MW3 no different than MW2....(some MW3 gameplay)
- Thread starter yuval152
- Start date
Ah - the old sterotyping of fanbases, it has returned.Jesse Billingsley said:
So b/c they're COD or Halo fans they're lesser then you? Because I like Halo, you're better then me?
It's sad that people act as if COD and Halo fan are some how lesser for liking them and that if you're looking forward to different games, you're somehow better then them.
I feel sorry for you COD fans, I really do. Atleast black-ops made an effort. I'm not saying it won't be fun, i'm just saying that you are all going to spend full price for what amounts to an unusually large mappack, with a new campaign and added killstreaks. Oh i forgot the MW1 perks they added back too my bad. ima just stick to BF3.AmrasCalmacil said:
I would gladly pay $60 for 15 new maps, new weapons, and a ton of balance improvements. Hell, I'd pay $60 if they would just remove Grenade Launchers and Commando from MW2 and repackage it.psychodynamica said:
... maybe I shouldn't say that in a public forum. Activision might be watching.
The thing is,most sequels actually do change much more than CoD does,and even when they don't change that much,it's still okay because their game isn't the seventieth installment in a game that most people just buy for the multiplayer.I never planned on buying it myself just because I don't like it,but people are trying to make their games just like CoD because it's making so much money,and original ideas are getting smothered in the flood of cash to these games.
Did I say "I am more 'superior' over myself" (I am a Halo fan too dude). Do I think I am more superior then my college buddies who also like Reach? No.Korten12 said:
I dislike the people who would rather play a ported version of Halo 3's shitty multiplayer and story over something that takes both of those things, analyzes them, and then comes up with something completely different but twice as good. Go on the 343 forums, they hate Reach so much, they had to make a goddamn petition against Armor Abilities, A PETITION! Then look on the Bungie Forums, and you'll find tons of threads about how Reach blows a fat one and blame it on Bloom or Armor abilities. Those are the assholes I can't stand.
If you like Reach because its a good game, then good for you I like you.
To be honest you make a good point, but I think it's a little cheeky calling a whole new game. And I really, really, really worry about te balancing, mw2 was bad enough, i hope this is a little more polished. they must have had plenty of time to do this after all the 'work' they actually did.MetallicaRulez0 said:
You know, it's funny how we harp so hard on EA for being such a dick lately with all the BF3 vs MW3 mudslinging. Looking at comments, it seems like they are just sticking to their target demographic. The fans are acting the exact same way.
To me, it's better to compare Call of Duty to Combat Arms. Asides from the fact that it's a F2P PC shooter, it plays pretty similarly to CoD. In comparison to that, CoD is much much better.
Battlefield is nothing like either. It's not KDR centric -- in fact, going in with the intent to kill a bunch of folks is more likely to make your team lose than being tactical. I mean, you kill one or two people, but when you finally die, everyone just respawns right at the last man standing. Basically everything your Rambo-butt just did was pointless.
Unless you move as a group and coordinate your attacks, you're going to lose.
In more arcade style games like CoD and Combat Arms, it's more about shooting people in the face. I love that -- Therefore I love all of the above games.
Show the love, not the hate.
But yeah, it looks exactly the same as MW2 -- kinda disappointing.
To me, it's better to compare Call of Duty to Combat Arms. Asides from the fact that it's a F2P PC shooter, it plays pretty similarly to CoD. In comparison to that, CoD is much much better.
Battlefield is nothing like either. It's not KDR centric -- in fact, going in with the intent to kill a bunch of folks is more likely to make your team lose than being tactical. I mean, you kill one or two people, but when you finally die, everyone just respawns right at the last man standing. Basically everything your Rambo-butt just did was pointless.
Unless you move as a group and coordinate your attacks, you're going to lose.
In more arcade style games like CoD and Combat Arms, it's more about shooting people in the face. I love that -- Therefore I love all of the above games.
Show the love, not the hate.
But yeah, it looks exactly the same as MW2 -- kinda disappointing.
i don't give a flying shit. I'm getting it i don't care if or how they changed it all i want is to finish the fucking story.
All of my friends and I agreed that Modern Warfare 2 was a great, fun and very addicting game (there's so much to do and work towards, we still play it regularly) with a lot of balance issues, we even agreed that we would be happy if we just got Modern Warfare 2 with all of the problems fixed. That being said, everything looks great, I agree with Hutch about the colors, but these are the problems I have:
1. The UMP-45 is still used a lot from what I've seen. I loved using that gun, but I can't stand it when I'm killed by it. It feels like you have god mode when you use the weapon.
2. I'm worried about how "quickscoping" is going to turn out. It seems like it's just as easy to do as in Modern Warfare 2, which is awful. Pretty much like having an aimbot.
3. Knifing seems exactly the same, just without commando, which is a very annoying problem. I really wish they went back to the knifing system from the original Modern Warfare, where there wasn't any lunge whatsoever, where you couldn't knife around corners, and where THE ENEMY ACTUALLY HAD TO BE ON THE SCREEN SO YOU COULD KILL THEM.
4. Deathstreaks are back? I could of sworn that it was officially announced that they were gone. Oh well, but that vest Hutch picked up looks way too powerful (he got shot around 5 times and took absolutely no damage).
Of course, I haven't played so I can't say for sure.
Oh, and yes I am disappointed there's nothing new, but what are you going to do, it's the 8th game in a series in 2011. How much has Final Fantasy changed over more than 10 games (besides the online ones)?
1. The UMP-45 is still used a lot from what I've seen. I loved using that gun, but I can't stand it when I'm killed by it. It feels like you have god mode when you use the weapon.
2. I'm worried about how "quickscoping" is going to turn out. It seems like it's just as easy to do as in Modern Warfare 2, which is awful. Pretty much like having an aimbot.
3. Knifing seems exactly the same, just without commando, which is a very annoying problem. I really wish they went back to the knifing system from the original Modern Warfare, where there wasn't any lunge whatsoever, where you couldn't knife around corners, and where THE ENEMY ACTUALLY HAD TO BE ON THE SCREEN SO YOU COULD KILL THEM.
4. Deathstreaks are back? I could of sworn that it was officially announced that they were gone. Oh well, but that vest Hutch picked up looks way too powerful (he got shot around 5 times and took absolutely no damage).
Of course, I haven't played so I can't say for sure.
Oh, and yes I am disappointed there's nothing new, but what are you going to do, it's the 8th game in a series in 2011. How much has Final Fantasy changed over more than 10 games (besides the online ones)?
playing with friends would be the only reason i would even consider buying it... but thats just not enough for me, especially considering the frustration that inevitably comes with every CoD game. you know there will be terrible glitches, and after a few months people will figure out how to dominate in the game. it wont be fun at allYosharian said:
dude, people don't play CoD like they do for the Campaign. Honestly tell me if there was no multiplayer (or that it was just bad MP) that it would sell like it does. Different settings and different stories don't matter if the main reason the game sells is the same thing as the last thing they put out. It's the same thing with the 2KX sports games. DLC for the price of a full game. Me, I'll borrow this game from my friend who is a CoD junkie, play the 10-hour campaign just to see where the story went from MW2, and not even touch the multiplayer.