Mother Finds Kidnapped Children On Facebook

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
I doubt anyone is really going to read this, since it's page 7 or 8 at this point, but "kidnapping" in a legal sense is not the horrible thing that so many respondents are condemning the father for. From a legal standpoint, if one parent denies the other's custody rights by keeping the children from them and moves away, it is considered kidnapping. This is regardless of the reason for Dad removing the kids from Mom's vicinity.

My wife was technically kidnapped by her mother when she was 11 until she was 18 but her father refused to press charges against her mother because it would've caused far more problems than it solved. My wife and I both agree that her dad should have come and taken her and her brother away from their mom because she was the lousy parent.

In the case in this article, we have no idea why Dad removed the kids from Mom and ran off to Florida. Was Mom involved in drugs, gangs, prostitution, etc.? Was Dad? We don't really know enough details to condemn either party, though in another article about this it mentioned that the daughter told the mom that they were happy with their father in Florida and told Mom to leave her alone. To me, that is very telling. Also, the Daughter in this case is probably 18 or so at this point, which means that she's a legal adult and doesn't have to go anywhere with her Mom if she doesn't want to. There are a few rare exceptions to this rule, but this case doesn't seem to be one.
 

Discrodia

New member
Dec 7, 2008
132
0
0
Now, here's how I see it:

Father kidnaps kids after relationship with wife goes sour. As the kids are living in Florida and have access to computers, the father is presumably not a raving drug-addicted psycopath. Mother searches for years, and eventually finds kids on facebook. Justice intervenes, the day is saved, kids returned to mother, everyone is happy except father, who is now in court.

Now, my guesses on the motivations of various parties. There isn't enough information about either parents, but for now I'll assume they're both average, middle class American citizens.

Father: He definitly gets the worst of it. Women are always viewed with sympathy by the courts and the media (except in politics, but that is a different debate) and even if the wife was the spawn of satan the father knew that any jury would rule in her favor with their old 'kids need the mother' line. Father figures at this age kids won't remember mother, so he flees to Florida. He settles down, and evidently is not caught. Kids experience relatively normal childhood and evidently don't remember mother.

MANY YEARS LATER

Father is abruptly notified that mother has found children on facebook when police storm his house / apartment and arrest him. He is now in a massive legal battle with a woman he left 15 years ago over children he raised and bonded with in a court system with massive prejudice against men in any issue regarding children.

Mother: In my mind she's a bit of a *****. While she likely did suffer from the theft of her children, she evidently wasn't heartbroken enough to do some simple steps such as hiring a private investigator or the like to try and track down her husband, instead relying on local police who evidently failed.

MANY YEARS LATER

Mother abruptly discovers children on facebook. Rather than trying and contacting them discretely before taking action, she immmediatly figures the best way to go about this is to call in the law and end up with two children who she knows nothing about, has had no contact with for 15 years, who are uprooted from a place that they've lived for most of their lives, and are now filled with the knowledge that both their dad is a kidnapper and their mom is completely off her bird.

Kids: While they're not being screwed by the system, they are seriously being screwed by their mother. As they are reasonably old, their likely response is to be along the lines of "what the hell is this?". I, for one (speaking as a 16 year old) would be extremely creeped out if some lady from California, who I have never met, arrested my dad who I've known my whole life, destroyed any hope of ever having a normal life, and now is demanding that I uproot myself from the only home I've ever remembered to come live in California. While the daughter can escape this, the son is in for some serious trauma in this matter.

To be honest, the real victim isn't the mom, it's the kids. The mother acted irrationally, and no matter how much she claims to "love her children", in the end she just falsified that because of everything she's going to put them through now.
 

UkibyTheMaid

New member
Aug 11, 2009
205
0
0
The 'right thing' in this case sure is in that strange gray zone no one's quite sure if it's good or bad.

Not knowing a thing about both the mother and the father doesn't help either...
 

Mullahgrrl

New member
Apr 20, 2008
1,011
0
0
Matt_LRR said:
Yeah, this story is really grey for me. The father and mother were split, adn the father ran off with the kids, denying his former wife's custody.

But he was ostensibly a good father who cared for the kids, and raised them.

So now this woman, who holds a legal claim, finds them and takes them back after 15 years, severing their relationship with their father, and leaving them in the custody of a woman they probably don't even remember, and have no relationship with?

If I were the kids, I'd probably be furious with her.

So yeah, legal justice was served, but are the kids "better off" for it? Unlikely.

-m
Well, at least now they don't have to be called Uthera.

Seriously, I don't know what the mothers name is but I cant imagine the kids not being better off with her.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
Mullahgrrl said:
Matt_LRR said:
Yeah, this story is really grey for me. The father and mother were split, adn the father ran off with the kids, denying his former wife's custody.

But he was ostensibly a good father who cared for the kids, and raised them.

So now this woman, who holds a legal claim, finds them and takes them back after 15 years, severing their relationship with their father, and leaving them in the custody of a woman they probably don't even remember, and have no relationship with?

If I were the kids, I'd probably be furious with her.

So yeah, legal justice was served, but are the kids "better off" for it? Unlikely.

-m
Well, at least now they don't have to be called Uthera.

Seriously, I don't know what the mothers name is but I cant imagine the kids not being better off with her.
So, because the dad has a funny sounding last name he's a bad parent and the mother is not? The article leaves her unnamed, so who's to say that her last name isn't something like "Vaginahurtz" or something like that?
 

Mullahgrrl

New member
Apr 20, 2008
1,011
0
0
Nigh Invulnerable said:
Mullahgrrl said:
Matt_LRR said:
Yeah, this story is really grey for me. The father and mother were split, adn the father ran off with the kids, denying his former wife's custody.

But he was ostensibly a good father who cared for the kids, and raised them.

So now this woman, who holds a legal claim, finds them and takes them back after 15 years, severing their relationship with their father, and leaving them in the custody of a woman they probably don't even remember, and have no relationship with?

If I were the kids, I'd probably be furious with her.

So yeah, legal justice was served, but are the kids "better off" for it? Unlikely.

-m
Well, at least now they don't have to be called Uthera.

Seriously, I don't know what the mothers name is but I cant imagine the kids not being better off with her.
So, because the dad has a funny sounding last name he's a bad parent and the mother is not? The article leaves her unnamed, so who's to say that her last name isn't something like "Vaginahurtz" or something like that?
Well, we pretty much just have his name and the kidnapping stuff to go on.

There is now way they would leave out her name if it was Vaginahurtz.
 

chris89300

Senior Member
Jun 5, 2010
213
0
21
Meeeeeeeh, Facebook didn't do anything, it's just that the mother was "SO bright" to look for them there.

Tip: is was obvious too look for them on "social" sites.

Anyways, yeah, I agree with the guys that point out the obvious, like yes, maybe they were saved, but also, maybe there's living a shittier life now. I know I'd like to live in Florida, with all the hot chicks around. Besides, I'm guessing that if she didn't give up for 15 years, she's a pretty grudgy *****, so my guess is the kids were better off with their dad.

Screw the legal system, it's all bullshit
 

leviathanmisha

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,305
0
0
cainx10a said:
soren7550 said:
cainx10a said:
They probably bonded with the father more by now, well, good job destroying that relation Mrs.
Uh, he STOLE them from their mother. He deserves nothing but the worse.
I would actually praise my dad if he stole me from my mother. But that's just me I guess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zN6MxLYB8hM
No, I'm right behind you.

OT: Well, nothing is stated about the woman, so I can't make any assupmtions, but her daughter is a legal adult if the ages match up, so she could very well go back to Florida if she wanted to. Pity the son though, he's stuck with this woman who basically uprooted his whole life for "the sake of justice."
 

Kamaitachi

New member
Dec 17, 2009
275
0
0
Facebook re-united me with an uber old friend of mine, whos parents took when they ran away from debt.

oh yeah! :)
 

Necrofudge

New member
May 17, 2009
1,242
0
0
So they just cut off the emotional bond the children may have built with the father?

Then again if he kidnapped them he was probably wasn't a very good person to begin with...
 

bellstar

New member
Jun 10, 2010
8
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
she searched for and found her daughter on Facebook. I guess we know who the favorite child is.
That was a foolish statement to make. Just because she found the daughter first does not mean that she favored her daughter over her son.