You'd be surprised how many people are unaware of how old W40K is, no need for the sarcasm.William Catching said:WOW! IT'S LIKE I DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT EXISTED BEFORE HALO AND WASN'T MAKING A REFERENCE TO SOMETHING PEOPLE KNOW?! THAT'S AMAZING!!!ChupathingyX said:You do realise that W40K has been around way longer than Halo has, how can you compare it to Halo?William Catching said:Warhammer 40K: Halo, only darker and better
Reboots?Vigormortis said:I know some will argue that Final Fantasy doesn't count because it's been around for more than a decade, but that doesn't change the fact that there's been well over twenty different games, remakes, reboots, and spin-offs within the series. Over twenty. At this point, even as they announce more titles to come, it's painfully obvious Square-Enix is milking the franchise.
This was going to be my response as well. I haven't had much exposure to FIFA for a while now, but I used to play Madden a hell of a lot with my cousin. Can anyone honestly say out there that there is a legitimate reason for releasing a new Madden every year other than making sure they still have all the players' names on the right teams?OhJohnNo said:I am surprised by all the people not saying Madden or FIFA. I mean, not that this makes them worse at what they do (if you like sports games), but haven't they had a yearly release schedule for ages, and changed little for many, many installments?
To be fair, the only 'rehashing' going on with Halo is the re-release of the first game, which was being specifically asked for by Halo's fans, so Microsoft/Bungie/343 can't really be blamed for that.Aurgelmir said:Games like Halo on the other hand have been milked way to much. The main 1-3 games being one story, but NOOOO thats not enough lets crap out other rehashes of the same because fans will buy it. And now Microsoft states they will make 4-6 also...
How about something new instead Microsoft?
Yeah, this thread can pretty much stop now. We have a winner.likalaruku said:Not a game, but...Land Before Time.