Justanewguy said:
No offense, but I found MW2's ending so cliched and so obvious that I've sworn off the franchise. Even worse, though I predicted it, it still made little sense to me. Perhaps I just have too high of beliefs in the USA, but I can't buy a US General causing a war that he knows will cost hundreds of thousands of lives (which, lets be honest, and invasion of Washington DC would cost at least that). I accept that I'm supposed to suspend disbelief, but when the entire rest of the game prides itself on a fairly realistic attitude toward things, I'm not as likely to give the story a free pass.
*shrug* Can't account for crazy. Though I do say, I wouldn't want to go down in the history books as "That guy who got an entire army blown up by an atomic bomb". Its established pretty early on that Shepard doesn't really give a crap about being careful with human lives; "Since when does Shepard care about Danger Close?", so its not entirely implausible. Also, I don't think any of the CoD games since 3 and possibly WaW have had a realistic attitude towards things. They're pretty clearly supposed to be Tom Clancy style techno thrillers, ostensibly set in the real world but taking place in their own little world of high intrigue, politics, and war.
Also, by shocking I really meant more for the ramifications of the story, rather than the events. It puts the good guys in a very precarious position, especially considering that, otherwise, they were pretty on top of things for most of the game. Imagine if the ending of MW1 had only been the halfway point, and then you had to get out of Russia with nearly your entire squad dead and a whole army of guys chasing you. Thats sort of where we are now going into MW3. And thats not even accounting for the Americans, who at least got a "happy" ending that by all accounts isn't going to mean much if the trailers for MW3 are to be believed.