Music is in a bad way...

londelen

New member
Apr 15, 2009
408
0
0
Of course Radio stuff is bad, the stuff they there isn't music, it's a travesty designed to squeeze cash from the lowest common denominator in people.
 

lokust2001

New member
Mar 4, 2008
68
0
0
Perhaps stop listening to the radio and get out there to listen to less well known bands, the radio is certainly not anywhere near a definitive summary of the entire spectrum of music of the current generation. There are tonnes of bands out their ranging from every genre, every style, and from terrible to awesome, you've just gotta look for them!
 

Alex Cowan

New member
Feb 13, 2010
269
0
0
Cynical skeptic said:
Alex Cowan said:
After all, they said that Rock n' Roll was a fad, and look where we are now...
...

Not... generally... listening to... rock n' roll?

Sure, the Beatles formula has persisted to even now, but I can't think of a single band from the 00's I'd place in that genre. The closest thing currently being produced is what country has become, and its all simply god awful tripe.
I know the 50s/60s formula had changed, but by "Rock n' Roll is a fad" people meant that after a while teenagers would stop having their own styles of music and go back to the listening habits of their parents' generation, which hasn't happened. Rock n' Roll has evolved into genres we know today, and hasn't died at all. I'm not saying chart music today is good, far from it, but underneath the garbage good music is still being made.

The reason I quoted that in the first place is that I wanted to show how the people of one generation cannot judge the significance of that generation until it has passed - just like people assumed Elvis would be a one-hit-wonder - it's impossible to tell until a good few decades after.
 

Guest_Star

New member
Jul 25, 2010
254
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
I have been switching off the radio very often recently as all I'm hearing is awful, autotuned nonsense and I'm sad over the state of music these days.
So stop listening to the radio then.

MiracleOfSound said:
Some people may count Muse, Arcade Fire or Kings Of Leon, to that I say fair enough for Muse, but AF and KOL have not (to the best of my knowledge) had nearly the same cultural and musical influence as most of the big bands of the other decades.
That's cuz the playing field has gotten too fucken wide. The consumer has too wide a choice.
You gotter be real original to show up on the soundscape if you don't have backing from the record industry all the way.
And they only back surefire winners.
Besides, most of the "oldies" are still going strong, leaving no room for newcomers.

But, there's other mediums than radio. Create and listen to you own stream, no use in letting "the man" tell you what to do.
 

Cynical skeptic

New member
Apr 19, 2010
799
0
0
I'm just going to say it... but every sort of disagreement on this basically boils down to, "MUSIC ISN'T SHITTY NOW! HERE, LISTEN TO A FEW BANDS ONLY I'VE EVER HEARD OF!"

The reality is the "pop" of the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s lead people down paths they otherwise never would've taken. While the pop of the 00's was completely self-contained. If you liked it, you weren't going to find it anywhere else as it has no influences. It was derived entirely from everything thats ever been popular, with every sharp edge electronically ground away.

In the 80s, synthesizers were criticized because most the successful bands couldn't play an "actual" instrument. You still have the video from flock of seagulls where the guy is just holding a single key and trying to make it look impressive. But he still made whatever that keyboard was automatically spewing. Beiber, for example, has never picked up an instrument. All the music is constructed by his handlers. Hes nothing but a face, as even his voice is auto-tuned.
Alex Cowan said:
I know the 50s/60s formula had changed, but by "Rock n' Roll is a fad" people meant that after a while teenagers would stop having their own styles of music and go back to the listening habits of their parents' generation, which hasn't happened. Rock n' Roll has evolved into genres we know today, and hasn't died at all. I'm not saying chart music today is good, far from it, but underneath the garbage good music is still being made.

The reason I quoted that in the first place is that I wanted to show how the people of one generation cannot judge the significance of that generation until it has passed - just like people assumed Elvis would be a one-hit-wonder - it's impossible to tell until a good few decades after.
The problem is that the successful bands of today have made more money and sold more records than Elvis did while he was still alive. Selling a million records was a big deal back then. Now its a benchmark. Then, despite the millions of records sold, the bands won't be remembered in a few years.
 

Harlemura

Ace Defective
May 1, 2009
3,327
0
0
Interesting, I don't like the majority, if not any of the artists listed in the OP.
I'm not saying that the more recent stuff is golden, but the music that parks itself in the mainstream has never been my favourite.

I look at the hundreds of recent artists as a bigger chance of there being something I'll like. But until old Mega Man music climbs into the charts, I doubt popular stuff will ever be present in my most played.
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
I have been switching off the radio very often recently as all I'm hearing is awful, autotuned nonsense and I'm sad over the state of music these days.

Every decade apart from the last one has given us tonnes of classic artists that have had a huge, defining sound that rocked the world.

The 50s had.. well, you know who.

The 60s had the Stones, Beatles, Bob Dylan, James Brown, Hendrix, The Supremes, Beach Boys ect...

The 70s had Zeppelin, Bowie, Grateful Dead, Stevie Wonder, Fleetwood Mac, Black Sabbath, Pink Floyd, Bob Marley, etc...

The 80s had Iron Maiden, Guns'N'Roses, The Who (also 70s), U2, Metallica, Depeche Mode, Michael Jackson, Prince, Madonna, Springsteen, Run DMC etc ect

The 90s had Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Public Enemy, NWA, Radiohead, Prodigy, Bjork, Oasis, Nine Inch Nails etc...

In the naughties, in my opinion there was not one band or artist who came along and gave us such new, fresh, exciting world changing music as all of these wonderful musicians.

Some people may count Muse, Arcade Fire or Kings Of Leon, to that I say fair enough for Muse, but AF and KOL have not (to the best of my knowledge) had nearly the same cultural and musical influence as most of the big bands of the other decades.

Or am I wrong? Will you show me some good music to make me smile, Escapists? Something with some heart and soul that came out in the last few years, that could be potentially as world changing as the greats?

Prove me wrong and I will be happy!
Have you noticed that people only consider their music good when they look back on it?

Because I have.

Nostalgic people who said "This music isn't that great," when it was actually being made are now saying "New music sucks, old music is better,".

Give it 10 years and you'll get people saying "Music from 2000 was way better than this music now,".

Regardless, you won't find any music people considered "world changing". The music industry revolves around making money now. Take the passion out of music and you just have sound played over a radio. While most people don't care about this, and the average joe just listens to it without thinking about it, you won't get any "world changing" music.

2K music though...

I'm going with Daft Punk, Coldplay, Nickelback and the Black Eyed Peas.

I don't think they're good but they were all popular and remain semi-popular now.

Music that will make you smile?

Les Claypool's work. He's put out two albums in the last few years. Even though Primus is on hiatus right now, he's still making music, which I think is awesome.

Buckethead. In almost any song he is, he's got a distinctive sound and style. You can pick him out of a song by guitar alone. Words are not needed. And he's been in so many collaborative groups, that in all, he's been able to churn out tons of music.

Alice in Chains. Their newest album is just another check mark in a long line of musical successes. And I've always had a soft spot for their "nearly metal" sound.

The White Stripes. These fellows sort of define "alternative" music for me. They're the flagship of the armada, as far as I see it. They're popular, their music is good and they're good performers.

Them Crooked Vultures. It's a supergroup of some of the best of the best. If they continue to make albums, they'll get success quickly.

Shinedown. I think they sound a lot like Nickelback. But the '90s Nickelback that didn't puss out on songs and make them all about hicks in love and guns.

Wolfmother. Amazing group here, with songs that have been everywhere. Listen through their album and you'll get the feeling of "I've heard this before,". It's because you have. A lot of their music has been used in film trailers, movies and the like, and that's because it's pretty bloody good.
 

Midnight Crossroads

New member
Jul 17, 2010
1,912
0
0
Cynical skeptic said:
I'm just going to say it... but every sort of disagreement on this basically boils down to, "MUSIC ISN'T SHITTY NOW! HERE, LISTEN TO A FEW BANDS ONLY I'VE EVER HEARD OF!"

The reality is the "pop" of the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s lead people down paths they otherwise never would've taken. While the pop of the 00's was completely self-contained. If you liked it, you weren't going to find it anywhere else as it has no influences. It was derived entirely from everything thats ever been popular, with every sharp edge electronically ground away.
It isn't even 2011 and you're claiming the music of today hasn't influenced new artists?
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
There's a heap of shit in every decade. It just gets forgotten.

To be honest, the 00's weren't that bad. Metal is in better shape than it's been since the eighties (Mastodon formed in 1999, Machine Head released some great albums, Lamb Of God formed in 1998). 'Proper' rock is coming back a bit (Stone Gods, Black Stone Cherry, Airbourne, Black Spiders, Priestess).

And of course, in 2004, Streetlight Manifesto formed.

EDIT:
Cynical skeptic said:
Alex Cowan said:
After all, they said that Rock n' Roll was a fad, and look where we are now...
...

Not... generally... listening to... rock n' roll?

Sure, the Beatles formula has persisted to even now, but I can't think of a single band from the 00's I'd place in that genre. The closest thing currently being produced is what country has become, and its all simply god awful tripe.
Admittedly, proper rock (not this pussy ass indie bullshit) is unfortunately hard to find, but it's there. Stone Gods, Black Stone Cherry, Airbourne and Black Spiders are all rock bands from the last ten years.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
I think the real problem is the internet. Now that it's use is so commonplace we find bands taking advatage of it and posting their music for everyone to hear. In the past, if you wanted to be heard you had to demonstrate enough talent and a broad enough appeal to get signed by a label. Now, people can just make a Myspace page to post their crappy music and then they spam it at people until they have an audience. It just means niche styles are gettting more exposure.
 

BlindMessiah94

The 94th Blind Messiah
Nov 12, 2009
2,654
0
0
It's not that there isn't any new music out there or genre changing stuff...It's just that the radio doesn't play it. The radio is NOT a good source for music anymore, and that's the real sad state of affairs. Eventually radio will just die. As soon as the majority of the world is wireless there will be no reason for anyone to listen to the radio when they can connect to any internet radio station and listen to anything they want.

Besides, there are tons of bands with amazing sounds out there changing genres. You just gotta find em and say "screw the radio".

Examples: Mute Math, Delhi to Dublin if you don't believe me.
 

khaimera

Perfect Strangers
Jun 23, 2009
1,957
0
0
I gave up on radio years ago. You should too. For good music, look no further than my recent thread.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.226972-I-Love-Techno?page=1
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Well, it sounds like you need some better radio stations. For one thing, lots of those bands are still going, but I guess you don't count that.

Anyway, we have* the the Raconteurs, the Black Keys, Cage the Elephant, Halford, the White Stripes, Damageplan, Fueled by Fire, Hellyeah, and more I can't think of.

*some of these were formed in the late 90s, but still...
 

tomtom94

aka "Who?"
May 11, 2009
3,373
0
0
The main reason in my view is mainstream music has become increasingly reliant on ONE person - the vocalist - being backed by chord progressions on guitar/keyboard, 16 different backing vocal tracks echoing to satisfy the producer, and enough reverb to kill a small state.

This is increasingly starting to spread from pop and mainstream hip-hop/rap into rock music too.

I mostly stick to punk (and Green Day) myself.
 

Arkhangelsk

New member
Mar 1, 2009
7,702
0
0
Well, the 00's gave us this:

Some might argue that it doesn't count since they have been on since '93, but they're still making good music in this era.
 

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
Outright Villainy said:
Well there's no ground breaking big bands in the last decade, but then I prefer more obscure stuff or metal. Not world changing as you say, but I don't really care for all the "greats" anyway. Out of every band you mentioned I only like Pearl jam and Hendrix.

So schmeh I say to big bands. Schmeh!
I think the Fray is going to be remembered as a big hit band, for better or worse.
 

Flamezdudes

New member
Aug 27, 2009
3,696
0
0
Take. A look. At. MUSE.

They mix ochestral, rock, electronica and metal with their music and fill it up with Matt Bellamy's signature voice which everyone can tell is from MUSE.

They are just absolutely brilliant, however i do beleive music has gone down slightly with all the samey stuff and boring teen bands and rappers.

Them Crooked Vultures are absolutely bad ass though, they're a supergroup (Although they have said they don't like to be called that) of Dave Grohl(Foo Fighters, Nirvana), Josh Homme (Queens of the Stone Age) and John Paul Jones (Led Zeppelin).