint to much practical research in the vein they're describing.
Kotaku being clickbaity as hell is pretty prominent. Not 100%, but they play pretty fast and loose with the details. I can't say much on the accuracy of the worker welfare reports, but there's been more then a few times they've printed unverified nonsense or actually provably inaccurate nonsense about games I was very familiar with (The ever-spiralling Fallout 76 saga for instance. Which had enough legitimate things to critique that it was insane that they would just make random stuff up, or source "community speculation" from a single dudes reddit post)