most disappointing game sequels

[tunnel b1]

Fight night round 4,GTA4,Ratchet and clank 3,Ratchet:gladiator,Ratche and Clank:tools of destruction and hitman blood money

 

[Yoshemo]

Silent Hill 4. It was still fun but it never scared me or made me feel anything like the others

 

[Church256]

Arn't all sequels disappointing? I know Halo 2 & 3 are probably the most disappointing.

 

[SsilverR]

any tenchu made after 2 birth of the stealth assasin

 

[deathstrikesquirrel]

Resident Evil 5, they broke the fun by putting in a partner and broke it even more with real time inventory

 

[deathstrikesquirrel]

CoD:W@W

madness, they improved it in every way

BLASPHEMY!

HEATHEN! GET OFF THIS SITE RIGHT NOW!

\
well, they did give you a flame thrower for starters

 

[Schlorgan]

CoD:W@W

madness, they improved it in every way

HOW?!?!?!?!?!?!!? They just added fire effects and took it back to world war 2, it was nowhere near as good as COD4, so just accept that and we'll move on

 

[ohgodalex]

Sonic 2.
/thread

 

[theSovietConnection]

GTAIV

whats wrong with Gta4?

I don't think there was anything wrong with it, I personally loved it. I think the biggest problem was that they named it Grand Theft Auto. I get the feeling if it had been a whole new game series and not GTA, there wouldn't be as much hatred toward it. This is the first time Rockstar took the series in a rather serious direction, so people went in expecting the wacky shenanigans from the previous iterations of the game and didn't really get them.

 

[Schlorgan]

CoD:W@W

madness, they improved it in every way

BLASPHEMY!

HEATHEN! GET OFF THIS SITE RIGHT NOW!

\
thanks for that, he needed it

 

[Sergeant M. Fudgey]

Zelda Twilight Princess. It was easy but tedious as hell.
Halo 3. Campaign is dull and repetitive, online would be fun, but so many game-types are shit and there is no good way of finding the games you want, so it ends up being fun only about 1/3 of the time.

 

[knightguy123]

GTAIV

I agree, it was so dull. Why the hell should I have to escort my cousin to entertain him???

i agree but the way you say entertain creeps me out

 

[knightguy123]

CoD:W@W

madness, they improved it in every way

BLASPHEMY!

HEATHEN! GET OFF THIS SITE RIGHT NOW!

\
thanks for that, he needed it

1.he was talking to you 2.found call of duty 4 just cruching along on multiplayer and i found the nuke scene boring and not the tearsheader everyone said which in WaW i cared about the story and moral choice scenes were great

 

[Lord Mountbatten Reborn]

Street Fighter VI was a bit of a let down

I suppose it would be, seeing as it isn't out yet.

 

[Wounded Melody]

FFX-2

 

[kiltmanfortywo]

GTAIV wasn't as good as I had hoped. Also, I really like W@W.

 

[fer1wi]

Perfect Dark, 360 1, the original was actually fun to play..not depressing and buggy

I FREAKIN' agree with you! PDZ wasn't what I thought it would be. They screwed up the story line,gameplay wasn't that good, and what is with the main villains? Perfect Dark on the N64 (I am glad I still own it, along with GoldenEye, and Vigilante 8, to name a few), was by far a great game.

 

[Lord Mountbatten Reborn]

CoD:W@W

madness, they improved it in every way

BLASPHEMY!

HEATHEN! GET OFF THIS SITE RIGHT NOW!

\
thanks for that, he needed it

1.he was talking to you 2.found call of duty 4 just cruching along on multiplayer and i found the nuke scene boring and not the tearsheader everyone said which in WaW i cared about the story and moral choice scenes were great

Did you just say WaW had story? MoH: Pacific Assault made a far better attempt at the war in the Pacific than WaW. Kiefer Sutherland played Roebuck and should've been great, but he sounded so false throughout the whole thing, as though Roebuck had spent the entire game stoned. I admit the Russian campaign saved WaW slightly by being fun, and Sgt. Reznov is one of my favourite characters ever, but there was no story, just "Kill the enemy and win the war bizzatches.", as well as a few "I hate the Germans very much and they will lose."s.

I felt absolutely nothing for my characters. In fact, whenever one would meet a grisly end I would cry with relief at not having to put up with them any more. There's only the one moral choice scene, and it happens so fast you don't care; the characters were so fake that when one died I shot at the other one (Roebuck's supposedly emotional acting just made me feel like he was trying to address a piece of wood and trying not to yell "Cut!" and storm off to his trailer) to end my suffering. It felt slightly worth it I guess when I hoisted the Soviet flag over the Reichstag with, perhaps not believable, slightly insane Sergeant leading the whole Soviet army, but at least likeable, Reznov, but really, CoD4 just leaves WaW dead in a bayou some miles back behind it.

I'm not saying WaW is a bad game, it just isn't what you should make to follow-up Modern Warfare.

 

[knightguy123]

CoD:W@W

madness, they improved it in every way

BLASPHEMY!

HEATHEN! GET OFF THIS SITE RIGHT NOW!

\
thanks for that, he needed it

1.he was talking to you 2.found call of duty 4 just cruching along on multiplayer and i found the nuke scene boring and not the tearsheader everyone said which in WaW i cared about the story and moral choice scenes were great

Did you just say WaW had story? MoH: Pacific Assault made a far better attempt at the war in the Pacific than WaW. Kiefer Sutherland played Roebuck and should've been great, but he sounded so false throughout the whole thing, as though Roebuck had spent the entire game stoned. I admit the Russian campaign saved WaW slightly by being fun, and Sgt. Reznov is one of my favourite characters ever, but there was no story, just "Kill the enemy and win the war bizzatches.", as well as a few "I hate the Germans very much and they will lose."s.

I felt absolutely nothing for my characters. In fact, whenever one would meet a grisly end I would cry with relief at not having to put up with them any more. There's only the one moral choice scene, and it happens so fast you don't care; the characters were so fake that when one died I shot at the other one (Roebuck's supposedly emotional acting just made me feel like he was trying to address a piece of wood and trying not to yell "Cut!" and storm off to his trailer) to end my suffering. It felt slightly worth it I guess when I hoisted the Soviet flag over the Reichstag with, perhaps not believable, slightly insane Sergeant leading the whole Soviet army, but at least likeable, Reznov, but really, CoD4 just leaves WaW dead in a bayou some miles back behind it.

I'm not saying WaW is a bad game, it just isn't what you should make to follow-up Modern Warfare.

1. did you even read my post are skip to the end idiot 2.theres more than one choice scene 3.you obviously didnt save polawarsky

 

[Lord Mountbatten Reborn]

Really? Hitman: Blood Money? That

KOTOR 2, was terrible.

Sure, it wasnt as addicting as the original, but I still love it. In fact I was playing it earlier today.Backwards compatability on the 360 aint all bad.

I did the right thing with this game, and played it before the first. Consequently, I love both of them. It really works if you do that you know. I actually played Invisible War before Deus Ex, and seeing as it is actually a good game in its own right (but just dies when you know and have played what it is the sequel to), so I very much liked it when I got Deus Ex. And of course, that one blew me away. I therefore like both games.

You should try it guys! Play slightly, or very, disappointing sequels first if they're good games in their own right, then the prequels, and you will be able to enjoy both!