Sub Zero is still there, cyber sub zero is an unlockable that you really just have to play the story to find out why hes thereAroLombardi said:Cyber.... Sub-Zero? And that's a little disappointing. Armageddon may have not been the best, but it certainly got points for bringing together most if not all of the (real) characters.Yossarian1507 said:Looking at the Wikipedia, no. The roster have most of the fighters from MK3 + Quan Chi from MK4, and Cyber Sub-Zero (WTF? I'm curious about that one) + DLC brings up Kenshi from MK: Deadly Alliance.
I would put Kratos at least in the mid, he can be devestating once you learn his tricksKurt Horsting said:So far (could change once a few tourney results are out) the top characters arn't that op, but the runts are really bad. But the mid is really big and ambiguous right now, which is a good thing. So the tier list so far...(where they are currently and if they will stay at that position is subject to change)Yossarian1507 said:Finally. I was really worried there would be no MK review at all.
So... Glad to hear it's good, but I have one important question - how's the balance? Is there any overpowered character, or one who you shouldn't even bother playing with? It's important to me, because every time I pick up a fighter, it turns out I'm taking the crappiest guy of the bunch (Anji Mito in GG, Tager in BlazBlue [although I managed to skill up with him, so at least I'm able to beat up my friends and sometimes even compete on-line], Rock in Soul Calibur III & IV etc.)
Top - Shang Tsung, Ermac, Johnny Cage, and Nightwolf.
Mid - Everyone else.
Bottom - Quan Chi, Cyber Sub-Zero, Sheeva, Sektor (could be low mid) Kratos (PS3 only)
Not that I'm the go-to guy about MK, but from my experiance, almost everyone has a fighting chance against anyone, and the runts have a few gimicks that make them useful. But it is an up-hill battle for them.
Yep... Ever since I watched the trailers, I totally called Ermac the top. Looks like my experience with other fighting games finally gave me some perks in terms of insight.Kurt Horsting said:So far (could change once a few tourney results are out) the top characters arn't that op, but the runts are really bad. But the mid is really big and ambiguous right now, which is a good thing. So the tier list so far...(where they are currently and if they will stay at that position is subject to change)
Top - Shang Tsung, Ermac, Johnny Cage, and Nightwolf.
Mid - Everyone else.
Bottom - Quan Chi, Cyber Sub-Zero, Sheeva, Sektor (could be low mid) Kratos (PS3 only)
Not that I'm the go-to guy about MK, but from my experiance, almost everyone has a fighting chance against anyone, and the runts have a few gimicks that make them useful. But it is an up-hill battle for them.
I jumped up and down and clapped, no lie.Ne1butme said:that review needs to end with a small video of Susan doing a victory dance after performing the fatality.
Uh, why? Admittedly, my fighting game tastes tend more toward the Guilty Gear/Blazblue realm, (with the exception of Soul Calibur which will ALWAYS be my favorite fighter of all time) but I don't really see what my gender has to do with it.Azmael Silverlance said:I thought it was a bit weird that a woman was reviewing the game.
Well, yes, I really should've said "almost all" for strictest accuracy.anotherdaydown said:MK through UMK3 are some my favorite games of all time. I was at the arcade as much as possible when those were out. I am pretty stoked at the job they've done with the latest effort. This really is a great game. The only glaring error I found in the review is the mention of all characters being available at start. You have to unlock Cyber Sub-Zero and Quan Chi. I also believe the fatalities in this game are easier than ever to pull off.
It has. I'm right there with you hating the rest of the series for its shit gameplay, but this one is legitimately good.Onyx Oblivion said:I might actually have to get this...I've been laughing at MK since...well...ever. Even the olden days. It seems to have grown competent fighting mechanics, suddenly.
It makes sense in context. Play the game to find out. Now.AroLombardi said:Cyber.... Sub-Zero?
teh_Canape said:fuck you Noob Saibot
FUCK.YOU
he's my boy as wellLord Beautiful said:Don't be dissing my boy now. Well, he was my boy. Then I played Ermac. Now he's not my boy, but he is my future tag partner. So yeah. Don't be hatin'.
There are a few unbalanced characters online. I find Smoke, Scorpion and even Sub-Zero really cheap. The first two more than the third. They are the noob characters of the game with really really really easy moves. Sub-Zero just pisses me off because his play style is so easy to get abused against. An in all, it's good. Also, be prepared to face very very very cheap players in ranked games, they will do anything to win. I/e spam one move.Yossarian1507 said:Finally. I was really worried there would be no MK review at all.
So... Glad to hear it's good, but I have one important question - how's the balance? Is there any overpowered character, or one who you shouldn't even bother playing with? It's important to me, because every time I pick up a fighter, it turns out I'm taking the crappiest guy of the bunch (Anji Mito in GG, Tager in BlazBlue [although I managed to skill up with him, so at least I'm able to beat up my friends and sometimes even compete on-line], Rock in Soul Calibur III & IV etc.)